Attention to impact pathways in EISs of large dam projects

被引:55
作者
Brismar, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Tema Inst, Dept Water & Environm Studies, SE-58183 Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
cumulative impact; Environmental Impact Statement (EIS); impact pathway; large dam project; river basin;
D O I
10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00162-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The importance of addressing cumulative environmental impacts in Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) of large development projects is increasingly underlined. However, cumulative impacts are generated through complex impact pathways, involving multiple root causes and lower and higher order effects, interlinked by cause-effect relationships. Consideration to potential impact pathways may thus be difficult without appropriate analytical methods, expertise, and supportive Environmental Impact Assessment guidelines and terms-of-references (TOR). This paper presents the results of an analysis of six EISs prepared for large dam projects between 1994 and 2001. The objective was to analyze if, how, and to what extent potential impact pathways involved in the generation of dam-related cumulative impacts have been addressed in the analyzed material. For this purpose, a theoretical framework was developed, which identifies four key root causes, their potential effects, and associated cause-effect relationships. The analysis revealed various shortcomings. Important imbalances were found in the degree of attention given to effects of different categories. Lower order effects received greater attention than higher order, and the potential effects of reservoir filling were more extensively attended to than those of flow blockage, storage, and regulation. Most importantly, little effort was made to carefully explain the potential impact pathways involved; root causes were often referred to in general terms only, and potential pathways leading up to an anticipated higher order effect or following upon an expected lower order effect were often inadequately addressed or ignored. Probable reasons for the discovered shortcomings are discussed and recommendations are presented for improving the World Bank EIA guidelines for large dam projects. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 87
页数:29
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ENV ASS SOURC
[2]  
[Anonymous], ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES
[3]  
Appiah-Opoku Seth., 2001, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V21, P59, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00063-9
[4]  
BEANLANDS GE, 1984, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V18, P267
[5]  
BERGKAMP G, 2000, INP WORLD COMM DAMS
[6]  
Bilen O., 1997, TURKEY WATER ISSUES
[7]   River systems as providers of goods and services: A basis for comparing desired and undesired effects of large dam projects [J].
Brismar, A .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2002, 29 (05) :598-609
[8]  
Brooker M.P., 1981, Advances in Applied Biology, V6, P91
[9]  
Burris R.K., 1997, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V17, P5, DOI [10.1016/S0195-9255(96)00082-0, DOI 10.1016/S0195-9255(96)00082-0]
[10]  
CADA G F, 1990, Environmental Professional, V12, P2