Key factors which influence the success of community forestry in developing countries

被引:228
作者
Baynes, Jack [1 ]
Herbohn, John [1 ]
Smith, Carl [2 ]
Fisher, Robert [1 ,3 ]
Bray, David [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sunshine Coast, Trop Forests & People Res Ctr, Maroochydore 4558, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Agr & Food Sci, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Sci, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[4] Florida Int Univ, Dept Environm Studies, Miami, FL 33199 USA
来源
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS | 2015年 / 35卷
关键词
Community forestry; Social capital; Collective action; Intra-community governance; Causal diagram; PROPERTY-RIGHTS; PROTECTED AREAS; COVER CHANGE; MANAGEMENT; PARTICIPATION; CONSERVATION; MEXICO; NEPAL; TENURE; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.011
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
While community forestry has shown promise to reduce rural poverty, improve reforestation and potentially offset carbon emissions, many projects have failed, either partly or completely. In order to understand why community forestry succeeds or fails, we examined in detail the literature related to community forestry from three countries, Mexico, Nepal and the Philippines. We also drew on experiences in other countries in Asia, Latin America and Africa. We identified five main interconnected factors which the literature suggests are often critical to the success of community forestry. To integrate the many ways in which community forestry projects can improve the state of these factors, we use the concept of 'bonding social capital', i.e. communities' ability to work together towards a common aim and 'bridging social capital', i.e. their ability to liaise with the outside world. To understand the interaction of the five success factors and the way in which improvements to bonding or bridging social capital may affect them, we developed a causal diagram which depicts the interrelationships between the success factors and the key points at which project inputs may be best applied. It is clear from our analysis that failing to appreciate both the complexity and interaction of the various influences may lead to project failure. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 238
页数:13
相关论文
共 133 条
[1]   Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: An analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework [J].
Agarwal, B .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 29 (10) :1623-1648
[2]   Does Women's Proportional Strength Affect their Participation? Governing Local Forests in South Asia [J].
Agarwal, Bina .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 38 (01) :98-112
[3]   Gender and forest conservation: The impact of women's participation in community forest governance [J].
Agarwal, Bina .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (11) :2785-2799
[4]   Rule making in community forestry institutions: The difference women make [J].
Agarwal, Bina .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (8-9) :2296-2308
[5]  
Agrawal A., 2007, International Journal of the Commons, V1, P111, DOI [10.18352/ijc.10, DOI 10.18352/IJC.10]
[6]   Benefits and Barriers to Certification of Community-Based Forest Operations in Cameroon: An Exploratory Assessment [J].
Alemagi, Dieudonne ;
Hajjar, Reem ;
David, Serena ;
Kozak, Robert A. .
SMALL-SCALE FORESTRY, 2012, 11 (04) :417-433
[7]  
Alzula N., 2005, LINKING PEOPLE POLIC, P33
[8]  
Anderson T., 2010, Defence of Melanesian Customary Land, P2
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2011, 165 FAO
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2004, SMALL SCALE EC MANAG, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11842-004-0026-X