Impact of Celestial Datum Definition on EOP Estimation and CRF Orientation in the Global VLBI Session IYA09

被引:0
作者
Raposo-Pulido, V. [1 ,2 ]
Heinkelmann, R. [2 ]
Nilsson, T. [2 ]
Karbon, M. [2 ]
Soja, B. [2 ]
Kayikci, E. Tanir [3 ]
Lu, C. [2 ]
Mora-Diaz, J. [2 ]
Schuh, H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Geog Inst, IGN, Madrid, Spain
[2] GFZ German Res Ctr Geosci, Helmholtz Ctr Potsdam, Dept Geodesy & Remote Sensing 1, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
[3] Karadeniz Tech Univ, Dept Geomat Engn, TR-61080 Trabzon, Turkey
来源
IAG 150 YEARS | 2016年 / 143卷
关键词
Celestial datum; Earth orientation parameters (EOP); Geodetic very long baseline interferometry (VLBI); International celestial reference frame (ICRF); Reference systems; Vienna VLBI software (VieVS); REFERENCE FRAME; TERRESTRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/1345_2015_106
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Earth Orientation Parameters (EOP) provide the rotation of the International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS) to the Geocentric Celestial Reference System (GCRS) as a function of time. When estimating a Celestial Reference Frame (CRF) usually a number of radio sources with a long history of observations and stable positions are included in the datum used to define the orientation of the frame. How many and which radio sources are taken into account for the datum definition has a significant effect on the estimated EOP. In this study we analyze the effects of different options for the celestial datum definition on the precision of the EOP and on the agreement w.r.t the last realization of the International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF2; Fey et al., The second realization of the international celestial reference frame by very long baseline interferometry, IERS Technical Note No. 35, 2009). The resulting EOP of the special VLBI session IYA09 are compared to the C04 08 EOP series (Bizouard and Gambis, The combined solution C04 for Earth orientation parameters consistent with international terrestrial reference frame 2008, IERS Notice 2011, 2011). The analysis shows that the smallest uncertainties for EOP are achieved when the maximum number of defining sources is chosen for the datum. Comparing with a typical VLBI session, the precision of the EOP and the agreement of the axes w.r.t. ICRF2 could be improved if more defining sources, especially in the southern hemisphere, were considered.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 147
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2010, INT
  • [2] Bizouard C, 2011, IERS NOTICE 2011
  • [3] VLBI terrestrial reference frame contributions to ITRF2008
    Boeckmann, Sarah
    Artz, T.
    Nothnagel, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2010, 84 (03) : 201 - 219
  • [4] The New Vienna VLBI Software VieVS
    Boehm, J.
    Boehm, S.
    Nilsson, T.
    Pany, A.
    Plank, L.
    Spicakova, H.
    Teke, K.
    Schuh, H.
    [J]. GEODESY FOR PLANET EARTH: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2009 IAG SYMPOSIUM, 2012, 136 : 1007 - 1011
  • [5] Selecting stable extragalactic compact radio sources from the permanent astrogeodetic VLBI program
    Feissel-Vernier, M
    [J]. ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2003, 403 (01): : 105 - 110
  • [6] The second extension of the International Celestial Reference Frame: ICRF-EXT.1
    Fey, AL
    Ma, C
    Arias, EF
    Charlot, P
    Feissel-Vernier, M
    Gontier, AM
    Jacobs, CS
    Li, J
    MacMillan, DS
    [J]. ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 127 (06) : 3587 - 3608
  • [7] Fey AL, 2009, 35 IERS IERSIVS WORK, P204
  • [8] Gipson J, 2010, IVS 2010 GEN M P, P90
  • [9] Gontier A- M, 2006, 34 IERS, p[7, 137]
  • [10] Lambert S, 2013, OPA2013A SOLUTION