Economic valuation of ecosystem goods and services: a review for decision makers

被引:48
|
作者
Tinch, Robert [1 ]
Beaumon, Nicola [2 ]
Sunderlan, Tim [3 ]
Ozdemiroglu, Ece [4 ]
Barton, David [5 ]
Bowe, Colm [6 ]
Borger, Tobias [7 ]
Burgess, Paul [8 ]
Cooper, Canon Nigel [9 ,10 ]
Faccioli, Michela [11 ,23 ]
Failler, Pierre [12 ]
Gkolemi, Ioanna [13 ]
Kumar, Ritesh [14 ]
Longo, Alberto [15 ]
McVittie, Alistair [16 ]
Morris, Joe [17 ]
Park, Jacob [18 ]
Ravenscroft, Neil [19 ]
Schaafsma, Marije [20 ]
Vause, James [21 ]
Ziv, Guy [22 ]
机构
[1] Iodine Sprl, Chaussee Hulpe 425, B-1170 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Plymouth Marine Lab, Plymouth, Devon, England
[3] Nat England, York, N Yorkshire, England
[4] Eftec, London, England
[5] Norwegian Inst Nat Res NINA, Oslo, Norway
[6] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Environm Sci, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[7] Univ Stirling, Econ Div, Stirling, Scotland
[8] Cranfield Univ, Cranfield Soil & Agrifood Inst, Sch Water Energy & Environm, Cranfield, Beds, England
[9] Anglia Ruskin Univ, Global Sustainabil Inst, Cambridge, England
[10] Bishop Woodford House, Ely, England
[11] James Hutton Inst, Social Econ & Geog Sci Res Grp, Aberdeen, Scotland
[12] Univ Portsmouth, Ctr Blue Governance, Portsmouth Business Sch, Econ & Finance Grp, Portsmouth, Hants, England
[13] Nemertis Ltd, London, England
[14] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Biol Sci, Gibson Inst, IGFS, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[15] Wetlands Int South Asia, New Delhi, India
[16] SRUC, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[17] Cranfield Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Technol, Bedford, England
[18] Green Mt Coll, Poultney, VT USA
[19] Royal Agr Univ, Sch Real Estate & Land Management, Cirencester, England
[20] Univ Southampton, Sch Geog & Environm Sci, Univ Dr, Southampton, Hants, England
[21] UN Environm World Conservat Monitoring Ctr, Cambridge, England
[22] Univ Leeds, Sch Geog, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[23] Univ Exeter, LEEP Inst, Business Sch, Xfi Bldg,1st Floor,Rennes Dr, Exeter EX4 4PU, Devon, England
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”; 英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
Economic valuation; criticisms of economic valuation; stated preference; revealed preference; externalities; ecosystem services; policy appraisal; decision support; STATED PREFERENCE METHODS; OPTIMAL TRANSITION PATH; COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS; CONTINGENT VALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUATION; PROTEST RESPONSES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CHOICE; DEMAND; BIODIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1080/21606544.2019.1623083
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
There is increasing interest in the use of economic valuation of ecosystem goods and services for a wide variety of purposes. These include relatively familiar uses in project appraisal and more novel applications in advocacy, performance tracking and accounting in public and private settings. Decision makers who use valuation information need to understand the background, strengths and weaknesses of these approaches. The methods have a strong foundation in economic theory and offer a rapidly growing evidence base, improving ability to evaluate a broad range of ecosystem goods and services. Nevertheless, there are theoretical and practical limitations that need to be understood and kept in mind when interpreting results. In this paper, we briefly review the economic valuation methods and situate them in their historical and theoretical contexts. We assess the main critiques, attempts at resolving them, and implications for the usefulness of the methods in different contexts. We examine the main barriers and opportunities for wider uses of valuation evidence, and draw conclusions on the appropriate role of valuation in future, as a tool for aiding reflection and deliberation processes.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 378
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reviewing the dynamics of economic values and preferences for ecosystem goods and services
    M. Skourtos
    A. Kontogianni
    P. A. Harrison
    Biodiversity and Conservation, 2010, 19 : 2855 - 2872
  • [42] Economic valuation and option-based payments for ecosystem services
    Srinivasan, Sunderasan
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2015, 20 (07) : 1055 - 1077
  • [43] CULTURAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND VALUATION METHODS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Marquez, Laura Andreina Matos
    Castro, Joana D'Arc Bardella
    Martins, Emilly Layne
    ANUARIO TURISMO Y SOCIEDAD, 2024, 34 : 111 - 126
  • [44] Defining and classifying ecosystem services for economic valuation: the case of forest water services
    Ojea, Elena
    Martin-Ortega, Julia
    Chiabai, Aline
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2012, 19-20 : 1 - 15
  • [45] Review of the Ecosystem Services of Temperate Wetlands and Their Valuation Tools
    Delle Grazie, Fabio M.
    Gill, Laurence W.
    WATER, 2022, 14 (09)
  • [46] Methods for monetary valuation of ecosystem services: A scoping review
    Selivanov, Egor
    Hlavackova, Petra
    JOURNAL OF FOREST SCIENCE, 2021, 67 (11) : 499 - 511
  • [47] Economic Valuation of Forest Ecosystem Services in Heshui Watershed using Contingent Valuation Method
    Tao, Zhang
    Yan, Haiming
    Zhan, Jinyan
    18TH BIENNIAL ISEM CONFERENCE ON ECOLOGICAL MODELLING FOR GLOBAL CHANGE AND COUPLED HUMAN AND NATURAL SYSTEM, 2012, 13 : 2445 - 2450
  • [48] On the potential use of the Ecosystem Services Valuation Database for valuation in the System of Environmental Economic Accounting
    Brander, Luke M.
    Schagner, Jan Philipp
    de Groot, Rudolf
    ONE ECOSYSTEM, 2022, 7
  • [49] Local identification and valuation of ecosystem goods and services from Opuntia scrublands of Ayacucho, Peru
    Rodríguez, LC
    Pascual, U
    Niemeyer, HM
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 57 (01) : 30 - 44
  • [50] Some considerations about the economic valuation of environmental goods and services in protected area
    Hernandez Santoyo, Alain
    Casas Vilardell, Mayra
    Leon Sanchez, Maria Amparo
    Caballero Fernandez, Rafael
    Perez Leon, Victor Ernesto
    REVISTA TECNOLOGIA E SOCIEDADE, 2012, 8 (14): : 7 - 16