Functional Bracing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

被引:32
|
作者
Lowe, Walter R. [1 ]
Warth, Ryan J. [1 ]
Davis, Elizabeth P. [1 ]
Bailey, Lane [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Ironman Sports Med Inst, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
KNEE-BRACES; IN-VIVO; ACL RECONSTRUCTION; TIBIAL ROTATION; EXTENSION; STRAIN; NONWEIGHTBEARING; WEIGHTBEARING; FLEXION;
D O I
10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00710
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the current literature on the use of functional knee braces after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with respect to clinical and in vivo biomechanical data. Methods: A systematic search of both the PubMed and Embase databases was performed to identify all studies that reported clinical and/or in vivo biomechanical results of functional bracing versus nonbracing after ACL reconstruction. Extracted data included study design, surgical reconstruction techniques, postoperative rehabilitation protocols, objective outcomes, and subjective outcomes scores. The in vivo biomechanical data collected included kinematics, strength, function, and proprioception. Subjective clinical outcomes scores were collected when available. Quality appraisal analyses were performed using the Cochrane Collaboration tools for randomized and nonrandomized trials to aid in data interpretation. Results: Fifteen studies met the selection criteria (including 3 randomized trials [level II], 11 nonrandomized trials [level II], and 1 retrospective comparative study [level HI]), with follow-up intervals ranging from 3 to 48 months. Most studies were designed to compare the effects of functional bracing versus nonbracing on subjective and objective results in patients who underwent previous primary ACL reconstruction. Functional bracing significantly improved kinematics of the knee joint and improved gait kinetics, although functional bracing may decrease quadriceps activation without affecting functional tests, range of motion, and proprioception. Four studies reported no differences in subjective outcomes scores with brace use; however, one study reported increased patient confidence with brace use, whereas another study reported decreased pain and quicker return to work when the brace was not used. Conclusions: The effectiveness of postoperative functional bracing following ACL reconstruction remains elusive. Some data suggest that functional bracing may have some benefit with regard to in vivo knee kinematics and may offer increased protection of the implanted graft after ACL reconstruction without sacrificing function, range of motion, or proprioception. However, limited evidence exists supporting the use of routine functional bracing to decrease the rate of reinjury after ACL reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 249
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] FUNCTIONAL KNEE REHABILITATION AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION
    SAUTER, D
    VERAART, B
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 1988, 11 (03) : 286 - 290
  • [32] Greater return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction combined with anterolateral ligament reconstruction compared with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction alone: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lumban-Gaol, Imelda
    Putramega, Dananjaya
    Phatama, Krisna Yuarno
    Utomo, Dwikora Novembri
    Budhiparama, Nicolaas C.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2025, 12 (01)
  • [33] Impact of Psychological Factors on Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Nedder, Victoria J.
    Raju, Akash G.
    Moyal, Andrew J.
    Calcei, Jacob G.
    Voos, James E.
    SPORTS HEALTH-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, 2025, 17 (02): : 291 - 298
  • [34] Hamstring muscle strength before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review
    Moloney, Colum
    O'Sullivan, Kieran
    O'Farrell, Dermot
    Louw, Quinette
    Clifford, Amanda M.
    ISOKINETICS AND EXERCISE SCIENCE, 2014, 22 (03) : 225 - 236
  • [35] Return to Sport After Pediatric Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of the Criteria
    Lorange, Justin-Pierre
    Senecal, Laurianne
    Moisan, Philippe
    Nault, Marie-Lyne
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (06): : 1641 - 1651
  • [36] Efficacy of continuous passive motion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review
    Smith, Toby O.
    Davies, Leigh
    PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT, 2007, 8 (03) : 141 - 152
  • [37] Lower limb biomechanics before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review
    Moore, Joseph M.
    Cessford, Kimberly
    Willmott, Alexander P.
    Raj, Dipak
    Exell, Timothy A.
    Burbage, Jenny
    Mullineaux, David R.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2020, 106
  • [38] Hamstring Tendon Regeneration After Harvest for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Papalia, Rocco
    Franceschi, Francesco
    D'Adamio, Stefano
    Balzani, Lorenzo Diaz
    Maffulli, Nicola
    Denaro, Vincenzo
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2015, 31 (06): : 1169 - 1183
  • [39] Association of Anterior Knee Pain With Extension Deficit After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Georgoulis, Jim D.
    Savvidou, Olga D.
    Patras, Kostas
    Melissaridou, Dimitra
    Hadjimichael, Argyris C.
    Papagelopoulos, Panayiotis J.
    Georgoulis, Anastasios D.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 12 (10)
  • [40] Economic Analyses in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction A Qualitative and Systematic Review
    Saltzman, Bryan M.
    Cvetanovich, Gregory L.
    Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
    Mall, Nathan A.
    Bush-Joseph, Charles A.
    Bach, Bernard R., Jr.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (05): : 1329 - 1335