Low-Versus High-Risk Rectal Cancer Based on MRI Features: Outcomes in Patients Treated Without Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

被引:8
作者
Jia, Xiao-Xuan [1 ]
Wang, Yi [1 ]
Cheng, Jin [1 ]
Yao, Xun [1 ]
Yin, Mu-jun [2 ]
Zhou, Jing [2 ]
Ye, Ying-Jiang [2 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Dept Radiol, Peoples Hosp, 11 Xizhimen S St, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Peoples Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
circumferential resection margin; extramural vascular invasion; MRI; rectal cancer; CIRCUMFERENTIAL RESECTION MARGIN; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; LOCAL RECURRENCE; FOLLOW-UP; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; TME TRIAL; RADIOTHERAPY; SURGERY; ACCURACY; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.17.18980
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study was to compare the prognoses of patients with low- and high-risk rectal cancer detected by MRI who were treated without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) and to determine independent risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This retrospective study included 18.5 patients with pathologically proven rectal adenocarcinoma who were treated without NCRT. Cancer was defined as high risk if one or more of the following factors were present: extramural depth of tumor invasion greater than 5 mm or stage T4a or T4b for tumor in the mid or high rectum; involvement of intersphincteric space, levators, or adjacent organs for tumor in the low rectum; extramural venous invasion (EMVI); or circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement. Patients without any of those risk factors were placed in the low-risk group. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression model were used to compare the survival outcomes between the two groups and to investigate the univariate and multivariate influences of the risk factors. RESULTS. Cancer was deemed to be low risk in 65 (35.1%) patients and high risk in 120 (64.9%) patients. The two patient groups had statistically significant differences in 3-year actuarial overall survival (OS; 100% vs 88.3%, p = 0.0044), disease-free survival (DFS; 92.3% vs 60.0%, p < 0.0001), and local recurrence (LR; 1.5% vs 10.0%, p = 0.0297). CRM involvement was identified as an independent risk factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 478; 95% CI, 1.24-18.45), DFS (HR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.24-4.81), and LR (HR, 3.92; 95% CI, 1.07-14.41). Moreover, EMVI was identified as an independent risk factor for DFS (HR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.28-4.74). CONCLUSION. The LR and long-term survival of patients in the low-risk group were more favorable than those of patients in the high-risk group. EMVI and CRM status were in-dependent risk factors.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 334
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Chemotherapy Alone for Patients With Stage II/III Rectal Cancer Undergoing Radical Surgery [J].
AlGizawy, Samy M. ;
Essa, Hoda H. ;
Ahmed, Badawy M. .
ONCOLOGIST, 2015, 20 (07) :752-757
[2]  
Arumugam PJ, 2002, BRIT J SURG, V89, P1067, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02169_1.x
[3]   MR imaging for rectal cancer: the role in staging the primary and response to neoadjuvant therapy [J].
Battersby, Nick J. ;
Moran, Brendan ;
Yu, Stanley ;
Tekkis, Paris ;
Brown, Gina .
EXPERT REVIEW OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 8 (06) :703-719
[4]   Rectal cancer: how accurate can imaging predict the T stage and the circumferential resection margin? [J].
Beets-Tan, RGH ;
Beets, GL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2003, 18 (05) :385-391
[5]   LATE SIDE EFFECTS AND QUALITY OF LIFE AFTER RADIOTHERAPY FOR RECTAL CANCER [J].
Bruheim, Kjersti ;
Guren, Marianne G. ;
Skovlund, Eva ;
Hjermstad, Marianne J. ;
Dahl, Olav ;
Frykholm, Gunilla ;
Carlsen, Erik ;
Tveit, Kjell Magne .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (04) :1005-1011
[6]   Evidence for radiological and histopathological prognostic importance of detecting extramural venous invasion in rectal cancer: recommendations for radiology and histopathology reporting [J].
Chand, M. ;
Palmer, T. ;
Blomqvist, L. ;
Nagtegaal, I. ;
West, N. ;
Brown, G. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 17 (06) :468-473
[7]  
Edge S.B., 2010, AJCC cancer staging manual, V649
[8]   Rectal Cancer [J].
Engstrom, Paul F. ;
Arnoletti, Juan Pablo ;
Benson, Al B., III ;
Chen, Yi-Jen ;
Choti, Michael A. ;
Cooper, Harry S. ;
Covey, Anne ;
Dilawari, Raza A. ;
Early, Dayna S. ;
Enzinger, Peter C. ;
Fakih, Marwan G. ;
Fleshman, James, Jr. ;
Fuchs, Charles ;
Grem, Jean L. ;
Kiel, Krystyna ;
Knol, James A. ;
Leong, Lucille A. ;
Lin, Edward ;
Mulcahy, Mary F. ;
Rao, Sujata ;
Ryan, David P. ;
Saltz, Leonard ;
Shibata, David ;
Skibber, John M. ;
Sofocleous, Constantinos ;
Thomas, James ;
Venook, Alan P. ;
Willett, Christopher .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2009, 7 (08) :838-881
[9]   Surgery with versus without preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy for mid/low rectal cancer: an interim analysis of a prospective, randomized trial [J].
Fan, Wen-Hua ;
Wang, Fu-Long ;
Lu, Zhen-Hai ;
Pan, Zhi-Zhong ;
Li, Li-Ren ;
Gao, Yuan-Hong ;
Chen, Gong ;
Wu, Xiao-Jun ;
Ding, Pei-Rong ;
Zeng, Zhi-Fan ;
Wan, De-Sen .
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 34
[10]   Preoperative Chemoradiation May Not Always Be Needed for Patients With T3 and T2N+Rectal Cancer [J].
Frasson, Matteo ;
Garcia-Granero, Eduardo ;
Roda, Desamparados ;
Flor-Lorente, Blas ;
Rosello, Susana ;
Esclapez, Pedro ;
Faus, Carmen ;
Navarro, Samuel ;
Campos, Salvador ;
Cervantes, Andres .
CANCER, 2011, 117 (14) :3118-3125