External validation of genomic classifier-based risk-stratification tool to identify candidates for adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with prostate cancer

被引:3
|
作者
Lee, David I. [1 ]
Shahait, Mohammed [2 ,3 ]
Dalela, Deepansh [4 ]
Keeley, Jacob [4 ]
Lal, Priti [5 ]
Vapiwala, Neha [6 ]
Abdollah, Firas [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Surg, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] King Hussein Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Amman, Jordan
[3] Henry Ford Hosp, Vattikuti Urol Inst VUI, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Dept Pathol, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Dept Radiat Oncol, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Wayne State Univ, Detroit, MI USA
[7] Henry Ford Hosp, VUI Ctr Outcomes Res Analyt & Evaluat, Vattikuti Urol Inst VUI, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
关键词
Prostate cancer; Biomarkers; Radiation; Adjuvant; Radical prostatectomy; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; SALVAGE RADIOTHERAPY; FEATURES; MEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-020-03540-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To externally validate a Genomic Classifier (GC) based risk-stratification nomogram identifying candidates who would benefit from adjuvant radiation (aRT) therapy after radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods We identified 350 patients who underwent RP, between 2013 and 2018, and had adverse pathological features (positive margin, and/or pT3a or higher) on final pathology. Genomic profile was available for all these men. The clinical recurrence-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The external validity of the nomogram was tested using the concordance index (c-index), calibration plot, and decision curve analysis. Results The median follow-up of the cohort was 26.5 months. Overall, 14% of the patients received aRT. During the follow-up period, 3.4% of the patients developed metastasis. Overall 3-year metastasis-free survival was 95% (95% CI 0.92-0.98). The c-index of the nomogram was 0.84. The calibration of the model was favorable. Decision-curve analysis showed a positive net benefit for probabilities ranging between 0.01 and 0.09, with the highest difference at threshold probability around 0.05. At that threshold, the net benefit is 0.06 for the model and 0 for treating all the patients. Conclusion Our report is the first to confirm the validity of this genomic-based risk-stratification tool in identifying men who might benefit from aRT after RP. As such, it can be a useful instrument to be incorporated in shared decision making on whether administration of aRT will lead to a clinically meaningful benefit. Such a model can also be useful for patients' classification in future clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:3217 / 3222
页数:6
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [41] Effect of adding androgen deprivation therapy to permanent iodine-125 implantation with or without external beam radiation therapy on the outcomes in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis
    Sutani, Shinya
    Yorozu, Atsunori
    Toya, Kazuhito
    Shiraishi, Yutaka
    Nishiyama, Toru
    Yagi, Yasuto
    Nakamura, Ken
    Saito, Shiro
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2021, 20 (01) : 10 - 18
  • [42] Significant Effect of Carbon-Ion Radiation Therapy Combined With Androgen Deprivation on Biochemical Recurrence Rates in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: A Two-Center Controlled Trial Compare With X-Ray External Beam Radiation Therapy
    Zhao, Xue
    Sakamoto, Shinichi
    Ishikawa, Hitoshi
    Yamada, Yasutaka
    Aoki, Shuri
    Nakajima, Mio
    Sato, Kodai
    Kobayashi, Kana
    Saito, Shinpei
    Wakatsuki, Masaru
    Ichikawa, Tomohiko
    PROSTATE, 2025, 85 (03) : 232 - 242
  • [43] The Oral Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Receptor Antagonist Relugolix as Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant Androgen Deprivation Therapy to External Beam Radiotherapy in Patients with Localised Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer: A Randomised, Open-label, Parallel-group Phase 2 Trial
    Dearnaley, David P.
    Saltzstein, Daniel R.
    Sylvester, John E.
    Karsh, Lawrence
    Mehlhaff, Bryan A.
    Pieczonka, Christopher
    Bailen, James L.
    Shi, Hongliang
    Ye, Zhan
    Faessel, Helene M.
    Lin, Huamao
    Zhu, Yanyan
    Saad, Fred
    MacLean, David B.
    Shore, Neal D.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 78 (02) : 184 - 192
  • [44] Can Extreme Dose Escalation With External Beam Radiation Therapy and Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Boost Obviate the Need for Long-Term Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Patients With High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer?
    King, Martin T.
    Orio, Peter F.
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2024, 118 (02): : 402 - 403
  • [45] An assessment of PTV margin definitions for patients undergoing conformal 3D external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer based on an analysis of 10,327 pretreatment daily ultrasound localizations
    Poli, M. Esmeralda Ramos
    Parker, William
    Patrocinio, Horacio
    Souhami, Luis
    Shenouda, George
    Campos, Leticia Lucente
    Podgorsak, Ervin B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 67 (05): : 1430 - 1437