External validation of genomic classifier-based risk-stratification tool to identify candidates for adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with prostate cancer

被引:3
|
作者
Lee, David I. [1 ]
Shahait, Mohammed [2 ,3 ]
Dalela, Deepansh [4 ]
Keeley, Jacob [4 ]
Lal, Priti [5 ]
Vapiwala, Neha [6 ]
Abdollah, Firas [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Surg, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] King Hussein Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Amman, Jordan
[3] Henry Ford Hosp, Vattikuti Urol Inst VUI, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Dept Pathol, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Dept Radiat Oncol, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Wayne State Univ, Detroit, MI USA
[7] Henry Ford Hosp, VUI Ctr Outcomes Res Analyt & Evaluat, Vattikuti Urol Inst VUI, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
关键词
Prostate cancer; Biomarkers; Radiation; Adjuvant; Radical prostatectomy; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; SALVAGE RADIOTHERAPY; FEATURES; MEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-020-03540-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To externally validate a Genomic Classifier (GC) based risk-stratification nomogram identifying candidates who would benefit from adjuvant radiation (aRT) therapy after radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods We identified 350 patients who underwent RP, between 2013 and 2018, and had adverse pathological features (positive margin, and/or pT3a or higher) on final pathology. Genomic profile was available for all these men. The clinical recurrence-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The external validity of the nomogram was tested using the concordance index (c-index), calibration plot, and decision curve analysis. Results The median follow-up of the cohort was 26.5 months. Overall, 14% of the patients received aRT. During the follow-up period, 3.4% of the patients developed metastasis. Overall 3-year metastasis-free survival was 95% (95% CI 0.92-0.98). The c-index of the nomogram was 0.84. The calibration of the model was favorable. Decision-curve analysis showed a positive net benefit for probabilities ranging between 0.01 and 0.09, with the highest difference at threshold probability around 0.05. At that threshold, the net benefit is 0.06 for the model and 0 for treating all the patients. Conclusion Our report is the first to confirm the validity of this genomic-based risk-stratification tool in identifying men who might benefit from aRT after RP. As such, it can be a useful instrument to be incorporated in shared decision making on whether administration of aRT will lead to a clinically meaningful benefit. Such a model can also be useful for patients' classification in future clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:3217 / 3222
页数:6
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [21] THE RATE OF SECONDARY MALIGNANCIES AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY VERSUS EXTERNAL BEAM RADIATION THERAPY FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER: A POPULATION-BASED STUDY ON 17,845 PATIENTS
    Bhojani, Naeem
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Jeldres, Claudio
    Isbarn, Hendrik
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Graefen, Markus
    Arjane, Philippe
    Duclos, Alain
    Lattouf, Jean-Baptiste
    Saad, Fred
    Valiquette, Luc
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Perrotte, Paul
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (02): : 342 - 348
  • [22] Assessing the Optimum Use of Androgen-Deprivation Therapy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing External Beam Radiation Therapy
    Ludwig, Michelle S.
    Kuban, Deborah A.
    Strom, Sara S.
    Du, Xianglin L.
    Lopez, David S.
    Yamal, Jose-Miguel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2017, 11 (01) : 73 - 81
  • [23] Outcomes and toxicities in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy alone or brachytherapy and supplemental external beam radiation therapy
    Markovic, Emily Schlussel
    Buckstein, Michael
    Stone, Nelson N.
    Stock, Richard G.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 121 (05) : 774 - 780
  • [24] PSA based review of adjuvant and salvage radiation therapy vs. observation in postoperative prostate cancer patients
    Peschel, RE
    Robnett, TJ
    Hesse, D
    King, CR
    Ennis, RD
    Schiff, PB
    Wilson, LD
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 90 (01) : 29 - 36
  • [25] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging versus Partin tables and the Memorial Sloan-Kettering cancer center nomogram in risk stratification of patients with prostate cancer referred to external beam radiation therapy
    Rossano Girometti
    Martina Pancot
    Marco Andrea Signor
    Martina Urbani
    Luca Balestreri
    Chiara Zuiani
    La radiologia medica, 2018, 123 : 778 - 787
  • [26] POPULATION-BASED STUDY OF CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY AMONG PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER TREATED WITH RADICAL EXTERNAL BEAM RADIATION THERAPY WITH AND WITHOUT ADJUVANT ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION THERAPY AT THE BRITISH COLUMBIA CANCER AGENCY
    Kim, Julian
    Vaid, Moninder
    Tyldesley, Scott
    Woods, Ryan
    Pickles, Tom
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 80 (03): : 742 - 750
  • [27] External beam radiation therapy with or without low-dose-rate brachytherapy: Analysis of favorable and unfavorable intetinediate-risk prostate cancer patients
    Abugharib, Ahmed E.
    Dess, Robert T.
    Soni, Payal D.
    Narayana, Vrinda
    Evans, Cheryl
    Gaber, Mohamed S.
    Feng, Felix Y.
    McLaughlin, Patrick W.
    Spratt, Daniel E.
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2017, 16 (04) : 782 - 789
  • [28] Differential outcomes of re-stratified high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiation therapy plus high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost
    Carignan, Damien
    Morales, Brandon
    Despres, Philippe
    Foster, William
    Martin, Andre-Guy
    Vigneault, Eric
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2024, 16 (02) : 103 - 110
  • [29] A New Risk Classification System for Therapeutic Decision Making with Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Dose-escalated External-beam Radiation Therapy
    Zumsteg, Zachary S.
    Spratt, Daniel E.
    Pei, Isaac
    Zhang, Zhigang
    Yamada, Yoshiya
    Kollmeier, Marisa
    Zelefsky, Michael J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 64 (06) : 895 - 902
  • [30] A Genomic Classifier Improves Prediction of Metastatic Disease Within 5 Years After Surgery in Node-negative High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Managed by Radical Prostatectomy Without Adjuvant Therapy
    Klein, Eric A.
    Yousefi, Kasra
    Haddad, Zaid
    Choeurng, Voleak
    Buerki, Christine
    Stephenson, Andrew J.
    Li, Jianbo
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina
    Davicioni, Elai
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (04) : 778 - 786