External validation of genomic classifier-based risk-stratification tool to identify candidates for adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with prostate cancer

被引:3
|
作者
Lee, David I. [1 ]
Shahait, Mohammed [2 ,3 ]
Dalela, Deepansh [4 ]
Keeley, Jacob [4 ]
Lal, Priti [5 ]
Vapiwala, Neha [6 ]
Abdollah, Firas [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Surg, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] King Hussein Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Amman, Jordan
[3] Henry Ford Hosp, Vattikuti Urol Inst VUI, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Dept Pathol, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Dept Radiat Oncol, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Wayne State Univ, Detroit, MI USA
[7] Henry Ford Hosp, VUI Ctr Outcomes Res Analyt & Evaluat, Vattikuti Urol Inst VUI, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
关键词
Prostate cancer; Biomarkers; Radiation; Adjuvant; Radical prostatectomy; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; SALVAGE RADIOTHERAPY; FEATURES; MEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-020-03540-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To externally validate a Genomic Classifier (GC) based risk-stratification nomogram identifying candidates who would benefit from adjuvant radiation (aRT) therapy after radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods We identified 350 patients who underwent RP, between 2013 and 2018, and had adverse pathological features (positive margin, and/or pT3a or higher) on final pathology. Genomic profile was available for all these men. The clinical recurrence-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The external validity of the nomogram was tested using the concordance index (c-index), calibration plot, and decision curve analysis. Results The median follow-up of the cohort was 26.5 months. Overall, 14% of the patients received aRT. During the follow-up period, 3.4% of the patients developed metastasis. Overall 3-year metastasis-free survival was 95% (95% CI 0.92-0.98). The c-index of the nomogram was 0.84. The calibration of the model was favorable. Decision-curve analysis showed a positive net benefit for probabilities ranging between 0.01 and 0.09, with the highest difference at threshold probability around 0.05. At that threshold, the net benefit is 0.06 for the model and 0 for treating all the patients. Conclusion Our report is the first to confirm the validity of this genomic-based risk-stratification tool in identifying men who might benefit from aRT after RP. As such, it can be a useful instrument to be incorporated in shared decision making on whether administration of aRT will lead to a clinically meaningful benefit. Such a model can also be useful for patients' classification in future clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:3217 / 3222
页数:6
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] External validation of genomic classifier-based risk-stratification tool to identify candidates for adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with prostate cancer
    David I. Lee
    Mohammed Shahait
    Deepansh Dalela
    Jacob Keeley
    Priti Lal
    Neha Vapiwala
    Firas Abdollah
    World Journal of Urology, 2021, 39 : 3217 - 3222
  • [2] Genomic Classifier Augments the Role of Pathological Features in Identifying Optimal Candidates for Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in Patients With Prostate Cancer: Development and Internal Validation of a Multivariable Prognostic Model
    Dalela, Deepansh
    Santiago-Jimenez, Maria
    Yousefi, Kasra
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Ross, Ashley E.
    Den, Robert B.
    Freedland, Stephen J.
    Schaeffer, Edward M.
    Dicker, Adam P.
    Menon, Mani
    Briganti, Alberto
    Davicioni, Elai
    Abdollah, Firas
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (18) : 1982 - +
  • [3] External validation of the ProCaRS nomograms and comparison of existing risk-stratification tools for localized prostate cancer
    Tiberi, David
    Rodrigues, George
    Pickles, Tom
    Morris, Jim
    Crook, Juanita
    Martin, Andre-Guy
    Cury, Fabio
    Catton, Charles
    Lukka, Himu
    Warner, Andrew
    Taussky, Daniel
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2017, 11 (3-4): : 94 - 100
  • [4] When to perform bone scan in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer: external validation of a novel risk stratification tool
    De Nunzio, Cosimo
    Leonardo, Costantino
    Franco, Giorgio
    Esperto, Francesco
    Brassetti, Aldo
    Simonelli, Giovanni
    Dente, Dino
    De Dominicis, Carlo
    Tubaro, Andrea
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 31 (02) : 365 - 369
  • [5] The Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) in patients treated with external beam radiation therapy: Evaluation and optimization in patients at higher risk of relapse
    Halverson, Schuyler
    Schipper, Matthew
    Blas, Kevin
    Lee, Vivien
    Sabolch, Aaron
    Olson, Karin
    Sandler, Howard M.
    Feng, Felix Y.
    Hamstra, Daniel A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 101 (03) : 513 - 520
  • [6] Validation of a Metastatic Assay using biopsies to improve risk stratification in patients with prostate cancer treated with radical radiation therapy
    Jain, S.
    Lyons, C. A.
    Walker, S. M.
    McQuaid, S.
    Hynes, S. O.
    Mitchell, D. M.
    Pang, B.
    Logan, G. E.
    McCavigan, A. M.
    O'Rourke, D.
    McArt, D. G.
    McDade, S. S.
    Mills, I. G.
    Prise, K. M.
    Knight, L. A.
    Steele, C. J.
    Medlow, P. W.
    Berge, V.
    Katz, B.
    Loblaw, D. A.
    Harkin, D. P.
    James, J. A.
    O'Sullivan, J. M.
    Kennedy, R. D.
    Waugh, D. J.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29 (01) : 215 - 222
  • [7] Limitations of the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) Prognostic Tool for Prediction of Metastases and Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality in Patients Treated With External Beam Radiation Therapy
    Vainshtein, Jeffrey M.
    Schipper, Matthew
    Vance, Sean
    Feng, Felix Y.
    Olson, Karin B.
    Hamstra, Daniel A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2016, 39 (02): : 173 - 180
  • [8] External validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection among patients with high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer
    Eri Fukagawa
    Shinya Yamamoto
    Sachiko Ohde
    Kasumi Kaneko Yoshitomi
    Kosuke Hamada
    Yusuke Yoneoka
    Motohiro Fujiwara
    Ryo Fujiwara
    Tomohiko Oguchi
    Yoshinobu Komai
    Noboru Numao
    Takeshi Yuasa
    Iwao Fukui
    Junji Yonese
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2021, 26 : 1736 - 1744
  • [9] External validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection among patients with high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer
    Fukagawa, Eri
    Yamamoto, Shinya
    Ohde, Sachiko
    Yoshitomi, Kasumi Kaneko
    Hamada, Kosuke
    Yoneoka, Yusuke
    Fujiwara, Motohiro
    Fujiwara, Ryo
    Oguchi, Tomohiko
    Komai, Yoshinobu
    Numao, Noboru
    Yuasa, Takeshi
    Fukui, Iwao
    Yonese, Junji
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 26 (09) : 1736 - 1744
  • [10] Genomic Prostate Cancer Classifier Predicts Biochemical Failure and Metastases in Patients After Postoperative Radiation Therapy
    Den, Robert B.
    Feng, Felix Y.
    Showalter, Timothy N.
    Mishra, Mark V.
    Trabulsi, Edouard J.
    Lallas, Costas D.
    Gomella, Leonard G.
    Kelly, W. Kevin
    Birbe, Ruth C.
    Mccue, Peter A.
    Ghadessi, Mercedeh
    Yousefi, Kasra
    Davicioni, Elai
    Knudsen, Karen E.
    Dicker, Adam P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 89 (05): : 1038 - 1046