Green loan and subsidy for promoting clean production innovation

被引:282
作者
Li, Zhenghui [1 ,2 ]
Liao, Gaoke [3 ]
Wang, Zhenzhen [4 ]
Huang, Zhehao [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Int Inst Finance, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Univ, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Univ, Coll Finance & Stat, Changsha 410006, Hunan, Peoples R China
[4] South China Univ Technol, Sch Math, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
上海市自然科学基金;
关键词
Green loan; Subsidy; Game models; Technique innovation; Environmental protection; EMISSIONS TRADING SCHEME; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATIONS; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; CO2; EMISSIONS; GAME-THEORY; CHINA; MODEL; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.066
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Green loan has attracted worldwide attention in recent years due to the increasingly striking environmental problems caused by economic activities. This paper considers a game on the application of green loans for technique innovation among the enterprises, banks and government, and addresses the effectiveness of green loan and government subsidy on promoting clean production. Serial profit-risk models are established and then solved according to the intention of enterprises to technique innovation for promoting clean production. Energy emission is selected as a measure capturing the production effects on environment in this paper. The conditions that enterprises execute technique innovation with loans and that banks approve loans for enterprises are derived. Two threshold values on technique maturity are presented to support these conditions. The most importantly, it is rigorously proved that green loan subsidy provided by the government could improve environmental quality through reducing the energy emissions from enterprises. It is also shown that subsidy not only improves the intention of enterprises to technique innovation, but also increases the innovation risks. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 431
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Transition to Clean Technology [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Akcigit, Ufuk ;
Hanley, Douglas ;
Kerr, William .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2016, 124 (01) :52-104
[2]   Green Innovation and Financial Performance: An Institutional Approach [J].
Aguilera-Caracuel, Javier ;
Ortiz-de-Mandojana, Natalia .
ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 26 (04) :365-385
[3]   Credit supply and corporate innovation [J].
Amore, Mario Daniele ;
Schneider, Cedric ;
Zaldokas, Alminas .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 109 (03) :835-855
[4]   Banks and innovation: Microeconometric evidence on Italian firms [J].
Benfratello, Luigi ;
Schiantarelli, Fabio ;
Sembenelli, Alessandro .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 90 (02) :197-217
[5]   Necessity as the mother of "green' inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations [J].
Berrone, Pascual ;
Fosfuri, Andrea ;
Gelabert, Liliana ;
Gomez-Mejia, Luis R. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (08) :891-909
[6]   Innovation-receiving subsidiaries and dual embeddedness: impact on business performance [J].
Bresciani, Stefano ;
Ferraris, Alberto .
BALTIC JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2016, 11 (01) :108-130
[7]   Law, Stock Markets, and Innovation [J].
Brown, James R. ;
Martinsson, Gustav ;
Petersen, Bruce C. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2013, 68 (04) :1517-1549
[8]   Decomposing inequality in energy-related CO2 emissions by source and source increment: The roles of production and residential consumption [J].
Chen, Jiandong ;
Cheng, Shulei ;
Song, Malin .
ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 107 :698-710
[9]   The driver of green innovation and green image - Green core competence [J].
Chen, Yu-Shan .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2008, 81 (03) :531-543
[10]   Effects of carbon tax on social welfare: A case study of China [J].
Chen, Zi-Yue ;
Nie, Pu-Yan .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 183 :1607-1615