Characterising older adults' engagement in age-friendly community initiatives: perspectives from core group leaders in the Northeast United States of America

被引:12
作者
Greenfield, Emily A. [1 ]
Reyes, Laurent [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Sch Social Work, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
关键词
social participation; civic engagement; inclusion; volunteer; qualitative; theory; community practice; strengths-based; LESSONS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1017/S0144686X2000166X
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学]; R592 [老年病学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100203 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Researchers and programme champions alike have identified older adults as key contributors to age-friendly community change efforts. There has been very little scholarship, however, to characterise the nature of older adults' engagement in age-friendly community initiatives (AFCIs). To help address this gap, we drew on five waves of data from semi-structured interviews with core group members of eight AFCIs in a Northeast region of the United States of America. Interviews were conducted as part of a multi-year, community-engaged study on the development of philanthropically supported AFCIs. We iteratively coded segments of the interviews in which core group members described the involvement of older adults, as well as their efforts to engage older adults in the initiatives. This analysis resulted in an inductive-analytic typology with five qualitatively distinct categories, including older adults as: (a) consumers (receiving information, goods and services through the AFCI), (b) informants (sharing perspectives on ageing in the community with the core group), (c) task assistants (assisting with project-oriented tasks under the direction of the core group), (d) champions (contributing ideas and implementing action on their own initiative), and (e) core group members (holding primary responsibility for driving the work of the AFCI forward). We discuss implications of the typology for research on AFCI implementation and evaluation, as well as opportunities for AFCIs to enhance the engagement of older adults from historically marginalised groups.
引用
收藏
页码:1465 / 1484
页数:20
相关论文
共 44 条
[11]   Developing Age-Friendly Cities: Case Studies From Brussels and Manchester and Implications for Policy and Practice [J].
Buffel, Tine ;
McGarry, Paul ;
Phillipson, Chris ;
De Donder, Liesbeth ;
Dury, Sarah ;
De Witte, Nico ;
Smetcoren, An-Sofie ;
Verte, Dominique .
JOURNAL OF AGING & SOCIAL POLICY, 2014, 26 (1-2) :52-72
[12]  
Campbell Jake., 2015, Ghosts of the Restless Shore: Space, Place and Memory in Sefton, P1
[13]  
Charmaz K., 2006, CONSTRUCTING GROUNDE
[14]  
Filinson R., 2016, SOCIOLOGY GAPS FORGO, V2
[15]   Collaborative Partnership in Age-Friendly Cities: Two Case Studies From Quebec, Canada [J].
Garon, Suzanne ;
Paris, Mario ;
Beaulieu, Marie ;
Veil, Anne ;
Laliberte, Andreanne .
JOURNAL OF AGING & SOCIAL POLICY, 2014, 26 (1-2) :73-87
[16]  
Gonyea J.G., 2015, Public Policy Aging Report, V25, P9, DOI DOI 10.1093/PPAR/PRU056
[17]   Community Gerontology: A Framework for Research, Policy, and Practice on Communities and Aging [J].
Greenfield, Emily A. ;
Black, Kathy ;
Buffel, Tine ;
Yeh, Jarmin .
GERONTOLOGIST, 2019, 59 (05) :803-810
[18]   Getting Started: An Empirically Derived Logic Model for Age-Friendly Community Initiatives in the Early Planning Phase [J].
Greenfield, Emily A. .
JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGICAL SOCIAL WORK, 2018, 61 (03) :295-312
[19]   Age-Friendly Community Initiatives: Conceptual Issues and Key Questions [J].
Greenfield, Emily A. ;
Oberlink, Mia ;
Scharlach, Andrew E. ;
Neal, Margaret B. ;
Stafford, Philip B. .
GERONTOLOGIST, 2015, 55 (02) :191-198
[20]   Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide [J].
Kallio, Hanna ;
Pietila, Anna-Maija ;
Johnson, Martin ;
Kangasniemi, Mari .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2016, 72 (12) :2954-2965