Feasibility and effects of decision aids

被引:125
作者
Molenaar, S
Sprangers, MAG
Postma-Schuit, FCE
Rutgers, EJT
Noorlander, J
Hendriks, J
De Haes, HCJM
机构
[1] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Psychol Med, NL-1100 DE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Ctr Comprehens Canc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Canc Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Netherlands Inst Hlth Promot & Dis Prevent, Woerden, Netherlands
[5] ZAO Hlth Insurance, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
shared decision making; patient decision aids;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X0002000114
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Decision aids for patients have recently been introduced in health care. A literature review was conducted to address the following research questions: I) which types of decision aids have been developed?; 2) to what extent are they feasible, and acceptable to patients and health care providers?; 3) do decision aids affect the decisionmaking process and patients' outcomes? Thirty non-controlled (e.g., one-group-only designs) and controlled studies (e.g., randomized experimental designs) were identified. Decision aids were found to be feasible and acceptable to patients and to increase the agreement between patients' values and decisions and patients' knowledge. The effects of decision aids on decisions and on patients' outcomes, including decision uncertainty, satisfaction, and health, have rarely been addressed. When studied, the beneficial effects of decision aids on these outcomes appear to be rather modest. Implications for future development of decision aids and the design of studies are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 127
页数:16
相关论文
共 64 条