Efficacy of Pectoral Nerve Block Type II for Breast-Conserving Surgery and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

被引:58
作者
Kim, Doo-Hwan [1 ]
Kim, Sooyoung [1 ]
Kim, Chan Sik [1 ]
Lee, Sukyung [1 ]
Lee, In-Gyu [1 ]
Kim, Hee Jeong [2 ]
Lee, Jong-Hyuk [1 ]
Jeong, Sung-Moon [1 ]
Choi, Kyu Taek [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Div Breast & Endocrine Surg,Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
THORACIC PARAVERTEBRAL BLOCK; RADICAL-MASTECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; CANCER SURGERY; PAIN;
D O I
10.1155/2018/4315931
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives. The pectoral nerve block type II (PECS II block) is widely used for postoperative analgesia after breast surgery. This study evaluated the analgesic efficacy of PECS II block in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB). Methods. Patients were randomized to the control group (n = 40) and the PECS II group (n = 40). An ultrasound-guided PECS II block was performed after induction of anesthesia. The primary outcome measure was opioid consumption, and the secondary outcome was pain at the breast and axillary measured using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)24 hours after surgery. Opioid requirement was assessed according to tumor location. Results. Opioid requirement was lower in the PECS II than in the control group (43.8 +/- 28.5 g versus 77.0 +/- 41.9 g, p < 0.001). However, the frequency of rescue analgesics did not differ between these groups. Opioid consumption in the PECS II group was significantly lower in patients with tumors in the outer area than that in patients with tumors in the inner area (32.5 +/- 23.0 g versus 58.0 +/- 29.3 g, p = 0.007). The axillary NRS was consistently lower through 24 hr in the PECS II group. Conclusion. Although the PECS II block seemed to reduce pain intensity and opioid requirements for 24 h after BCS and SNB, these reductions may not be clinically significant. This trial is registered with Clinical Research Information Service KCT0002509.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] de la Torre PA, 2017, REV BRAS ANESTESIOL, V67, P555, DOI [10.1016/j.bjan.2016.10.009, 10.1016/j.bjane.2015.04.007]
  • [2] Predictive factors for the development of persistent pain after breast cancer surgery
    Andersen, Kenneth Geving
    Duriaud, Helle Molter
    Jensen, Helle Elisabeth
    Kroman, Niels
    Kehlet, Henrik
    [J]. PAIN, 2015, 156 (12) : 2413 - 2422
  • [3] Pectoral Nerves I and II Blocks in Multimodal Analgesia for Breast Cancer Surgery A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Bashandy, Ghada Mohammad Nabih
    Abbas, Dina Nabil
    [J]. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2015, 40 (01) : 68 - 74
  • [4] Ultrasound description of Pecs II (modified Pecs I): A novel approach to breast surgery
    Blanco, R.
    Fajardo, M.
    Parras Maldonado, T.
    [J]. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION, 2012, 59 (09): : 470 - 475
  • [5] Risks and benefits of thoracic epidural anaesthesia
    Freise, H.
    Van Aken, H. K.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 107 (06) : 859 - 868
  • [6] Kashiwagi S., 2012, JCT, V3, P810, DOI DOI 10.42361/JCT.2012.325102
  • [7] Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention
    Kehlet, H
    Jensen, TS
    Woolf, CJ
    [J]. LANCET, 2006, 367 (9522) : 1618 - 1625
  • [8] Kim H, 2017, KOREAN J ANESTHESIOL, V70, P77, DOI 10.4097/kjae.2017.70.1.77
  • [9] Efficacy of pectoral nerve block versus thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia after radical mastectomy: a randomized controlled trial
    Kulhari, S.
    Bharti, N.
    Bala, I.
    Arora, S.
    Singh, G.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 117 (03) : 382 - 386
  • [10] THORACIC EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA IMPROVES OUTCOME AFTER BREAST SURGERY
    LYNCH, EP
    WELCH, KJ
    CARABUENA, JM
    EBERLEIN, TJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1995, 222 (05) : 663 - 669