Use of the metastatic breast cancer progression (MBC-P) questionnaire to assess the value of progression-free survival for women with metastatic breast cancer

被引:26
|
作者
Hurvitz, Sara A. [1 ]
Lalla, Deepa [2 ]
Crosby, Ross D. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Mathias, Susan D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Palo Alto Outcomes Res, Palo Alto, CA USA
[3] Hlth Outcomes Solut, Winter Pk, FL USA
[4] Neuropsychiat Res Inst, Fargo, ND USA
[5] Univ N Dakota, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Fargo, ND USA
关键词
Metastatic breast cancer; Progression-free survival; Quality of life; Questionnaire; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; THERAPY; ADJUVANT;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-013-2734-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
While overall survival (OS) has historically been the primary endpoint for clinical trials in oncology, progression-free survival (PFS) has gained acceptance as a valuable surrogate endpoint. However, there are no known published reports about the value of PFS from the patient's perspective. We developed a questionnaire that included items regarding quality of life (QoL) and the importance of different treatment outcomes and presented hypothetical scenarios for which respondents were asked to indicate their preferences concerning treatments as they relate to PFS. 282 women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), ranging in age from 21 to 80 years completed an online version of this questionnaire. The majority of women (66 %) had been diagnosed with MBC within the previous 3 years and 56 % had been told their MBC had progressed. When asked to rank five treatment characteristics from most important to least important, respondents ranked "extending PFS" as the second most important treatment outcome after OS. When presented with a hypothetical scenario of two women receiving different treatments, respondents preferred the treatment that resulted in longer PFS (16 vs. 12 months), even when OS and side effects were assumed to be equal. Specifically, when asked to consider which woman within the hypothetical scenario had better QoL, physical functioning, and emotional well-being, respondents more often chose the woman who experienced longer PFS (QoL: 40 vs. 6 %; physical functioning: 32 vs. 8 %; emotional well-being: 58 vs. 6 %) compared to the woman within the hypothetical scenario who had a shorter time of progression. Respondents rated their own QoL highest after being told their MBC was responding to treatment (mean score 76.6) versus after the initial diagnosis of breast cancer and MBC (68.5 and 60.3). These findings suggest that extending PFS is an important treatment outcome and, from a patient perspective, improves overall QoL, physical functioning, and emotional well-being.
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 609
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact on overall survival and progression free survival of local treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer
    Maffuz-Aziz, Antonio
    Aldaneli Arredondo-Rodriguez, Bibiana
    Labastida-Almendaro, Sonia
    Alberto Tenorio-Torres, Juan
    Carbajal-Saldana, Brenda
    Rodriguez-Cuevas, Sergio
    GACETA MEXICANA DE ONCOLOGIA, 2014, 13 (02): : 106 - 111
  • [22] Soluble VE-cadherin in metastatic breast cancer: an independent prognostic factor for both progression-free survival and overall survival
    Rochefort, Pauline
    Chabaud, Sylvie
    Pierga, Jean-Yves
    Tredan, Olivier
    Brain, Etienne
    Bidard, Francois-Clement
    Schiffler, Camille
    Polena, Helena
    Khalil-Mgharbel, Abir
    Vilgrain, Isabelle
    Bachelot, Thomas
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 116 (03) : 356 - 361
  • [23] Soluble VE-cadherin in metastatic breast cancer: an independent prognostic factor for both progression-free survival and overall survival
    Pauline Rochefort
    Sylvie Chabaud
    Jean-Yves Pierga
    Olivier Tredan
    Etienne Brain
    François-Clément Bidard
    Camille Schiffler
    Helena Polena
    Abir Khalil-Mgharbel
    Isabelle Vilgrain
    Thomas Bachelot
    British Journal of Cancer, 2017, 116 : 356 - 361
  • [24] Progression-free survival as a primary endpoint in clinical trials of metastatic colorectal cancer
    Gill, S.
    Berry, S.
    Biagi, J.
    Butts, C.
    Buyse, M.
    Chen, E.
    Jonker, D.
    Marginean, C.
    Samson, B.
    Stewart, J.
    Thirlwell, M.
    Wong, R.
    Maroun, J. A.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2011, 18 : S5 - S10
  • [25] The impact of radiological assessment schedules on progression-free survival in metastatic breast cancer: A systemic review and meta-analysis
    Dabush, Dor Reuven
    Shepshelovich, Daniel
    Shochat, Tzippy
    Tibau, Ariadna
    Amir, Eitan
    Goldvaser, Hadar
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2021, 100
  • [26] Multigene methylation analysis of enriched circulating tumor cells associates with poor progression-free survival in metastatic breast cancer patients
    Benezeder, Theresa
    Tiran, Verena
    Treitler, Alexandra A. N.
    Suppan, Christoph
    Rossmann, Christopher
    Stoeger, Herbert
    Cote, Richard J.
    Datar, Ram H.
    Balic, Marija
    Dandachi, Nadia
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (54) : 92483 - 92496
  • [27] Surrogacy of progression free survival for overall survival in metastatic breast cancer studies: Meta-analyses of published studies
    Kundu, Madan G.
    Acharyya, Suddhasatta
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2017, 53 : 20 - 28
  • [28] Trastuzumab Beyond Progression for HER2 Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Progression-Free Survival on First-Line Therapy Predicts Overall Survival Impact
    Rayson, Daniel
    Lutes, Sarah
    Walsh, Gordon
    Sellon, Marlene
    Colwell, Bruce
    Dorreen, Mark
    Drucker, Arik
    Jeyakumar, Alwin
    Younis, Tallal
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2014, 20 (04) : 408 - 413
  • [29] Psychological Reactions to Progression of Metastatic Breast Cancer - An Interview Study
    Svensson, Helene
    Brandberg, Yvonne
    Einbeigi, Zakaria
    Hatschek, Thomas
    Ahlberg, Karin
    CANCER NURSING, 2009, 32 (01) : 55 - 63
  • [30] Prolonged time to progression with fulvestrant for metastatic breast cancer
    Mello, Celso A. L.
    Chinen, Ludmilla T. D.
    Severino da Silva, Samantha Cabral
    Matias, Carolina do Nascimento
    Benevides, Carlos Frederico
    Gimenes, Daniel Luiz
    Fanelli, Marcello F.
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 28 (02) : 416 - 419