Influence of spring phenology on seasonal and annual carbon balance in two contrasting New England forests

被引:305
|
作者
Richardson, Andrew D. [1 ]
Hollinger, David Y. [2 ]
Dail, D. Bryan [3 ]
Lee, John T. [3 ]
Munger, J. William [4 ]
O'Keefe, John [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Hampshire, Complex Syst Res Ctr, Durham, NH 03824 USA
[2] Forest Serv, USDA, Durham, NH 03824 USA
[3] Univ Maine, Dept Plant Soil & Envrionm Sci, Orono, ME 04469 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Dept Earth & Planetary Sci, Div Engn & Appl Sci, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Petersham, MA 01366 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
AmeriFlux; bud burst; carbon dioxide; eddy covariance; growing season length; phenology; spring onset; start of spring; WATER-VAPOR EXCHANGE; INTERANNUAL VARIABILITY; DECIDUOUS FOREST; LONG-TERM; SOIL-TEMPERATURE; ATMOSPHERIC CO2; BOREAL; DIOXIDE; CLIMATE; FLUXNET;
D O I
10.1093/treephys/tpn040
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Spring phenology is thought to exert a major influence on the carbon (C) balance of temperate and boreal ecosystems. We investigated this hypothesis using four spring onset phenological indicators in conjunction with surface-atmosphere CO, exchange data from the conifer-dominated Howland Forest and deciduous-dominated Harvard Forest AmeriFlux sites. All phenological measures, including CO2 source-sink transition dates, could be well predicted on the basis of a simple two-parameter spring warming model, indicating good potential for improving the representation of phenological transitions and their dynamic responsiveness to climate variability in land Surface models. The date at which canopy-scale photosynthetic capacity reached a threshold value of 12 mu mol m(-2) s(-1) was better correlated with spring and annual flux integrals than were either deciduous or coniferous bud burst dates. For all phenological indicators, earlier spring onset consistently, but not always significantly, resulted in higher gross primary productivity (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (RE) for both seasonal (spring months, April-June) and annual flux integrals. The increase in RE was less than that in GPP; depending on the phenological indicator used, a one-day advance in spring onset increased springtime net ecosystem productivity (NEP) by 2-4 g C m(-2) day(-1). In general, we Could not detect significant differences between the two forest types in response to earlier spring, although the response to earlier spring was generally more pronounced for Harvard Forest than for Howland Forest, suggesting that future climate warming may favor deciduous species over coniferous species, at least in this region. The effect of earlier spring tended to be about twice as large when annual rather than springtime flux integrals were considered. This result is suggestive of both immediate and lagged effects of earlier spring onset on ecosystem C cycling, perhaps as a result of accelerated N cycling rates and cascading effects on N uptake, foliar N concentrations and photosynthetic capacity.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 331
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Carbon Balance of Two Contrasting Mountain Forest Ecosystems in Switzerland: Similar Annual Trends, but Seasonal Differences
    Etzold, Sophia
    Ruehr, Nadine K.
    Zweifel, Roman
    Dobbertin, Matthias
    Zingg, Andreas
    Pluess, Peter
    Haesler, Rudolf
    Eugster, Werner
    Buchmann, Nina
    ECOSYSTEMS, 2011, 14 (08) : 1289 - 1309
  • [2] The Carbon Balance of Two Contrasting Mountain Forest Ecosystems in Switzerland: Similar Annual Trends, but Seasonal Differences
    Sophia Etzold
    Nadine K. Ruehr
    Roman Zweifel
    Matthias Dobbertin
    Andreas Zingg
    Peter Pluess
    Rudolf Häsler
    Werner Eugster
    Nina Buchmann
    Ecosystems, 2011, 14 : 1289 - 1309
  • [3] Influence of winter precipitation on spring phenology in boreal forests
    Yun, Jeongmin
    Jeong, Su-Jong
    Ho, Chang-Hoi
    Park, Chang-Eui
    Park, Hoonyoung
    Kim, Jinwon
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2018, 24 (11) : 5176 - 5187
  • [4] Influence of physiological phenology on the seasonal pattern of ecosystem respiration in deciduous forests
    Migliavacca, Mirco
    Reichstein, Markus
    Richardson, Andrew D.
    Mahecha, Miguel D.
    Cremonese, Edoardo
    Delpierre, Nicolas
    Galvagno, Marta
    Law, Beverly E.
    Wohlfahrt, Georg
    Black, T. Andrew
    Carvalhais, Nuno
    Ceccherini, Guido
    Chen, Jiquan
    Gobron, Nadine
    Koffi, Ernest
    Munger, J. William
    Perez-Priego, Oscar
    Robustelli, Monica
    Tomelleri, Enrico
    Cescatti, Alessandro
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2015, 21 (01) : 363 - 376
  • [5] Implications of structural diversity for seasonal and annual carbon dioxide fluxes in two temperate deciduous forests
    Tamrakar, Rijan
    Rayment, Mark B.
    Moyano, Fernando
    Mund, Martina
    Knohl, Alexander
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2018, 263 : 465 - 476
  • [6] The Full Annual Carbon Balance of Boreal Forests Is Highly Sensitive to Precipitation
    Oquist, M. G.
    Bishop, K.
    Grelle, A.
    Klemedtsson, L.
    Kohler, S. J.
    Laudon, H.
    Lindroth, A.
    Lofvenius, M. Ottosson
    Wallin, M. B.
    Nilsson, M. B.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LETTERS, 2014, 1 (07): : 315 - 319
  • [7] Contrasting Seasonal Survivorship of Two Migratory Songbirds Wintering in Threatened Mangrove Forests
    Calvert, Anna M.
    Woodcock, John
    McCracken, Jon D.
    AVIAN CONSERVATION AND ECOLOGY, 2010, 5 (01)
  • [8] Seasonal differences in relationships between changes in spring phenology and dynamics of carbon cycle in grasslands
    Xie, Zhiying
    Zhu, Wenquan
    Qiao, Kun
    Zhan, Pei
    Li, Peixian
    ECOSPHERE, 2019, 10 (05):
  • [9] Contrasting seasonal patterns of carbon gain in evergreen and deciduous trees of ancient polar forests
    Royer, DL
    Osborne, CP
    Beerling, DJ
    PALEOBIOLOGY, 2005, 31 (01) : 141 - 150
  • [10] Carbon balance of coniferous forests growing in contrasting climates: Model-based analysis
    Medlyn, BE
    Berbigier, P
    Clement, R
    Grelle, A
    Loustau, D
    Linder, S
    Wingate, L
    Jarvis, PG
    Sigurdsson, BD
    McMurtrie, RE
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2005, 131 (1-2) : 97 - 124