The right to health as the basis for universal health coverage: A cross-national analysis of national medicines policies of 71 countries

被引:20
|
作者
Perehudoff, S. Katrina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Alexandrov, Nikita V. [1 ]
Hogerzeil, Hans V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Hlth Sci, Global Hlth Unit, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Ghent, Int Ctr Reprod Hlth, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Ghent, Belgium
来源
PLOS ONE | 2019年 / 14卷 / 06期
关键词
DRUG POLICIES; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0215577
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Persistent barriers to universal access to medicines are limited social protection in the event of illness, inadequate financing for essential medicines, frequent stock-outs in the public sector, and high prices in the private sector. We argue that greater coherence between human rights law, national medicines policies, and universal health coverage schemes can address these barriers. We present a cross-national content analysis of national medicines policies from 71 countries published between 1990-2016. The World Health Organization's ( WHO) 2001 guidelines for developing and implementing a national medicines policy and all 71 national medicines policies were assessed on 12 principles, linking a health systems approach to essential medicines with international human rights law for medicines affordability and financing for vulnerable groups. National medicines policies most frequently contain measures for medicines selection and efficient spending/cost-effectiveness. Four principles ( legal right to health; government financing; efficient spending; and financial protection of vulnerable populations) are significantly stronger in national medicines policies published after 2004 than before. Six principles have remained weak or absent: pooling user contributions, international cooperation, and four principles for good governance. Overall, South Africa ( 1996), Indonesia and South Sudan ( 2006), Philippines ( 2011-2016), Malaysia ( 2012), Somalia ( 2013), Afghanistan ( 2014), and Uganda ( 2015) include the most relevant texts and can be used as models for other settings. We conclude that WHO's 2001 guidelines have guided the content and language of many subsequent national medicines policies. WHO and national policy makers can use these principles and the practical examples identified in our study to further align national medicines policies with human rights law and with Target 3.8 for universal access to essential medicines in the Sustainable Development Goals.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] NATIONAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH: A CROSS-NATIONAL AGGREGATE ANALYSIS
    Schultz, David
    MEDICINE LAW & SOCIETY, 2022, 15 (02): : 241 - 252
  • [2] Legislating for universal access to medicines: a rights-based cross-national comparison of UHC laws in 16 countries
    Perehudoff, S. Katrina
    Alexandrov, Nikita, V
    Hogerzeil, Hans, V
    HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2019, 34 : 48 - 57
  • [3] Right-to-Medicines Litigation and Universal Health Coverage: Institutional Determinants of the Judicialization of Health in Brazil
    Socal, Mariana P.
    Amon, Joseph J.
    Biehl, Joao
    HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS, 2020, 22 (01) : 221 - 235
  • [4] Adopting localised health financing models for universal health coverage in Low and middle-income countries: lessons from the National Health lnsurance Scheme in Ghana
    Domapielle, Maximillian Kolbe
    HELIYON, 2021, 7 (06)
  • [5] A cross-national comparative perspective on racial inequities in health: the USA versus Canada
    Siddiqi, A.
    Nguyen, Q. C.
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2010, 64 (01) : 29 - 35
  • [6] Multi-layer health insurance coverage, medical services use and health in a Universal National Health System, the case of Portugal
    Tavares, Aida Isabel
    Marques, Ines
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2021, 22 (01) : 141 - 153
  • [7] National Primary Care Policy 2017: analysis of teams composition and national coverage of Family Health
    Brito E Souza Gomes, Clarice
    Gutierrez, Adriana Coser
    Soranz, Daniel
    CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2020, 25 (04): : 1327 - 1337
  • [8] Examining equity in health insurance coverage: an analysis of Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme
    Dake, Fidelia A. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2018, 17
  • [9] Access to medicines by ambulatory health service users in Mexico: an analysis of the national health surveys 1994 to 2006
    Wirtz, Veronika J.
    Russo, Giuliano
    de la Luz Kageyama-Escobar, Ma
    SALUD PUBLICA DE MEXICO, 2010, 52 (01): : 30 - 38
  • [10] Equally inequitable? A cross-national comparative study of racial health inequalities in the United States and Canada
    Ramraj, Chantel
    Shahidi, Faraz Vahid
    Darity, William, Jr.
    Kawachi, Ichiro
    Zuberi, Daniyal
    Siddiqi, Arjumand
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2016, 161 : 19 - 26