Secondary effects, digital technology, and free speech: The Internet and the first amendment

被引：0
作者：
Flynn, TR [1 ]
机构：
[1] Slippery Rock Univ, Slippery Rock, PA 16057 USA
来源：
SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY, PROCEEDINGS | 2002年
关键词：
D O I：
10.1109/ISTAS.2002.1013820
中图分类号：
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号：
0812 ;
摘要：
Digital technology is challenging established legal doctrine concerning sexually-oriented expression, an area of relative stability for the past thirty years. Following an (1) Introduction, this paper examines: (2) COPA and the viability of "community standards" to assess obscenity; (3) CPPA and the emergence of the "secondary-effects" doctrine as rational for censoring sexual expression; (4) concludes by identifying the fundamental implications these two cases pose for the First Amendment.
引用
收藏
页码：229 / 235
页数：7
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
CORNREVERE R, 2001, CAN CONSTITUTION KEE
[2]  
Dunning H.John, 1996, TAKING CYBERSPACE SE, P1
[3]  
HUDSON DL, 1997, WASHBURN LJ, V37, P57
[4]  
Johnson D., 1996, STANFORD LAW REV MAY, P1
[5]  
O'Connell BM, 1997, AUST COMPUT J, V29, P6
[6]  
PAUL B, 2001, COMMUNICATION LAW PO, V6, P355, DOI DOI 10.1207/S15326926CLP0602_
[7]  
POLLOCK B, 2000, SETON HALL CONSTITUT, V11, P151
[8]   Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following homicide [J].
Pollock, PH .
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 11 (01) :176-184
[9]  
ROHR M, 1993, GOLDEN GATE U L REV, V23, P413
[10]  
SMOLLA R, 1996, SMOLLA NIMMER FREEDO, V3
12