A systematic review of experiences of advanced practice nursing in general practice

被引:49
作者
Jakimowicz, Michael [1 ]
Williams, Danielle [2 ]
Stankiewicz, Grazyna [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Sch Hlth Sci, 1 Leichhardt St, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Sch Hlth Sci, Private Bag 135, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[3] Univ Tasmania, Sch Hlth Sci, Locked Bag 5052, Alexandria, NSW 2015, Australia
关键词
Advanced practice; General practice; Systematic review; Qualitative research; PRACTICE NURSES; BARRIERS; CARE; PRACTITIONERS; ROLES; BOUNDARIES; ENABLERS; INSULIN; PEOPLE; TIME;
D O I
10.1186/s12912-016-0198-7
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Despite efforts to achieve conceptual clarity, advanced practice nursing continues to reside in a liminal space, unable to secure ongoing recognition as a viable means of healthcare delivery. This is particularly evident in general practice where advanced practice role development is more fluid and generally less supported by the hierarchical structures evident in the hospital system. This review synthesises published qualitative studies reporting experiences of advanced practice nursing in general practice. The panoramic view provided by patients, nurses and doctors within this novel context, offers a fresh perspective on why advanced practice nurses have struggled to gain acceptance within the healthcare milieu. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of qualitative studies that explored the experiences of patients, nurses and doctors who had contact with advanced practice nurses working in general practice. Published work from 1990 to June 2016 was located using CINAHL and PubMed. The full text of relevant studies was retrieved after reading the title and abstract. Critical appraisal was undertaken and the findings of included studies were analysed using the constant comparative method. Emergent codes were collapsed into sub-themes and themes. Results: Twenty articles reporting the experiences of 486 participants were included. We identified one major theme: legitimacy; and three sub-themes: (1) establishing and maintaining confidence in the advanced practice nurse, (2) strengthening and weakening boundaries between general practitioners and advanced practice nurses and (3) establishing and maintaining the value of advanced practice nursing. Conclusions: We set out to describe experiences of advanced practice nursing in general practice. We discovered that general practitioners and patients continue to have concerns around responsibility, trust and accountability. Additionally, advanced practice nurses struggle to negotiate and clarify scopes of practice while general practitioners have trouble justifying the costs associated with advanced practice nursing roles. Therefore, much work remains to establish and maintain the legitimacy of advanced practice nursing in general practice.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Advanced practice for children and young people: A systematic review with narrative summary [J].
Hyde, Robin ;
MacVicar, Sonya ;
Humphrey, Tracy .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2020, 76 (01) :135-146
[22]   Advanced practice nursing implementation strategies in hospital: a review of the literature [J].
Aguilard, Stephan ;
Colson, Sebastien ;
Inthavong, Karen .
SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2017, 29 (02) :241-254
[23]   Management of gout in general practice-a systematic review [J].
Jeyaruban, Andrew ;
Larkins, Sarah ;
Soden, Muriel .
CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2015, 34 (01) :9-16
[24]   Pharmacy stakeholders' views and experiences of the credentialing of advanced or specialist pharmacist practice: A mixed methods systematic review [J].
Deasy, Evelyn ;
Seoighe, Anna ;
Ryan, Cristin ;
Byrne, Stephen ;
Dalton, Kieran .
EXPLORATORY RESEARCH IN CLINICAL AND SOCIAL PHARMACY, 2024, 16
[25]   An International Survey on Advanced Practice Nursing Education, Practice, and Regulation [J].
Pulcini, Joyce ;
Jelic, Monika ;
Gul, Raisa ;
Loke, Alice Yuen .
JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2010, 42 (01) :31-39
[26]   Difficulties with the sickness certification process in general practice and possible solutions: A systematic review [J].
Letrilliart, Laurent ;
Barrau, Anne .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2012, 18 (04) :219-228
[27]   Advanced practice nursing: representations of actors in this new model [J].
Aghnatios, Matthieu ;
Darloy, Theo ;
Dictor, Julien ;
Gasparovicova, Martina ;
Drouot, Cyril ;
Gasperini, Fabrice ;
Bouchez, Tiphanie .
SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2021, 33 (04) :547-558
[28]   Identifying advanced practice: A national survey of a nursing workforce [J].
Gardner, Glenn ;
Duffield, Christine ;
Doubrovsky, Anna ;
Adams, Margaret .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2016, 55 :60-70
[29]   The effect of general practice team composition and climate on staff and patient experiences: a systematic review [J].
Abrams, Ruth ;
Jones, Bridget ;
Campbell, John ;
de Lusignan, Simon ;
Peckham, Stephen ;
Gage, Heather .
BJGP OPEN, 2024, 8 (01)
[30]   Advanced practice nursing: a concept analysis [J].
Olimpio, Jessica de Araujo ;
de Medeiros Araujo, Jessica Naiara ;
Pitombeira, Danielly Oliveira ;
Enders, Bertha Cruz ;
Sonenberg, Andrea ;
Vitor, Allyne Fortes .
ACTA PAULISTA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2018, 31 (06) :674-680