Benjamin Constant's history of philosophy

被引:1
作者
Krotov, Artem A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lomonosov Moscow State Univ, 1 Leninskie Gory, Moscow 119991, Russia
来源
VESTNIK SANKT-PETERBURGSKOGO UNIVERSITETA-FILOSOFIYA I KONFLIKTOLOGIYA | 2020年 / 36卷 / 02期
关键词
Benjamin Constant; French liberalism; history of philosophy; French Revolution; French philosophy of 19th century;
D O I
10.21638/spbu17.2020.202
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
The article analyses the concept of a prominent representative of early French Romanticism, considers his division of the historical process into periods and his idea on the meaning of history. According to Constant, history is not uniform in a political sense. The lack of understanding this important truth by the rulers has always brought untold sufferings to their subjects. Constant's philosophy of history is based on the idea of improving the human race, typical for the intellectual culture of the Age of Enlightenment, to which he gave a new sound, contraposing the spirit of war with the spirit of trade. Distinguishing between two types of freedom, he associated the first variety with the tradition of ancient people's assemblies, collective direct decisions, and the second with the system of representative government. His periodization of world history concretizes the idea of progress as a fundamental law of nature. He included psychological elements into his interpretation of the meaning of revolutionary events. Treating inequality as the basis of social adversity, he attributed independence in deeds, choice of life's priorities, personal security, the right to own property, and the ability to express and defend different opinions as the most important human freedoms. Expressed clearly in a number of Constant's works is the desire to distance himself from the various opposing parties, to appear as an unbiased observer, and a sage guiding his efforts to the common good. This corresponded greatly to the ideal of a philosopher represented on the pages of d'Alembert and Diderot's famous "Encyclopedie." At the same time, his doctrine represents a certain rethinking of the Enlightenment legacy, carried out through the lens of the experience of revolutionary times. Hence the demand to limit popular sovereignty, criticism of Russoism, a unique concept of the evolution of religion.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 239
页数:13
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Constan B., 1982, ESTETIKA RANNEGO FRA, P248
[2]  
Constant B., 1986, L ESPRIT CONQUETE L
[3]  
Constant B., 1836, COURS POLITIQUE CONS, V1-2
[4]  
Constant B., 2010, ECRITS POLITIQUES
[5]  
Constant Benjamin., 1988, FORCE GOUVERNEMENT A
[6]  
Constant Benjamin, 2013, ADOLPHE
[7]  
Fedorova M., 2004, Ocherki istorii zapadnoevropeiskogo liberalizma (XVII-XIX vv.), P120
[8]  
Fedosova E. I., 2001, FRANTSUZSKII LIBERAL, P80
[9]  
Gradovskij A. D., 1899, SOBRANIE SOCHINENII, V3, P133
[10]  
Las Case E. de, 2018, MEMORIAL SAINTE HELE