Instructional Approaches That Significantly Increase Reading Comprehension

被引:27
作者
Block, Cathy Collins [1 ]
Parris, Sheri R. [2 ]
Reed, Kelly L. [2 ]
Whiteley, Cinnamon S. [3 ]
Cleveland, Maggie D. [4 ]
机构
[1] Texas Christian Univ, Sch Educ, Ft Worth, TX 76129 USA
[2] Univ N Texas, Dept Counseling Dev & Higher Educ, Denton, TX 76203 USA
[3] Darnestown Elementary Sch, Gaithersburg, MD USA
[4] Tanglewood Elementary Sch, Ft Worth, TX USA
关键词
reading comprehension; elementary reading instruction; struggling readers; silent reading; effective literacy instruction; DISCOURSE; TIME; CLASSROOM; KNOWLEDGE; PRESCHOOL; TEACHERS; CHILDREN; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1037/a0014319
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of the most widely used literacy instructional approaches on the reading comprehension of Grade 2-6 students. Participants (N = 660) were enrolled in 4 districts in the United States: 53% were male (n = 348) and 47% were female (n = 312); 51% were Caucasian (n = 338), 23% were African American (n = 149), 21% were Hispanic (n = 138), and 5% represented other ethnic backgrounds (n = 35). Sixty-two percent came from low to low-middle socioeconomic status schools, and 38% came from middle to high socioeconomic status schools. The study was a quantified experimental versus controlled group comparison. Analyses of variance were used to determine the differences between literacy scores. Two-level hierarchical linear modeling analyses were used to examine the effects of school variables on academic achievement. The highest comprehension scores for all populations occurred through three approaches. When struggling readers received 20 min of instruction with I of these 3 approaches, their literacy growth was equal to or greater than that of their peers. Implications are that treatments using classroom books produced significantly higher comprehension scores than workbook practice or extending basal treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 281
页数:20
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
Adams M.J., 1990, BEGINNING READ THINK
[2]  
ALEXANDER PA, 1997, ANN M AM ED RES ASS
[3]  
ALLINGTON RL, 2004, BIG BROTHER NATL REA
[4]  
Anderson R.C., 1984, Learning to Read in American Schools: Basal Readers and Content Texts, P243
[5]   FRAMEWORKS FOR COMPREHENDING DISCOURSE [J].
ANDERSON, RC ;
REYNOLDS, RE ;
SCHALLERT, DL ;
GOETZ, ET .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 1977, 14 (04) :367-381
[6]   GROWTH IN READING AND HOW CHILDREN SPEND THEIR TIME OUTSIDE OF SCHOOL [J].
ANDERSON, RC ;
WILSON, PT ;
FIELDING, LG .
READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1988, 23 (03) :285-303
[7]  
ANDERSON RC, 1984, HDB READING RES, P341
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2000, TEACH CHILDR READ EV
[9]  
[Anonymous], MAK DIFF MEANS MAK I
[10]  
Au KH, 2002, COMPREHENSIVE READING INSTRUCTION ACROSS THE GRADE LEVELS, P70