Forcing and feedback in the MPI-ESM-LR coupled model under abruptly quadrupled CO2

被引:134
作者
Block, K. [1 ,2 ]
Mauritsen, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Meteorol, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Leipzig, Inst Meteorol, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
RADIATIVE KERNEL TECHNIQUE; CLIMATE FEEDBACKS; TROPOSPHERIC ADJUSTMENT; SEA-ICE; CLOUD; SENSITIVITY; SPREAD; CCSM3;
D O I
10.1002/jame.20041
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Radiative feedback mechanisms associated with temperature, water vapor, cloud, and surface albedo change determine climate sensitivity to radiative forcing. Here we use the linearized radiative kernel-technique in combination with a Gregory analysis to determine the strength and structure of feedbacks, as well as direct and adjusted CO2 forcings in the coupled Max Planck Institute Earth System Model at base resolution (MPI-ESM-LR). We show that the combined Kernel-Gregory approach yields an elegant separation of surface temperature-dependent feedbacks from contributions to radiative forcing by fast adjustments. MPI-ESM-LR exhibits a relatively large cloud adjustment of nearly 2 W m(-2) in direct response to quadrupled CO2, with positive cloud adjustment evident throughout the tropics, subtropics and over most landmasses whereas midlatitude storm tracks contribute negatively. The model features a nonlinear regression of radiation imbalance to global mean surface temperature change, resulting in a significantly increasing effective climate sensitivity after about 20 years which is approximately at temperatures 4-5 K above preindustrial. This feature is not uncommon among climate models and is relevant for future climate projections. We analyze the contribution of the individual feedback processes to this behavior and discuss possible origins such as differential ocean warming patterns associated with deep-ocean heat uptake or state dependencies of the feedback processes.
引用
收藏
页码:676 / 691
页数:16
相关论文
共 39 条
[21]   Climate Feedbacks in CCSM3 under Changing CO2 Forcing. Part II: Variation of Climate Feedbacks and Sensitivity with Forcing [J].
Jonko, Alexandra K. ;
Shell, Karen M. ;
Sanderson, Benjamin M. ;
Danabasoglu, Gokhan .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2013, 26 (09) :2784-2795
[22]   Climate Feedbacks in CCSM3 under Changing CO2 Forcing. Part I: Adapting the Linear Radiative Kernel Technique to Feedback Calculations for a Broad Range of Forcings [J].
Jonko, Alexandra K. ;
Shell, Karen M. ;
Sanderson, Benjamin M. ;
Danabasoglu, Gokhan .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2012, 25 (15) :5260-5272
[23]   Assessment of different metrics for physical climate feedbacks [J].
Klocke, Daniel ;
Quaas, Johannes ;
Stevens, Bjorn .
CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2013, 41 (5-6) :1173-1185
[24]   Climate feedback efficiency and synergy [J].
Mauritsen, Thorsten ;
Graversen, Rune G. ;
Klocke, Daniel ;
Langen, Peter L. ;
Stevens, Bjorn ;
Tomassini, Lorenzo .
CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2013, 41 (9-10) :2539-2554
[25]   The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment [J].
Moss, Richard H. ;
Edmonds, Jae A. ;
Hibbard, Kathy A. ;
Manning, Martin R. ;
Rose, Steven K. ;
van Vuuren, Detlef P. ;
Carter, Timothy R. ;
Emori, Seita ;
Kainuma, Mikiko ;
Kram, Tom ;
Meehl, Gerald A. ;
Mitchell, John F. B. ;
Nakicenovic, Nebojsa ;
Riahi, Keywan ;
Smith, Steven J. ;
Stouffer, Ronald J. ;
Thomson, Allison M. ;
Weyant, John P. ;
Wilbanks, Thomas J. .
NATURE, 2010, 463 (7282) :747-756
[26]   Clarifying ozone emission spectra [J].
Pierrehumbert, Ray .
PHYSICS TODAY, 2011, 64 (05) :64-64
[27]   The time-dependence of climate sensitivity [J].
Senior, CA ;
Mitchell, JFB .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2000, 27 (17) :2685-2688
[28]  
Shell KM, 2008, J CLIMATE, V21, P2269, DOI [10.1175/2007JCLI2044.1, 10.1175/2007JCL12044.1]
[29]  
Soden BJ, 2004, J CLIMATE, V17, P3661, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<3661:OTUOCF>2.0.CO
[30]  
2