Spatial capture-recapture for categorically marked populations with an application to genetic capture-recapture

被引:41
|
作者
Augustine, Ben C. [1 ,2 ]
Royle, J. Andrew [3 ]
Murphy, Sean M. [4 ]
Chandler, Richard B. [5 ]
Cox, John J. [4 ]
Kelly, Marcella J. [6 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Atkinson Ctr Sustainable Future, New York, NY 14843 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Dept Nat Resources, New York, NY 14843 USA
[3] US Geol Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Res Ctr, Laurel, MD 20708 USA
[4] Univ Kentucky, Dept Forestry, Lexington, KY 40546 USA
[5] Univ Georgia, Dept Forestry & Nat Resources, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[6] Virginia Tech, Dept Fish & Wildlife Conservat, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
来源
ECOSPHERE | 2019年 / 10卷 / 04期
关键词
genetic mark-recapture; Identity Diversity Index; microsatellites; partial identity; spatial capture-recapture; spatial mark-resight; unmarked spatial capture-recapture; DENSITY-ESTIMATION; MODELS; MICROSATELLITES; IDENTIFICATION; IDENTITY; BEAR; SEX;
D O I
10.1002/ecs2.2627
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Recently introduced unmarked spatial capture-recapture (SCR), spatial mark-resight (SMR), and 2-flank spatial partial identity models (SPIMs) extend the domain of SCR to populations or observation systems that do not always allow for individual identity to be determined with certainty. For example, some species do not have natural marks that can reliably produce individual identities from photographs, and some methods of observation produce partial identity samples as is the case with remote cameras that sometimes produce single-flank photographs. Unmarked SCR, SMR, and SPIM share the feature that they probabilistically resolve the uncertainty in individual identity using the spatial location where samples were collected. Spatial location is informative of individual identity in spatially structured populations because a sample is more likely to have been produced by an individual living near the trap where it was recorded than an individual living further away from the trap. Further, the level of information about individual identity that a spatial location contains is related to two key ecological concepts, population density and home range size, which we quantify using a proposed Identity Diversity Index (IDI). We show that latent and partial identity SCR models produce imprecise and biased density estimates in many high IDI scenarios when data are sparse. We then extend the unmarked SCR model to incorporate categorical, partially identifying covariates, which reduce the level of uncertainty in individual identity, increasing the reliability and precision of density estimates, and allowing reliable density estimation in scenarios with higher IDI values and with more sparse data. We illustrate the performance of this "categorical SPIM" via simulations and by applying it to a black bear data set using microsatellite loci as categorical covariates, where we reproduce the full data set estimates with only slightly less precision using fewer loci than necessary for confident individual identification. We then discuss how the categorical SPIM can be applied to other wildlife sampling scenarios such as remote camera surveys, where natural or researcher-applied partial marks can be observed in photographs. Finally, we discuss how the categorical SPIM can be added to SMR, 2-flank SPIM, or other latent identity SCR models.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SPATIAL CAPTURE-RECAPTURE WITH PARTIAL IDENTITY: AN APPLICATION TO CAMERA TRAPS
    Augustine, Ben C.
    Royle, J. Andrew
    Kelly, Marcella J.
    Satter, Christopher B.
    Alonso, Robert S.
    Boydston, Erin E.
    Crooks, Kevin R.
    ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2018, 12 (01) : 67 - 95
  • [2] Forecasting wildlife movement with spatial capture-recapture
    Crum, Nathan J.
    Gowan, Timothy A.
    Ramachandran, Kandethody M.
    METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 14 (11): : 2844 - 2855
  • [3] From distance sampling to spatial capture-recapture
    Borchers, David L.
    Marques, Tiago A.
    ASTA-ADVANCES IN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 101 (04) : 475 - 494
  • [4] Integrating resource selection information with spatial capture-recapture
    Royle, J. Andrew
    Chandler, Richard B.
    Sun, Catherine C.
    Fuller, Angela K.
    METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2013, 4 (06): : 520 - 530
  • [5] Spatial capture-recapture with random thinning for unidentified encounters
    Jimenez, Jose
    Augustine, Ben C.
    Linden, Daniel W.
    Chandler, Richard B.
    Royle, J. Andrew
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 11 (03): : 1187 - 1198
  • [6] The importance of independence in unmarked spatial capture-recapture analysis
    Sun, Catherine
    Burton, A. Cole
    WILDLIFE BIOLOGY, 2024, 2024 (03)
  • [7] Optimal sampling design for spatial capture-recapture
    Dupont, Gates
    Royle, J. Andrew
    Nawaz, Muhammad Ali
    Sutherland, Chris
    ECOLOGY, 2021, 102 (03)
  • [8] A Capture-Recapture Approach to Estimation of Refugee Populations
    Gold, Steven J.
    Wibert, Wilma Novales
    Bondartsova, Vera
    Biroscak, Brian J.
    Post, Lori A.
    INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION, 2015, 53 (05) : 3 - 25
  • [9] A spatial capture-recapture model with attractions between individuals
    McLaughlin, Paul
    Bar, Haim
    ENVIRONMETRICS, 2021, 32 (01)
  • [10] A hierarchical model for spatial capture-recapture data
    Royle, J. Andrew
    Young, Kevin V.
    ECOLOGY, 2008, 89 (08) : 2281 - 2289