Importance-Performance Analysis in Public Transportation: Methodological Revision for Practical Implementation

被引:17
作者
Rodriguez-Valencia, Alvaro [1 ]
Rosas-Satizabal, Daniel [2 ]
Paris, David [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ los Andes, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Bogota, Colombia
[2] Univ los Andes, Urban & Reg Sustainabil Res Grp, Bogota, Colombia
关键词
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; SERVICE QUALITY;
D O I
10.1177/0361198118825125
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Importance-performance analysis (IPA) is a common and accepted method used by service industries to improve their service and therefore increase customer satisfaction. In public transportation, it has been adopted to assess the attributes of transit system. To analyze the practical implementation of IPA in transit user satisfaction studies, an extensive literature review was carried out to identify challenges. Unlike the "performance" dimension, measuring "importance" is challenging, given the wide variety of approaches and specific methods. For practical application, choosing a specific method in a specific approach has diverse implications. Real-world transit user satisfaction surveys of three different bus transit (sub) systems in Bogota were used to try, test, and compare results, methods, applications, and-from a practical perspective-to identify the pitfalls, risks, difficulties, advantages, and biases of using different techniques to measure importance in relation to public transportation services. At the end of the paper, the advantages and shortcomings of different importance measurement methods are synthesized, and easy-to-implement suggestions for practitioners are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:710 / 723
页数:14
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Aiken L. S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions, DOI 10.2307/2348581
  • [2] Examining airline service quality from a process perspective
    Chen, FY
    Chang, YH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2005, 11 (02) : 79 - 87
  • [3] Deploying effective service strategy in the operations stage of high-speed rail
    Chou, Jui-Sheng
    Kim, Changwan
    Kuo, Yao-Chen
    Ou, Nai-Chi
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2011, 47 (04) : 507 - 519
  • [4] Chumney E.C., 2006, Methods and Designs for Outcomes Research
  • [5] Quality of Service in Public Transport Based on Customer Satisfaction Surveys: A Review and Assessment of Methodological Approaches
    de Ona, Juan
    de Ona, Rocio
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE, 2015, 49 (03) : 605 - 622
  • [6] Dillman D.A., 2014, INTERNET PHONE MAIL, VFourth
  • [7] Customer Loyalty and Chicago, Illinois, Transit Authority Buses Results from 2008 Customer Satisfaction Survey
    Figler, Scott A.
    Sriraj, P. S.
    Welch, Eric W.
    Yavuz, Nilay
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2011, (2216) : 148 - 156
  • [8] Defining TransMilenio Users' Value and Satisfaction through the Lean Thinking Approach
    Garcia-Suarez, Carlos
    Rivera-Perez, Andres L.
    Rodriguez-Valencia, Alvaro
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2018, 2672 (08) : 455 - 463
  • [9] Urban transport interchanges: A methodology for evaluating perceived quality
    Hernandez, Sara
    Monzon, Andres
    Ona, Rocio de
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2016, 84 : 31 - 43
  • [10] Imam R., 2014, International Journal of Business and Management, V9, P106, DOI [10.5539/ijbm.v9n6p106, DOI 10.5539/IJBM.V9N6P106]