Sustainability assessment of groundwater remediation technologies based on multi-criteria decision making method

被引:57
作者
An, Da [1 ,2 ]
Xi, Beidou [1 ,2 ]
Ren, Jingzheng [3 ]
Wang, Yue [1 ,2 ]
Jia, Xiaoping [4 ]
He, Chang [5 ]
Li, Zhiwei [4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, State Key Lab Environm Criteria & Risk Assessment, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, State Environm Protect Key Lab Simulat & Control, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Technol & Innovat, Ctr Engn Operat Management, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
[4] Qingdao Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Environm & Safety Engn, Qingdao 266042, Peoples R China
[5] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Chem & Chem Engn, 135 Xingang West Rd, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Sustainability assessment; Multi-criteria decision making; ELECTRE; Analytic hierarchy process; Groundwater remediation technology; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; STRATEGIC MEASURES; ENERGY SECURITY; SUPPORT-SYSTEM; SELECTION; HYDROGEN; CHINA; TOPSIS; PRIORITIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.08.002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainability assessment of the technologies for groundwater remediation is of vital importance for helping the decision-makers to select the most sustainable technology among multiple alternatives. This paper aims at developing an innovative methodology for sustainability assessment of the technologies for groundwater remediation. A total of eight criteria have been used for sustainability assessment of the technologies for groundwater remediation in this study, and they are capital cost, detection and analysis costs, and operation and maintenance costs in economic aspects, effect of secondary pollution environmental aspect, effectiveness for water quality improvement and time for remediation in technological aspect, the effect on public health in social aspect, and policy support belonging to political aspect. The relative priorities of the alternative technologies with respect to each criterion were scored by Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and it was also employed to calculate the weights of the criteria. After determining the decision-making matrix,ELECTRE was employed to rank the alternatives according to their sustainability performances. An illustrative case has been studied by the proposed method, monitored natural attenuation (MNA) has been recognized as the most sustainable technology for groundwater remediation, followed by pump-treat (1382T) technology, permeable reactive barriers (PRB) and air sparing (AS). Finally, Sensitivity analysis was also carried out to test the robustness of the results. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 46
页数:11
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Energy system assessment with sustainability indicators [J].
Afgan, NH ;
Carvalho, MG ;
Hovanov, NV .
ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (09) :603-612
[2]  
Almeida A.T., 2000, COMPUT OPER RES, V34, P3569
[3]   A sustainability assessment methodology for prioritizing the technologies of groundwater contamination remediation [J].
An, Da ;
Xi, Beidou ;
Wang, Yue ;
Xu, Di ;
Tang, Jun ;
Dong, Lichun ;
Ren, Jingzheng ;
Pang, Chengfang .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 :4647-4656
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE
[5]  
Banar M., 2015, P WORLD C NEW TECHNO, V151, P1
[6]   Development and applications of groundwater remediation technologies in the USA [J].
Barcelona, MJ .
HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL, 2005, 13 (01) :288-294
[7]   Performance of air sparging systems: a review of case studies [J].
Bass, DH ;
Hastings, NA ;
Brown, RA .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2000, 72 (2-3) :101-119
[8]   The analytic hierarchy process applied to maintenance strategy selection [J].
Bevilacqua, M ;
Braglia, M .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2000, 70 (01) :71-83
[9]   One solution for cross-country transport-sustainability evaluation using a modified ELECTRE method [J].
Bojkovic, Natasa ;
Anic, Ivan ;
Pejcic-Tarle, Snezana .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (05) :1176-1186