Initial clinical evaluation of a handheld device for detecting retained surgical gauze sponges using radiofrequency identification technology

被引:129
作者
Macario, Alex
Morris, Dean
Morris, Sharon
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesia, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Res & Policy, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Surg Resources LLC, Kalispell, MT USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archsurg.141.7.659
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Hypothesis: A handheld wand-scanning device (1.5 lb, battery powered, 10 X 10 X 1.5 in) has been developed to detect commonly used surgical gauze sponges, which have been tagged with a radiofrequency identification (RFID) chip. We tested the hypothesis that this wand device has a successful detection rate of 100%, with 100% specificity and 100% sensitivity. Design: Prospective, blinded, experimental clinical trial. Setting: Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif. Patients: Eight patients undergoing abdominal or pelvic surgery. Interventions: Eight untagged sponges (1 control per patient) and 28 RFID sponges were placed in the patients. just before closure, the first surgeon placed 1RFID sponge (adult laparotomy tape; 18 X 18 in, 4-ply) in the surgical site, while the second surgeon looked away so as to be blinded to sponge placement. The edges of the wound were pulled together so that the inside of the cavity was not exposed during the detection experiments. The second (blinded) surgeon used the wand-scanning device to try to detect the RFID sponge. Main Outcome Measures: A successful detection was defined as detection of an RFID sponge within 1 minute. We also administered a questionnaire to the surgeon and nurse involved in the detections to assess ease of use. Results: The RFID wand device detected all sponges correctly, in less than 3 seconds on average. There were no false-positive or false-negative results. Conclusions: We found a detection accuracy of 100% for the RFID wand device. Despite this engineering success, the possibility of human error and retained sponges remains because handheld scanning can be performed incorrectly.
引用
收藏
页码:659 / 662
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Ahmad Gulzar, 2003, J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, V13, P640
[2]  
*ASS ADV MED INSTR, 2005, ISOWD1 ASS ADV MED I
[3]  
Association of periOperative Registered Nurses, 1999, AORN J, V70, P1083
[4]  
BECKER C, 2004, MOD HEALTHCARE, V34, P40
[5]  
Becker Cinda, 2004, Mod Healthc, V34, P40
[6]  
DEWITTE C, 1975, J BELG RADIOL, V58, P369
[7]   Electronic tagging of surgical sponges to prevent their accidental retention [J].
Fabian, CE .
SURGERY, 2005, 137 (03) :298-301
[8]   Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery [J].
Gawande, AA ;
Studdert, DM ;
Orav, EJ ;
Brennan, TA ;
Zinner, MJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 348 (03) :229-235
[9]   An unusual cause of small bowel obstruction: Gossypiboma – case report [J].
Rasim Gencosmanoglu ;
Resit Inceoglu .
BMC Surgery, 3 (1)
[10]  
GIBBS VC, 2001, MAKING HLTH CARE SAF