Compression of Digital Images in Radiology - Results of a Consensus Conference

被引:22
作者
Loose, R. [1 ]
Braunschweig, R.
Kotter, E. [2 ]
Mildenberger, P. [3 ]
Simmler, R. [4 ]
Wucherer, M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Klinikum Nurnberg Nord, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, D-90419 Nurnberg, Germany
[2] Univ Freiburg Klinikum, Rontgendiagnost Abt, Freiburg, Germany
[3] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Klin & Poliklin Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Mainz, Germany
[4] Klinikum Nurnberg, Inst Med Phys, Nurnberg, Germany
来源
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN | 2009年 / 181卷 / 01期
关键词
image compression; consensus conference; DICOM; JPEG; 2000; diagnostic image quality; WAVELET COMPRESSION; JPEG COMPRESSION; CT; RADIOGRAPHS; LESIONS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1055/s-2008-1027847
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Recommendations for lossy compression of digital radiological DICOM images in Germany by means of a consensus conference. The compression of digital radiological images was evaluated in many studies [1-5], Even though the results demonstrate full diagnostic image quality of modality-dependent compression between 1:5 and 1:200, there are only a few clinical applications. Materials and Methods: A consensus conference with approx. 80 interested participants (radiology, industry, physics, and agencies) without individual invitation was organized by the working groups AGIT and APT of the German Roentgen Society DRG to determine compression factors without loss of diagnostic image quality for different anatomical regions for CT, CR/DR, MR, RF/XA examinations. The consent level was specified as at least 66%. Results: For individual modalities the following compression factors were recommended: CT (brain) 1:5, CT (all other applications) 1:8, CR/DR (all applications except mammography) 1:10, CR/DR (mammography) 1:15, MR (all applications) 1:7, RF/XA (fluoroscopy, DSA, cardiac angio) 1: 6. The recommended compression ratios are valid for JPEG and JPEG 2000/Wavelet compressions. Conclusion: The results may be understood as recommendations and indicate limits of compression factors with no expected reduction of diagnostic image quality. They are similar to the current national recommendations for Canada and England [21, 27].
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 37
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [11] Effect of CT image compression on computer-assisted lung nodule volume measurement
    Ko, LP
    Chang, J
    Bomsztyk, E
    Babb, JS
    Naidich, DP
    Rusinek, H
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2005, 237 (01) : 83 - 88
  • [12] Koff DA, 2006, CAN ASSOC RADIOL J, V57, P211
  • [13] Kondo Yuji, 2002, Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi, V58, P1393
  • [14] Kopp Ina B, 2007, Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich, V101, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.zgesun.2007.01.002
  • [15] LOOSE R, 2007, ROFO FORTSCHR RONTG, V179, P220
  • [16] LOOSE R, 2008, EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, V18, P152
  • [17] LOOSE R, 1996, ROFO FORTSCHR RONTG, V164, P79
  • [18] Acute cerebral infarction: Effect of JPEG compression on detection at CT
    Ohgiya, Y
    Gokan, T
    Nobusawa, H
    Hirose, M
    Seino, N
    Fujisawa, H
    Baba, M
    Nagai, K
    Tanno, K
    Takeyama, N
    Munechika, H
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2003, 227 (01) : 124 - 127
  • [19] An evaluation of JPEG and JPEG 2000 irreversible compression algorithms applied to neurologic computed tomography and magnetic resonance images
    Savcenko, V
    Erickson, BJ
    Persons, KR
    Campeau, NG
    Huston, J
    Wood, CP
    Schreiner, SA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2000, 13 (02) : 183 - 185
  • [20] Clinical evaluation of compression ratios using JPEG2000 on computed radiography chest images
    Sung, MM
    Kim, HJ
    Yoo, SK
    Choi, BW
    Nam, JE
    Kim, HS
    Lee, JH
    Yoo, HS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2002, 15 (02) : 78 - 83