Genomic imprinting in plants and mammals: how life history constrains convergence

被引:39
|
作者
Scott, R. J. [1 ]
Spielman, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Dept Biol & Biochem, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
关键词
D O I
10.1159/000090815
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
In both flowering plants and mammals, DNA methylation is involved in silencing alleles of imprinted genes, but surprising differences in imprinting control are emerging between the two taxa which may be traced to differences in their life cycles. Imprinted gene expression in plants occurs in the endosperm, a separate fertilisation product which transmits nutrients to the embryo and does not contribute a genome to the next generation. Regulation of expression of the known imprinted genes in Arabidopsh, involves a cascade of gene expression beginning in the gametophyte, a haploid life phase interposed between the meiotic products and the gametes, which evolved from free-living organisms that constitute the dominant life phase of lower plants. Although the gametophytes of flowering plants are highly reduced they still express large numbers of genes, perhaps reflecting their evolutionary legacy, and which may now be recruited for control of imprinting. Strikingly, the genes at the top of the expression cascade appear to be specifically activated by demethylation, rather than targeted for silencing. Unlike in mammals, there is no evidence for global resetting of methylation in plants, and although imprinting involves the activity of a maintenance methyltransferase, de novo methyltransferases do not appear to be required. Plants do not set aside a germline; instead the cells that undergo meiosis to produce gametophytes differentiate in the adult plant during flower development. Both the late differentiation of the lineage producing germ cells, and the extent of gene expression during the haploid phase, may be incompatible with global resetting of methylation. Resetting may be unnecessary in any case because the adult plant expresses imprinted loci either biallelically or not at all, suggesting there is no chromosomal memory of parent-of-origin in the lineage that produces the gametophytes. Thus several features of the plant life cycle may account for the different strategies used by plants and animals to regulate parent-specific gene expression. Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 67
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Convergent evolution of genomic imprinting in plants and mammals
    Feil, Robert
    Berger, Frederic
    TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2007, 23 (04) : 192 - 199
  • [2] Genomic imprinting in mammals
    Konyukhov, BV
    Platonov, ES
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS, 2001, 37 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [3] Genomic Imprinting in Mammals
    B. V. Konyukhov
    E. S. Platonov
    Russian Journal of Genetics, 2001, 37 : 1 - 12
  • [4] Genomic Imprinting in Mammals
    Barlow, Denise P.
    Bartolomei, Marisa S.
    COLD SPRING HARBOR PERSPECTIVES IN BIOLOGY, 2014, 6 (02):
  • [5] Genomic imprinting in mammals
    Bartolomei, MS
    Tilghman, SM
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF GENETICS, 1997, 31 : 493 - 525
  • [6] How Demography, Life History, and Kinship Shape the Evolution of Genomic Imprinting
    Van Cleve, Jeremy
    Feldman, Marcus W.
    Lehmann, Laurent
    AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2010, 176 (04): : 440 - 455
  • [7] The origins of genomic imprinting in mammals
    Sleutels, F
    Barlow, DP
    HOMOLOGY EFFECTS, 2002, 46 : 119 - 163
  • [8] Genomic imprinting and culture in mammals
    Brown, WM
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2001, 24 (02) : 328 - +
  • [9] Genomic imprinting in epigenetic of mammals
    E. S. Platonov
    D. A. Isaev
    Russian Journal of Genetics, 2006, 42 : 1030 - 1042
  • [10] Genomic imprinting mechanisms in mammals
    Ideraabdullah, Folami Y.
    Vigneau, Sebastien
    Bartolomei, Marisa S.
    MUTATION RESEARCH-FUNDAMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF MUTAGENESIS, 2008, 647 (1-2) : 77 - 85