Quantification of Estrogen Receptor-Alpha Expression in Human Breast Carcinomas With a Miniaturized, Low-Cost Digital Microscope: A Comparison with a High-End Whole Slide-Scanner

被引:7
作者
Holmstrom, Oscar [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Linder, Nina [1 ,6 ]
Lundin, Mikael [1 ]
Moilanen, Hannu [2 ]
Suutala, Antti [1 ]
Turkki, Riku [1 ]
Joensuu, Heikki [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Isola, Jorma [3 ]
Diwan, Vinod [6 ]
Lundin, Johan [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Inst Mol Med Finland, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Oulu, Ctr Microscopy & Nanotechnol, Oulu, Finland
[3] Univ Tampere, BioMediTech, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland
[4] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Helsinki, Finland
[5] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
[6] Karolinska Inst, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Stockholm, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会; 芬兰科学院;
关键词
AUTOMATED IMAGE-ANALYSIS; CANCER; ER; SENSITIVITY; POPULATION; DIAGNOSIS; PR;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0144688
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Introduction A significant barrier to medical diagnostics in low-resource environments is the lack of medical care and equipment. Here we present a low-cost, cloud-connected digital microscope for applications at the point-of-care. We evaluate the performance of the device in the digital assessment of estrogen receptor-alpha (ER) expression in breast cancer samples. Studies suggest computer-assisted analysis of tumor samples digitized with whole slide-scanners may be comparable to manual scoring, here we study whether similar results can be obtained with the device presented. Materials and Methods A total of 170 samples of human breast carcinoma, immunostained for ER expression, were digitized with a high-end slide-scanner and the point-of-care microscope. Corresponding regions from the samples were extracted, and ER status was determined visually and digitally. Samples were classified as ER negative (< 1% ER positivity) or positive, and further into weakly (1-10% positivity) and strongly positive. Interobserver agreement (Cohen's kappa) was measured and correlation coefficients (Pearson's product-momentum) were calculated for comparison of the methods. Results Correlation and interobserver agreement (r = 0.98, p < 0.001, kappa = 0.84, CI95% = 0.75-0.94) were strong in the results from both devices. Concordance of the point-of-care microscope and the manual scoring was good (r = 0.94, p < 0.001, kappa = 0.71, CI95% = 0.61-0.80), and comparable to the concordance between the slide scanner and manual scoring (r = 0.93, p < 0.001, kappa = 0.69, CI95% = 0.60-0.78). Fourteen (8%) discrepant cases between manual and device-based scoring were present with the slide scanner, and 16 (9%) with the point-of-care microscope, all representing samples of low ER expression. Conclusions Tumor ER status can be accurately quantified with a low-cost imaging device and digital image-analysis, with results comparable to conventional computer-assisted or manual scoring. This technology could potentially be expanded for other histopathological applications at the point-of-care.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Allred DC, 1998, MODERN PATHOL, V11, P155
[2]  
[Anonymous], DIAGNOSTIC PATHOL S1
[3]   Assessment of Automated Image Analysis of Breast Cancer Tissue Microarrays for Epidemiologic Studies [J].
Bolton, Kelly L. ;
Garcia-Closas, Montserrat ;
Pfeiffer, Ruth M. ;
Duggan, Maire A. ;
Howat, William J. ;
Hewitt, Stephen M. ;
Yang, Xiaohong R. ;
Cornelison, Robert ;
Anzick, Sarah L. ;
Meltzer, Paul ;
Davis, Sean ;
Lenz, Petra ;
Figueroa, Jonine D. ;
Pharoah, Paul D. P. ;
Sherman, Mark E. .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2010, 19 (04) :992-999
[4]   Predicting the future burden of cancer [J].
Bray, F ;
Moller, B .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2006, 6 (01) :63-74
[5]   Bimodal frequency distribution of estrogen receptor immunohistochemical staining results in breast cancer [J].
Collins, LC ;
Botero, ML ;
Schnitt, SJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 123 (01) :16-20
[6]  
Diaz Leslie K, 2004, Ann Diagn Pathol, V8, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2003.11.004
[7]   Automated image analysis for high-throughput quantitative detection of ER and PR expression levels in large-scale clinical studies: The TEAM Trial Experience [J].
Faratian, Dana ;
Kay, Charlene ;
Robson, Tammy ;
Campbell, Fiona M. ;
Grant, Margaret ;
Rea, Dan ;
Bartlett, John M. S. .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2009, 55 (05) :587-593
[8]  
Fitzgibbons PL, 2000, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V124, P966
[9]  
HAHNEL R, 1979, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V44, P671, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197908)44:2<671::AID-CNCR2820440238>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-V