Development of a checklist of standard items for processing individual participant data from randomised trials for meta-analyses: Protocol for a modified e-Delphi study

被引:6
作者
Hunter, Kylie E. [1 ]
Webster, Angela C. [1 ]
Clarke, Mike [2 ]
Page, Matthew J. [3 ]
Libesman, Sol [1 ]
Godolphin, Peter J. [4 ]
Aberoumand, Mason [1 ]
Rydzewska, Larysa H. M. [4 ]
Wang, Rui [5 ]
Tan, Aidan C. [1 ]
Li, Wentao [5 ]
Mol, Ben W. [5 ]
Willson, Melina [1 ]
Brown, Vicki [6 ]
Palacios, Talia [1 ]
Seidler, Anna Lene [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, NHMRC Clin Trials Ctr, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
[2] Queens Univ Belfast, Ctr Publ Hlth, Sch Med Dent & Biomed Sci, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[3] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Methods Evidence Synth Unit, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] UCL, MRC Clin Trials Unit, London, England
[5] Monash Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Monash Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Deakin Univ, Fac Hlth, Sch Hlth & Social Dev, Inst Hlth Transformat,Deakin Hlth Econ, Burwood, Vic, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
METHODOLOGY; IPD;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0275893
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Individual participant data meta-analyses enable detailed checking of data quality and more complex analyses than standard study-level synthesis of summary data based on publications. However, there is limited existing guidance on the specific systematic checks that should be undertaken to confirm and enhance data quality for individual participant data meta-analyses and how to conduct these checks. We aim to address this gap by developing a checklist of items for data quality checking and cleaning to be applied to individual participant data meta-analyses of randomised trials. This study will comprise three phases: 1) a scoping review to identify potential checklist items; 2) two e-Delphi survey rounds among an invited panel of experts followed by a consensus meeting; and 3) pilot testing and refinement of the checklist, including development of an accompanying R-markdown program to facilitate its uptake.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Understanding systematic reviews and meta-analysis [J].
Akobeng, AK .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2005, 90 (08) :845-848
[2]  
Allaire J., 2021, rmarkdown: Dynamic documents for R, DOI DOI 10.1186/S40795-020-00400-4
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Qualtrics
[4]  
Black A., 2020, Dimensions of Data Quality (DDQ)
[5]  
Black A, 2020, How to Select the Right Dimensions of Data Quality
[6]   Two different invitation approaches for consecutive rounds of a Delphi survey led to comparable final outcome [J].
Boel, Anne ;
Navarro-Compan, Victoria ;
Landewe, Robert ;
van der Heijde, Desiree .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 129 :31-39
[7]   Methods to assess research misconduct in health-related research: A scoping review [J].
Bordewijk, Esmee M. ;
Li, Wentao ;
van Eekelen, Rik ;
Wang, Rui ;
Showell, Marian ;
Mol, Ben W. ;
van Wely, Madelon .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 136 :189-202
[8]  
Braun V., 2006, Qual Res Psychol, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, DOI 10.1080/10875549.2021.1929659, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
[9]   The management of Otitis Media with Effusion in children with cleft palate (mOMEnt): a feasibility study and economic evaluation [J].
Bruce, Iain ;
Harman, Nicola ;
Williamson, Paula ;
Tierney, Stephanie ;
Callery, Peter ;
Mohiuddin, Syed ;
Payne, Katherine ;
Fenwick, Elisabeth ;
Kirkham, Jamie ;
O'Brien, Kevin .
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2015, 19 (68) :1-+
[10]   PRIME-IPD SERIES Part 3. The PRIME-IPD tool fills a gap in guidance for preparing IPD for analysis [J].
Dewidar, Omar ;
Riddle, Alison ;
Ghogomu, Elizabeth ;
Hossain, Alomgir ;
Arora, Paul ;
Bhutta, Zulfiqar A. ;
Black, Robert E. ;
Cousens, Simon ;
Mathew, Christine ;
Trawin, Jessica ;
Tugwell, Peter ;
Welch, Vivian ;
Wells, George A. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 136 :224-226