Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer: associations between diffusion metrics and histological prognostic factors

被引:26
|
作者
Kim, Jin You [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Jin Joo [1 ]
Kim, Suk [1 ]
Choo, Ki Seok [3 ]
Kim, Ahrong [4 ]
Kang, Taewoo [5 ]
Park, Heesung [5 ]
机构
[1] Pusan Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, 1-10 Ami Dong, Busan 602739, South Korea
[2] Pusan Natl Univ, Sch Med, Med Res Inst, Busan, South Korea
[3] Pusan Natl Univ, Yangsan Hosp, Dept Radiol, Yangsan, South Korea
[4] Pusan Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Busan, South Korea
[5] Pusan Natl Univ Hosp, Busan Canc Ctr, Busan, South Korea
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Diffusion tensor imaging; Anisotropy; Breast neoplasms; Prognosis; INVASIVE DUCTAL CARCINOMA; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; HISTOGRAM ANALYSIS; PROSTATE-CANCER; COEFFICIENT; MRI; GRADE; DIFFERENTIATION; LESIONS; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-018-5429-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To investigate whether quantitative diffusion metrics derived from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) are associated with histological prognostic factors in breast cancer patients. This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was waived. Between 2016 and 2017, 251 consecutive women (mean age, 53.8 years) with breast cancer (230 invasive, 21 in situ) who underwent preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with DTI were identified. Diffusion gradients were applied in 20 directions (b values, 0 and 1,000 s/mm(2)). DTI metrics - mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA) - were measured for breast lesions and contralateral normal breast by two radiologists and were correlated with histological findings using the Mann-Whitney U-test and linear regression analysis. MD and FA were significantly lower for breast cancers than for normal fibroglandular tissues (1.03 +/- 0.25x10(-3) mm(2)/s vs. 1.60 +/- 0.19x10(-3) mm(2)/s, p < 0.001 and 0.29 +/- 0.09 vs. 0.33 +/- 0.06, p < 0.001, respectively). Significant differences were observed in MD between invasive cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions (p < 0.001). Multivariate linear analysis showed that larger size (> 2 cm) (p = 0.007), high histological grade (grade 3) (p = 0.045) and axillary node metastasis (p = 0.009) were significantly associated with lower MD in invasive breast cancer patients. Larger size (p < 0.001) and high histological grade (p = 0.025) were significantly associated with lower FA. DTI-derived diffusion metrics, such as MD and FA, are associated with histological prognostic factors in breast cancer patients. aEuro cent MD was significantly lower for breast cancers than for normal breast tissues. aEuro cent FA was significantly lower for breast cancers than for normal breast tissues. aEuro cent Reduced DTI metrics were associated with poor prognostic factors of breast cancer. aEuro cent DTI may provide valuable information concerning biological aggressiveness in breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:3185 / 3193
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer: associations between diffusion metrics and histological prognostic factors
    Jin You Kim
    Jin Joo Kim
    Suk Kim
    Ki Seok Choo
    Ahrong Kim
    Taewoo Kang
    Heesung Park
    European Radiology, 2018, 28 : 3185 - 3193
  • [2] Association between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values on Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Prognostic Factors of Breast Cancer
    Ng, W. K.
    Wong, C. K. K.
    Fung, E. P. Y.
    Wong, C. W.
    Mak, W. S.
    Kwok, K. M.
    Lam, H. S.
    Cho, H. Y.
    HONG KONG JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 22 (02): : 98 - 106
  • [3] Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer characterisation: correlations between the apparent diffusion coefficient and major prognostic factors
    Belli, Paolo
    Costantini, Melania
    Bufi, Enida
    Giardina, Giuseppe Giovanni
    Rinaldi, Pierluigi
    Franceschini, Gianluca
    Bonomo, Lorenzo
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2015, 120 (03): : 268 - 276
  • [4] Can 3.0 Tesla diffusion tensor Imaging parameters be prognostic indicators in breast cancer?
    Ozal, Safiye Tokgoz
    Inci, Ercan
    Gemici, Aysegul Akdogan
    Turgut, Hurriyet
    Cikot, Murat
    Karabulut, Mehmet
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2018, 51 : 240 - 247
  • [5] Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Parameters in Breast Cancer and Correlation With the Prognostic Factors
    Onaygil, Can
    Kaya, Handan
    Ugurlu, Mustafa Umit
    Aribal, Erkin
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2017, 45 (03) : 660 - 672
  • [6] Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
    Nissan, Noam
    Furman-Haran, Edna
    Feinberg-Shapiro, Myra
    Grobgeld, Dov
    Eyal, Erez
    Zehavi, Tania
    Degani, Hadassa
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2014, (94):
  • [7] Correlation of gleason scores with magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer
    Li, Liang
    Margolis, Daniel J. A.
    Deng, Ming
    Cai, Jie
    Yuan, Ling
    Feng, Zhaoyan
    Min, Xiangde
    Hu, Zhiquan
    Hu, Daoyu
    Liu, Jihong
    Wang, Liang
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 42 (02) : 460 - 467
  • [8] Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: a pilot study
    Baltzer, Pascal A. T.
    Schaefer, Anja
    Dietzel, Matthias
    Graessel, David
    Gajda, Mieczyslaw
    Camara, Oumar
    Kaiser, Werner A.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [9] Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging-derived apparent diffusion coefficient and its association with histological prognostic factors in breast cancer
    Ren, Congcong
    Zou, Yu
    Zhang, Xiaodan
    Li, Kui
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 18 (03) : 3295 - 3303
  • [10] Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of the normal breast
    Partridge, Savannah C.
    Murthy, Revathi S.
    Ziadloo, Ali
    White, Steven W.
    Allison, Kimberly H.
    Lehman, Constance D.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2010, 28 (03) : 320 - 328