Conversational functions of 'I know', 'you know' and 'we know' in collaborative writing of primary school children

被引:8
作者
Herder, Anke [1 ,2 ]
Berenst, Jan [2 ]
de Glopper, Kees [1 ]
Koole, Tom [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Ctr Language & Cognit Groningen CLCG, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] NHL Stenden Univ Appl Sci, Ctr Discourse & Learning, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
[3] Univ Witwatersrand, Sch Human & Community Dev, Johannesburg, South Africa
关键词
Epistemic access; epistemic stance; collaborative writing; peer talk; conversation analysis; PEER INTERACTION; KNOWLEDGE; ORGANIZATION; TALK; CREATIVITY; AUTHORITY; CLASSROOM; RESPONSES; DESIGN; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1080/19463014.2020.1814368
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper discusses how primary school students, who are writing together in the context of inquiry learning, explicitly orient to knowing of oneself and others within the peer group. Using Conversation Analysis, we disclose the conversational functions of assertions holding 'I know', 'you know' and 'we know'. First, students position themselves as knowledgeable, to (i) express a preannouncement of a proposal, (ii) respond to a request for information and (iii) reinforce an assertion with use of an evidential. Second, students claim equal epistemic access, as a response to an action that conveys epistemic authority of a peer. Third, students indicate shared knowledge with other participants, to (i) pursue agreement, (ii) check the epistemic status of a co-participant, (iii) reject a proposal for grounds of relevance and (iv) mark shared, newfound knowledge. The different practices are discussed in terms of epistemics in conversation and dialogic writing.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 31
页数:31
相关论文
共 85 条
[71]   SIMPLEST SYSTEMATICS FOR ORGANIZATION OF TURN-TAKING FOR CONVERSATION [J].
SACKS, H ;
SCHEGLOFF, EA ;
JEFFERSON, G .
LANGUAGE, 1974, 50 (04) :696-735
[72]  
Schegloff E.A., 2002, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, V22, P3, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0267190502000016
[73]  
Schleppegrell M.J., 2001, LINGUIST EDUC, V12, P431, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0898-5898(01)00073-0, 10.1016/s0898-5898(01)00073-0]
[74]   Remembering and understanding with oh-prefaced yes/no declaratives in Dutch [J].
Seuren, Lucas M. ;
Huiskes, Mike ;
Koole, Tom .
JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 2016, 104 :180-192
[75]   "Who knows best?" Evidentiality and epistemic asymmetry in conversation [J].
Sidnell, Jack .
PRAGMATICS AND SOCIETY, 2012, 3 (02) :294-320
[76]   Three orders in the organization of human action: On the interface between knowledge, power, and emotion in interaction and social relations [J].
Stevanovic, Melisa ;
Perakyla, Anssi .
LANGUAGE IN SOCIETY, 2014, 43 (02) :185-207
[77]   Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide [J].
Stevanovic, Melisa ;
Perakyla, Anssi .
RESEARCH ON LANGUAGE AND SOCIAL INTERACTION, 2012, 45 (03) :297-321
[78]  
Stivers T., 2011, MORALITY KNOWLEDGE C, P3, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511921674.002, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511921674.002]
[79]   Interactional and epistemic challenges in students' help-seeking in sessions of mathematical homework support: presenting the problem [J].
Svahn, Johanna ;
Bowden, Helen Melander .
CLASSROOM DISCOURSE, 2021, 12 (03) :193-213
[80]  
Tree JEF, 2002, J PRAGMATICS, V34, P727