A systematic review of experiences of advanced practice nursing in general practice

被引:49
作者
Jakimowicz, Michael [1 ]
Williams, Danielle [2 ]
Stankiewicz, Grazyna [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Sch Hlth Sci, 1 Leichhardt St, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Sch Hlth Sci, Private Bag 135, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[3] Univ Tasmania, Sch Hlth Sci, Locked Bag 5052, Alexandria, NSW 2015, Australia
关键词
Advanced practice; General practice; Systematic review; Qualitative research; PRACTICE NURSES; BARRIERS; CARE; PRACTITIONERS; ROLES; BOUNDARIES; ENABLERS; INSULIN; PEOPLE; TIME;
D O I
10.1186/s12912-016-0198-7
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Despite efforts to achieve conceptual clarity, advanced practice nursing continues to reside in a liminal space, unable to secure ongoing recognition as a viable means of healthcare delivery. This is particularly evident in general practice where advanced practice role development is more fluid and generally less supported by the hierarchical structures evident in the hospital system. This review synthesises published qualitative studies reporting experiences of advanced practice nursing in general practice. The panoramic view provided by patients, nurses and doctors within this novel context, offers a fresh perspective on why advanced practice nurses have struggled to gain acceptance within the healthcare milieu. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of qualitative studies that explored the experiences of patients, nurses and doctors who had contact with advanced practice nurses working in general practice. Published work from 1990 to June 2016 was located using CINAHL and PubMed. The full text of relevant studies was retrieved after reading the title and abstract. Critical appraisal was undertaken and the findings of included studies were analysed using the constant comparative method. Emergent codes were collapsed into sub-themes and themes. Results: Twenty articles reporting the experiences of 486 participants were included. We identified one major theme: legitimacy; and three sub-themes: (1) establishing and maintaining confidence in the advanced practice nurse, (2) strengthening and weakening boundaries between general practitioners and advanced practice nurses and (3) establishing and maintaining the value of advanced practice nursing. Conclusions: We set out to describe experiences of advanced practice nursing in general practice. We discovered that general practitioners and patients continue to have concerns around responsibility, trust and accountability. Additionally, advanced practice nurses struggle to negotiate and clarify scopes of practice while general practitioners have trouble justifying the costs associated with advanced practice nursing roles. Therefore, much work remains to establish and maintain the legitimacy of advanced practice nursing in general practice.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Advanced practice nursing: A concept analysis [J].
Dowling, Maura ;
Beauchesne, Michelle ;
Farrelly, Frances ;
Murphy, Kathy .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2013, 19 (02) :131-140
[32]   Molding the future of advanced practice nursing [J].
Cronenwett, Linda R. .
NURSING OUTLOOK, 2012, 60 (05) :241-248
[33]   Remote consultations in general practice - A systematic review [J].
Vodicka, Stasa ;
Zelko, Erika .
ZDRAVSTVENO VARSTVO, 2022, 61 (04) :224-230
[34]   Telephone consultations for general practice: a systematic review [J].
Downes, Martin J. ;
Mervin, Merehau C. ;
Byrnes, Joshua M. ;
Scuffham, Paul A. .
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6
[35]   Telephone consultations for general practice: a systematic review [J].
Martin J Downes ;
Merehau C Mervin ;
Joshua M Byrnes ;
Paul A Scuffham .
Systematic Reviews, 6
[36]   Telemedicine for general practice: A systematic review protocol [J].
Downes M.J. ;
Mervin M.C. ;
Byrnes J.M. ;
Scuffham P.A. .
Systematic Reviews, 4 (1)
[37]   General practice pharmacists in Australia: A systematic review [J].
Sudeshika, Thilini ;
Naunton, Mark ;
Deeks, Louise S. ;
Thomas, Jackson ;
Peterson, Gregory M. ;
Kosari, Sam .
PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (10)
[38]   Management of gout in general practice—a systematic review [J].
Andrew Jeyaruban ;
Sarah Larkins ;
Muriel Soden .
Clinical Rheumatology, 2015, 34 :9-16
[39]   Exercise on prescription in general practice: A systematic review [J].
Sorensen, JB ;
Skovgaard, T ;
Puggaard, L .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2006, 24 (02) :69-74
[40]   Point-of-Care Ultrasound in General Practice: A Systematic Review [J].
Andersen, Camilla Aakjaer ;
Holden, Sinead ;
Vela, Jonathan ;
Rathleff, Michael Skovdal ;
Jensen, Martin Bach .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2019, 17 (01) :61-69