A systematic review of experiences of advanced practice nursing in general practice

被引:48
作者
Jakimowicz, Michael [1 ]
Williams, Danielle [2 ]
Stankiewicz, Grazyna [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Sch Hlth Sci, 1 Leichhardt St, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Sch Hlth Sci, Private Bag 135, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[3] Univ Tasmania, Sch Hlth Sci, Locked Bag 5052, Alexandria, NSW 2015, Australia
来源
BMC NURSING | 2017年 / 16卷
关键词
Advanced practice; General practice; Systematic review; Qualitative research; PRACTICE NURSES; BARRIERS; CARE; PRACTITIONERS; ROLES; BOUNDARIES; ENABLERS; INSULIN; PEOPLE; TIME;
D O I
10.1186/s12912-016-0198-7
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Despite efforts to achieve conceptual clarity, advanced practice nursing continues to reside in a liminal space, unable to secure ongoing recognition as a viable means of healthcare delivery. This is particularly evident in general practice where advanced practice role development is more fluid and generally less supported by the hierarchical structures evident in the hospital system. This review synthesises published qualitative studies reporting experiences of advanced practice nursing in general practice. The panoramic view provided by patients, nurses and doctors within this novel context, offers a fresh perspective on why advanced practice nurses have struggled to gain acceptance within the healthcare milieu. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of qualitative studies that explored the experiences of patients, nurses and doctors who had contact with advanced practice nurses working in general practice. Published work from 1990 to June 2016 was located using CINAHL and PubMed. The full text of relevant studies was retrieved after reading the title and abstract. Critical appraisal was undertaken and the findings of included studies were analysed using the constant comparative method. Emergent codes were collapsed into sub-themes and themes. Results: Twenty articles reporting the experiences of 486 participants were included. We identified one major theme: legitimacy; and three sub-themes: (1) establishing and maintaining confidence in the advanced practice nurse, (2) strengthening and weakening boundaries between general practitioners and advanced practice nurses and (3) establishing and maintaining the value of advanced practice nursing. Conclusions: We set out to describe experiences of advanced practice nursing in general practice. We discovered that general practitioners and patients continue to have concerns around responsibility, trust and accountability. Additionally, advanced practice nurses struggle to negotiate and clarify scopes of practice while general practitioners have trouble justifying the costs associated with advanced practice nursing roles. Therefore, much work remains to establish and maintain the legitimacy of advanced practice nursing in general practice.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A global perspective of advanced practice nursing research: A review of systematic reviews protocol
    Kilpatrick, Kelley
    Savard, Isabelle
    Audet, Li-Anne
    Kra-Friedman, Abby
    Atallah, Renee
    Jabbour, Mira
    Zhou, Wentao
    Wheeler, Kathy
    Ladd, Elissa
    Gray, Deborah C. C.
    Henderson, Colette
    Spies, Lori A. A.
    McGrath, Heather
    Rogers, Melanie
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (01):
  • [22] Management of gout in general practice-a systematic review
    Jeyaruban, Andrew
    Larkins, Sarah
    Soden, Muriel
    CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2015, 34 (01) : 9 - 16
  • [23] Advanced practice nursing implementation strategies in hospital: a review of the literature
    Aguilard, Stephan
    Colson, Sebastien
    Inthavong, Karen
    SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2017, 29 (02): : 241 - 254
  • [24] An International Survey on Advanced Practice Nursing Education, Practice, and Regulation
    Pulcini, Joyce
    Jelic, Monika
    Gul, Raisa
    Loke, Alice Yuen
    JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2010, 42 (01) : 31 - 39
  • [25] Difficulties with the sickness certification process in general practice and possible solutions: A systematic review
    Letrilliart, Laurent
    Barrau, Anne
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2012, 18 (04) : 219 - 228
  • [26] Advanced practice nursing: representations of actors in this new model
    Aghnatios, Matthieu
    Darloy, Theo
    Dictor, Julien
    Gasparovicova, Martina
    Drouot, Cyril
    Gasperini, Fabrice
    Bouchez, Tiphanie
    SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2021, 33 (04): : 547 - 558
  • [27] The effect of general practice team composition and climate on staff and patient experiences: a systematic review
    Abrams, Ruth
    Jones, Bridget
    Campbell, John
    de Lusignan, Simon
    Peckham, Stephen
    Gage, Heather
    BJGP OPEN, 2024, 8 (01)
  • [28] Advanced practice nursing: a concept analysis
    Olimpio, Jessica de Araujo
    de Medeiros Araujo, Jessica Naiara
    Pitombeira, Danielly Oliveira
    Enders, Bertha Cruz
    Sonenberg, Andrea
    Vitor, Allyne Fortes
    ACTA PAULISTA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2018, 31 (06) : 674 - 680
  • [29] Advanced practice nursing: A concept analysis
    Dowling, Maura
    Beauchesne, Michelle
    Farrelly, Frances
    Murphy, Kathy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2013, 19 (02) : 131 - 140
  • [30] Molding the future of advanced practice nursing
    Cronenwett, Linda R.
    NURSING OUTLOOK, 2012, 60 (05) : 241 - 248