Latent demand for the bone-anchored hearing aid: The lippy group experience

被引:13
作者
Burkey, John M. [1 ]
Berenholz, Leonard P. [1 ]
Lippy, William H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lippy Grp Ear Nose & Throat, Warren, OH 44484 USA
关键词
BAHA; bone conduction; hearing aid; hearing loss; single-sided deafness;
D O I
10.1097/01.mao.0000224086.15968.0d
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The usefulness of the bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) for conductive and mixed hearing losses and recently for single-sided deafness has been well documented. Less clear is the number of patients who might benefit from the BAHA and how many would be interested in having the surgery. The purpose of this investigation is to examine these latter issues from the perspective of an otology practice. Study Design: Retrospective review. Setting: Private otology practice. Patients: Approximately 44,000 patient records were reviewed. On the basis of this review, 617 patients were sent a letter describing the BAHA and explaining that they might be candidates. One hundred sixty-two of these patients made an appointment to be evaluated for the BAHA. Methods: Patients who responded to the BAHA letter underwent an otologic and audiological evaluation to confirm their candidacy. The BAHA surgery and device were described, and interested patients tried the BAHA test band in the office. Patient responses to the BAHA were noted. Results: Approximately 1.4% of the cases reviewed (617/44,000) were considered to be potential BAHA candidates. One hundred forty-six of the 162 patients who scheduled a BAHA evaluation were confirmed to be candidates. After seeing and learning about the BAHA, 92% of the verified candidates wanted to try the BAHA test band. Most patients who tried the test band (92%) liked the BAHA, and nearly a third (30.6%) had BAHA surgery. Patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss who tried the test band were more likely to have BAHA surgery than those with single-sided deafness (45.8% versus 27.3%). The major limiting factor was infrequent or inadequate insurance coverage for the procedure or device. Conclusion: Although the percentage of patients in an otology practice who could benefit from the BAHA is small, finding and alerting potential BAHA candidates are worthwhile.
引用
收藏
页码:648 / 652
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Dutt SN, 2002, J LARYNGOL OTOL, V116, P20
[2]  
HAKANSSON B, 1990, ANN OTO RHINOL LARYN, V99, P1
[3]   Long-term results of bone-anchored hearing aid recipients who had previously used air-conduction hearing aids [J].
Hol, MKS ;
Snik, AFM ;
Mylanus, EAM ;
Cremers, CWRJ .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2005, 131 (04) :321-325
[4]  
Jankowski R, 1998, Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac, V115, P315
[5]   An intra-individual comparison of the previous conventional hearing aid with the bone-anchored hearing aid: the Nijmegen group questionnaire [J].
McDermott, AL ;
Dutt, SN ;
Reid, AP ;
Proops, DW .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2002, 116 :15-19
[6]   Short-and long-term results with Implantable transcutaneous and percutaneous bone-conduction devices [J].
Snik, AFM ;
Dreschler, WA ;
Tange, RA ;
Cremers, CWRJ .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1998, 124 (03) :265-268
[7]  
Tjellstrom A, 1994, Ear Nose Throat J, V73, P112
[8]  
Vaneecloo F M, 2001, Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord), V122, P343
[9]  
Vaneecloo F M, 2000, Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac, V117, P410
[10]   Transcranial contralateral cochlear stimulation in unilateral deafness [J].
Wazen, JJ ;
Spitzer, JB ;
Ghossaini, SN ;
Fayad, JN ;
Niparko, JK ;
Cox, K ;
Brackmann, DE ;
Soli, SD .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2003, 129 (03) :248-254