Functional Bracing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

被引:32
|
作者
Lowe, Walter R. [1 ]
Warth, Ryan J. [1 ]
Davis, Elizabeth P. [1 ]
Bailey, Lane [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Ironman Sports Med Inst, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
KNEE-BRACES; IN-VIVO; ACL RECONSTRUCTION; TIBIAL ROTATION; EXTENSION; STRAIN; NONWEIGHTBEARING; WEIGHTBEARING; FLEXION;
D O I
10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00710
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the current literature on the use of functional knee braces after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with respect to clinical and in vivo biomechanical data. Methods: A systematic search of both the PubMed and Embase databases was performed to identify all studies that reported clinical and/or in vivo biomechanical results of functional bracing versus nonbracing after ACL reconstruction. Extracted data included study design, surgical reconstruction techniques, postoperative rehabilitation protocols, objective outcomes, and subjective outcomes scores. The in vivo biomechanical data collected included kinematics, strength, function, and proprioception. Subjective clinical outcomes scores were collected when available. Quality appraisal analyses were performed using the Cochrane Collaboration tools for randomized and nonrandomized trials to aid in data interpretation. Results: Fifteen studies met the selection criteria (including 3 randomized trials [level II], 11 nonrandomized trials [level II], and 1 retrospective comparative study [level HI]), with follow-up intervals ranging from 3 to 48 months. Most studies were designed to compare the effects of functional bracing versus nonbracing on subjective and objective results in patients who underwent previous primary ACL reconstruction. Functional bracing significantly improved kinematics of the knee joint and improved gait kinetics, although functional bracing may decrease quadriceps activation without affecting functional tests, range of motion, and proprioception. Four studies reported no differences in subjective outcomes scores with brace use; however, one study reported increased patient confidence with brace use, whereas another study reported decreased pain and quicker return to work when the brace was not used. Conclusions: The effectiveness of postoperative functional bracing following ACL reconstruction remains elusive. Some data suggest that functional bracing may have some benefit with regard to in vivo knee kinematics and may offer increased protection of the implanted graft after ACL reconstruction without sacrificing function, range of motion, or proprioception. However, limited evidence exists supporting the use of routine functional bracing to decrease the rate of reinjury after ACL reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 249
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Test Batteries After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Roe, Chelsey
    Jacobs, Cale
    Hoch, Johanna
    Johnson, Darren L.
    Noehren, Brian
    SPORTS HEALTH-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, 2022, 14 (02): : 205 - 215
  • [22] Is There a Role for Internal Bracing and Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament? A Systematic Literature Review
    van Eck, Carola F.
    Limpisvasti, Orr
    ElAttrache, Neal S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (09): : 2291 - 2298
  • [23] Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Adolescent Patients Limb Asymmetry and Functional Knee Bracing
    Dai, Boyi
    Butler, Robert J.
    Garrett, William E.
    Queen, Robin M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2012, 40 (12): : 2756 - 2763
  • [24] Functional bracing was no better than nonbracing after anterior cruciate ligament repair
    McDevitt, ER
    Taylor, DC
    Miller, MD
    Gerber, JP
    Ziemke, G
    Hinkin, D
    Uhorchak, JM
    Arciero, RA
    St Pierre, P
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (08): : 1890 - 1890
  • [25] A review of systematic reviews on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rehabilitation
    Lobb, Ryan
    Tumilty, Steve
    Claydon, Leica S.
    PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT, 2012, 13 (04) : 270 - 278
  • [26] Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Recovery and Rehabilitation A Systematic Review
    Glattke, Kaycee E.
    Tummala, Sailesh, V
    Chhabra, Anikar
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2022, 104 (08): : 739 - 754
  • [27] Postoperative Rehabilitation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Nelson, Christopher
    Rajan, Lavan
    Day, Jonathan
    Hinton, Richard
    Bodendorfer, Blake M.
    SPORTS MEDICINE AND ARTHROSCOPY REVIEW, 2021, 29 (02): : 63 - 80
  • [28] Outcome of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Wright, Rick W.
    Gill, Corey S.
    Chen, Ling
    Brophy, Robert H.
    Matava, Matthew J.
    Smith, Matthew V.
    Mall, Nathan A.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2012, 94A (06): : 531 - 536
  • [29] Functional Outcome and Graft Retention in Patients With Septic Arthritis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Makhni, Eric C.
    Steinhaus, Michael E.
    Mehran, Nima
    Schulz, Brian S.
    Ahmad, Christopher S.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2015, 31 (07): : 1392 - 1401
  • [30] The effect of proprioceptive knee bracing on knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Hanzlikova, I
    Richards, J.
    Hebert-Losier, K.
    Smekal, D.
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2019, 67 : 242 - 247