CO2 emissions efficiency and marginal abatement costs of the regional transportation sectors in China

被引:98
|
作者
Wang, Zhaohua [1 ]
He, Weijun
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Transportation sectors; Carbon dioxide; Marginal abatement cost; DEA; FACTOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY; UNDESIRABLE OUTPUTS; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFICIENCY; PRODUCTIVITY; PERFORMANCE; DEA; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.trd.2016.10.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Nowadays, evaluating CO2 emissions efficiency and its marginal abatement cost in transportation sectors has been a hot topic. However, while evaluating the CO2 marginal abatement cost using data envelopment analysis approach, the weak disposability of CO2 may imply positive abatement cost, which undoubtedly violates our common sense. To obtain non-positive marginal abatement cost, CO2 emissions should be treated as an input. To reconcile this contradiction, this paper intends to propose a global, directional distance function model based on previous study to investigate the productivity, economic efficiency, CO2 emissions efficiency, and marginal abatement cost of the China's regional transportation sectors during 2007-2012. The results show that: (1) the productivity, economic efficiency and CO2 emissions efficiency of different regions differ widely. More specifically, the coastal areas of south China perform better than the other areas in terms of productivity, economic efficiency, and CO2 emissions efficiency. (2) Generally, the economic efficiency is greater than CO2 emissions efficiency, which is relatively low in most areas. (3) A negative correlation is found between CO2 emissions efficiency and its marginal abatement cost. For a 1% increase in CO2 emissions efficiency, the CO2 marginal abatement cost declines by 102 Yuan (in 2004 constant price). The results imply that improving CO2 emissions efficiency plays an important role in marginal abatement cost reduction, and it also provides us a new approach to reduce abatement cost besides the technical progress. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 97
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] How has China's urban compactness affected urban CO2 abatement costs?
    Yin, Kai
    Yao, Xin
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2025, 211
  • [32] Will regional economic integration influence carbon dioxide marginal abatement costs? Evidence from Chinese panel data
    He, Weijun
    Wang, Bo
    Danish
    Wang, Zhaohua
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2018, 74 : 263 - 274
  • [33] Residential gas supply, gas losses and CO2 emissions in China
    Li, Ying
    Chiu, Yung-Ho
    Cen, Hongyi
    Wang, Yujie
    Lin, Tai-Yu
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 83
  • [35] Regional allocation of CO2 emissions allowance over provinces in China by 2020
    Wang, Ke
    Zhang, Xian
    Wei, Yi-Ming
    Yu, Shiwei
    ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 54 : 214 - 229
  • [36] Efficiency and marginal abatement cost of PM2.5 in China: A parametric approach
    Cheng, Shixiong
    Lu, Kai
    Liu, Wei
    Xiao, De
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 235 : 57 - 68
  • [37] Research on the economic abatement pathway of carbon peaking in China based on marginal abatement costs and abatement tasks allocation
    Wei Li
    Hongqing Ma
    Can Lu
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 7956 - 7972
  • [38] Do marginal abatement costs matter for improving air quality? Evidence from China?s major cities
    Ji, D. J.
    Zhou, P.
    Wu, F.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 286
  • [39] Optimal path for controlling CO2 emissions in China: A perspective of efficiency analysis
    Zhou, P.
    Sun, Z. R.
    Zhou, D. Q.
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2014, 45 : 99 - 110
  • [40] Metafroniter energy efficiency with CO2 emissions and its convergence analysis for China
    Li, Ke
    Lin, Boqiang
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2015, 48 : 230 - 241