Hippocampal activation during face-name associative memory encoding: blocked versus permuted design

被引:6
作者
De Vogelaere, Frederick [1 ]
Santens, Patrick [2 ]
Achten, Erik [3 ]
Boon, Paul [2 ]
Vingerhoets, Guy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Neuropsychol Lab, Dept Neurol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Neurol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Hippocampus; Episodic memory; Face-name association; fMRI; Anterior-posterior; MEDIAL TEMPORAL-LOBE; EVENT-RELATED FMRI; FUNCTIONAL-DIFFERENTIATION; RETRIEVAL; RECOGNITION; EFFICIENCY; CORTEX; POWER; PET;
D O I
10.1007/s00234-009-0532-9
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The contribution of the hippocampal subregions to episodic memory through the formation of new associations between previously unrelated items such as faces and names is established but remains under discussion. Block design studies in this area of research generally tend to show posterior hippocampal activation during encoding of novel associational material while event-related studies emphasize anterior hippocampal involvement. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess the involvement of anterior and posterior hippocampus in the encoding of novel associational material compared to the viewing of previously seen associational material. We used two different experimental designs, a block design and a permuted block design, and applied it to the same associative memory task to perform valid statistical comparisons. Our results indicate that the permuted design was able to capture more anterior hippocampal activation compared to the block design, which emphasized more posterior hippocampal involvement. These differences were further investigated and attributed to a combination of the polymodal stimuli we used and the experimental design. Activation patterns during encoding in both designs occurred along the entire longitudinal axis of the hippocampus, but with different centers of gravity. The maximal activated voxel in the block design was situated in the posterior half of the hippocampus while in the permuted design this was located in the anterior half.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 36
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]  
CVC
[22]   Estimating efficiency a priori: a comparison of blocked and randomized designs [J].
Mechelli, A ;
Price, CJ ;
Henson, RNA ;
Friston, KJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 2003, 18 (03) :798-805
[23]   Comparing event-related and epoch analysis in blocked design fMRI [J].
Mechelli, A ;
Henson, RNA ;
Price, CJ ;
Friston, KJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 2003, 18 (03) :806-810
[24]   Activation of human hippocampal formation reflects success in both encoding and cued recall of paired associates [J].
Meltzer, JA ;
Constable, RT .
NEUROIMAGE, 2005, 24 (02) :384-397
[25]   Biphasic hemodynamic responses influence deactivation and may mask activation in block-design fMRI paradigms [J].
Meltzer, Jed A. ;
Negishi, Michiro ;
Constable, R. Todd .
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2008, 29 (04) :385-399
[26]   Convergence of unimodal and polymodal sensory input to the entorhinal cortex in the fascicularis monkey [J].
Mohedano-Moriano, A. ;
Martinez-Marcos, A. ;
Pro-Sistiaga, P. ;
Blaizot, X. ;
Arroyo-Jimenez, M. M. ;
Marcos, P. ;
Artacho-Perula, E. ;
Insausti, R. .
NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 151 (01) :255-271
[27]  
Moser MB, 1998, HIPPOCAMPUS, V8, P608, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1998)8:6<608::AID-HIPO3>3.0.CO
[28]  
2-7
[29]   Any novelty in hippocampal formation and memory? [J].
Nyberg, L .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY, 2005, 18 (04) :424-428
[30]   Anatomic localization and quantitative analysis of gradient refocused echo-planar fMRI susceptibility artifacts [J].
Ojemann, JG ;
Akbudak, E ;
Snyder, AZ ;
McKinstry, RC ;
Raichle, ME ;
Conturo, TE .
NEUROIMAGE, 1997, 6 (03) :156-167