Selection of Production Reliability Indicators for Project Simulation Model

被引:4
|
作者
Pusztai, Laszlo Peter [1 ]
Nagy, Lajos [2 ]
Budai, Istvan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Debrecen, Fac Engn, H-4028 Debrecen, Hungary
[2] Univ Debrecen, Fac Econ & Business, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2022年 / 12卷 / 10期
关键词
production reliability; reliability; mean time between failure (MTBF); mean time to repair (MTTR); process simulation; project production; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; DECISION; QUALITY; DESIGN;
D O I
10.3390/app12105012
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Due to technological enhancements, traditional, qualitative decision-making methods are usually replaced by data-driven decision-making even in smaller companies. Process simulation is one of these solutions, which can help companies avoid costly failures as well as evaluate positive or negative effects. The reason for this paper is twofold: first, authors conducted a Quality Function Deployment analysis to find the most vital reliability indicators in the field of production scheduling. The importance was acquired from the meta-analysis of papers published in major journals. The authors found 3 indicators to be the most important: mean time between failure (MTBF), mean repair time and mean downtime. The second part of the research is for the implementation of these indicators to the stochastic environment: possible means of application are proposed, confirming the finding with a case study in which 100 products must be produced. The database created from the simulation is analyzed in terms of major production KPIs, such as production quantity, total process time and efficiency of the production. The results of the study show that calculating with reliability issues in production during the negotiation of a production deadline supports business excellence.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Distribution modeling for reliability analysis: Impact of multiple dependences and probability model selection
    Wang, Fan
    Li, Heng
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2018, 59 : 483 - 499
  • [42] Route Reliability Based Simulation Model for HMA Delivery in Urban Areas
    Galic, Mario
    Barisic, Ivana
    Otkovic, Irena Istoka
    TRANSBALTICA 2017: TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 187 : 378 - 386
  • [43] A Coupled Adaptive Kriging Model and Generalized Subset Simulation Hybrid Reliability Analysis Method for Rare Failure Events
    Ling, Yunhan
    Peng, Huajun
    Sun, Yong
    Yuan, Chao
    Su, Zining
    Tian, Xiaoxiao
    Nie, Peng
    Yang, Hengfei
    Yang, Shiyuan
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 163621 - 163637
  • [44] Successful project portfolio management beyond project selection techniques: Understanding the role of structural alignment
    Kaiser, Michael G.
    El Arbi, Fedi
    Ahlemann, Frederik
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2015, 33 (01) : 126 - 139
  • [45] Optimal Selection Model of Project Evaluation based on Hierarchical Fuzzy Evaluation Theory
    Li Jian-feng
    Zhao Jian
    EBM 2010: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-8, 2010, : 1659 - 1662
  • [46] A reliability model for piezoelectric actuators
    He, Zhimin
    Loh, Han Tong
    Xie, Min
    Guo, Guoxiao
    IPEC: 2005 International Power Engineering Conference, Vols 1 and 2, 2005, : 939 - 944
  • [47] Unascertained set decision-making model for selection of project delivery system
    Wu, X. Y.
    Li, H. M.
    CRIOCM2009: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND REAL ESTATE, VOLS 1-6, 2009, : 1953 - 1958
  • [48] Using the deterministic approach model for project portfolio selection problem (PPSP) solutions
    Mogbojuri, A. O.
    Olanrewaju, O. A.
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (09)
  • [49] Reliability and Maintainability Analysis of Bread Production Line
    Tsarouhas, Panagiotis H.
    Arvanitoyannis, Ioannis S.
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION, 2010, 50 (04) : 327 - 343
  • [50] Assessment of structural simulation models by estimating uncertainties due to model selection and model simplification
    Most, Thomas
    COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2011, 89 (17-18) : 1664 - 1672