Development of clinical decision support alerts for pharmacogenomic incidental findings from exome sequencing

被引:20
|
作者
Nishimura, Adam A. [1 ]
Shirts, Brian H. [2 ]
Dorschner, Michael O. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Amendola, Laura M. [5 ]
Smith, Joe W. [6 ]
Jarvik, Gail P. [3 ,5 ]
Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter [1 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Biomed Informat & Med Educ, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Lab Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Genome Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Pathol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Dept Med, Div Med Genet, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[6] Univ Washington, Sch Pharm, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[7] Univ Washington, Dept Pediat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[8] Univ Washington, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
clinical decision support; clinical informatics; electronic medical records; genomic medicine; pharmacogenomics; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; IMPLEMENTATION; MEDICINE; RECOMMENDATIONS; UNIVERSITY; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1038/gim.2015.5
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose: Electronic health records (EHRs) and their associated decision support tools are potentially important means of disseminating a patient's pharmacogenomic profile to his or her health-care providers. We sought to create a proof-of-concept decision support alert system generated from pharmacogenomic incidental findings from exome sequencing. Methods: A pipeline for alerts from exome sequencing tests was created for patients in the New EXome Technology in (NEXT) Medicine study at the University of Washington. Decision support rules using discrete, machine-readable incidental finding results were programmed into a commercial EHR rules engine. An evaluation plan to monitor the alerts in real medical interactions was established. Results: Alerts were created for 48 actionable pharmacogenomic variants in 11 genes and were launched on 24 September 2014 for-University of Washington inpatient care. Of the 94 participants enrolled in the NEXT Medicine study, 49 had one or more pharmacogenomic variants identified for return. Conclusion: Reflections on the process reveal that while incidental findings can be used to generate decision support alerts, substantial resources are required to ensure that each alert is consistent with rapidly evolving pharmacogenomic literature and is customized to fit in the clinical workflow unique to each incidental finding.
引用
收藏
页码:939 / 942
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pharmacogenomic findings from clinical whole exome sequencing of diagnostic odyssey patients
    Cousin, Margot A.
    Matey, Eric T.
    Blackburn, Patrick R.
    Boczek, Nicole J.
    McAllister, Tammy M.
    Kruisselbrink, Teresa M.
    Babovic-Vuksanovic, Dusica
    Lazaridis, Konstantinos N.
    Klee, Eric W.
    MOLECULAR GENETICS & GENOMIC MEDICINE, 2017, 5 (03): : 269 - 279
  • [2] ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing
    Green, Robert C.
    Berg, Jonathan S.
    Grody, Wayne W.
    Kalia, Sarah S.
    Korf, Bruce R.
    Martin, Christa L.
    McGuire, Amy L.
    Nussbaum, Robert L.
    O'Daniel, Julianne M.
    Ormond, Kelly E.
    Rehm, Heidi L.
    Watson, Michael S.
    Williams, Marc S.
    Biesecker, Leslie G.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 15 (07) : 565 - 574
  • [3] Utilizing a user-centered approach to develop and assess pharmacogenomic clinical decision support for thiopurine methyltransferase
    Nguyen, Khoa A.
    Patel, Himalaya
    Haggstrom, David A.
    Zillich, Alan J.
    Imperiale, Thomas F.
    Russ, Alissa L.
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [4] Iterative Development and Evaluation of a Pharmacogenomic-Guided Clinical Decision Support System for Warfarin Dosing
    Melton, Brittany L.
    Zillich, Alan J.
    Saleem, Jason J.
    Russ, Alissa L.
    Tisdale, James E.
    Overholser, Brian R.
    APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS, 2016, 7 (04): : 1088 - 1106
  • [5] Physician perspectives of CYP2C19 and clopidogrel drug-gene interaction active clinical decision support alerts
    Nishimura, Adam A.
    Shirts, Brian H.
    Salama, Joseph
    Smith, Joe W.
    Devine, Beth
    Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2016, 86 : 117 - 125
  • [6] Pharmacogenomic Clinical Decision Support: A Scoping Review
    Smith, D. Max
    Wake, Dyson T.
    Dunnenberger, Henry M.
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 113 (04) : 803 - 815
  • [7] Clinician adherence to pharmacogenomics prescribing recommendations in clinical decision support alerts
    Nguyen, Jenny Q.
    Crews, Kristine R.
    Moore, Ben T.
    Kornegay, Nancy M.
    Baker, Donald K.
    Hasan, Murad
    Campbell, Patrick K.
    Dean, Shannon M.
    Relling, Mary, V
    Hoffman, James M.
    Haidar, Cyrine E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2022, 30 (01) : 132 - 138
  • [8] Evaluating the appropriateness of clinical decision support alerts: A case study
    Olakotan, Olufisayo O.
    Yusof, Maryati M.
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 27 (04) : 868 - 876
  • [9] Recommendations to improve the usability of drug-drug interaction clinical decision support alerts
    Payne, Thomas H.
    Hines, Lisa E.
    Chan, Raymond C.
    Hartman, Seth
    Kapusnik-Uner, Joan
    Russ, Alissa L.
    Chaffee, Bruce W.
    Hartman, Christian
    Tamis, Victoria
    Galbreth, Brian
    Glassman, Peter A.
    Phansalkar, Shobha
    van der Sijs, Heleen
    Gephart, Sheila M.
    Mann, Gordon
    Strasberg, Howard R.
    Grizzle, Amy J.
    Brown, Mary
    Kuperman, Gilad J.
    Steiner, Chris
    Sullins, Amanda
    Ryan, Hugh
    Wittie, Michael A.
    Malone, Daniel C.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2015, 22 (06) : 1243 - 1250
  • [10] Measuring implementation feasibility of clinical decision support alerts for clinical practice recommendations
    Richesson, Rachel L.
    Staes, Catherine J.
    Douthit, Brian J.
    Thoureen, Traci
    Hatch, Daniel J.
    Kawamoto, Kensaku
    Del Fiol, Guilherme
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 27 (04) : 514 - 521