Collective action and community-driven development in rural and urban Indonesia

被引:42
作者
Beard, Victoria A.
Dasgupta, Aniruddha
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Planning Policy & Design, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] World Bank, Infrastruct Dept, E Asia & Pacific Urban Dev Unit, Washington, DC 20433 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00420980600749944
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The article analyses differences in collective action in rural and urban communities that participated in a poverty alleviation project in Indonesia. It was found that the main determinants of collective action are relationships among multiscalar social, political and historical factors, internal and external to communities. Two distinct forms of collective action are also identified. The first form is based on community cohesion, stable social relationships and adherence to social hierarchy. The second form is based on a community's perception of an interdependent future and a shared desire for structural change. Both forms of collective action are effective in delivering project resources to beneficiaries; however, only the second form demonstrates potential for social transformation.
引用
收藏
页码:1451 / 1468
页数:18
相关论文
共 99 条
[71]  
Olson M., 1971, LOGIC COLLECTIVE ACT
[72]  
Ostrom E., 1992, Crafting Institutions for Self-governing Irrigation Systems
[73]   Social capital: One or many? Definition and measurement [J].
Paldam, M .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2000, 14 (05) :629-653
[74]  
Peattie L., 1968, VIEW BARRIO
[75]   Monitoring elite capture in community-driven development [J].
Platteau, JP .
DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2004, 35 (02) :223-246
[77]   Heterogeneity, group size and collective action: The role of institutions in forest management [J].
Poteete, AR ;
Ostrom, E .
DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2004, 35 (03) :435-461
[78]   COMMON PROPERTY, EQUALITY, AND DEVELOPMENT [J].
QUIGGIN, J .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1993, 21 (07) :1123-1138
[79]  
Rigg Jonathan., 1997, SE ASIA HUMAN LANDSC
[80]   MODELS OF NEIGHBORHOOD CHANGE [J].
SCHWIRIAN, KP .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 1983, 9 :83-102