Should BIPV technologies be empowered by innovation policy mix to facilitate energy transitions? - Revealing stakeholders' different perspectives using Q methodology

被引:45
作者
Chang, Ruidong [1 ]
Cao, Yuan [2 ]
Lu, Yujie [3 ]
Shabunko, Veronika [4 ]
机构
[1] Bond Univ, Fac Soc & Design, Ctr Comparat Construct Res, 14 Univ Dr, Robina, Qld 4226, Australia
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Civil Engn, 35 St George St, Toronto, ON M5S 1A4, Canada
[3] Tongji Univ, Dept Bldg Engn, Coll Civil Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[4] Solar Energy Res Inst Singapore, 7 Engn Dr 1,06-01 Block E3A, Singapore 117574, Singapore
关键词
Renewable energy; Solar power; Sustainability transition; Energy transition; Energy policy; Innovation policy; BUILDING-INTEGRATED PHOTOVOLTAICS; MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE; CREATIVE DESTRUCTION; SUSTAINABILITY; SYSTEMS; CONSTRUCTION; MANAGEMENT; DYNAMICS; BARRIERS; INSIGHTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.047
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
As new renewable energy applications, building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) systems have significant potential to facilitate energy transitions towards renewable energy in highly urbanized countries, where large areas of land for developing large-scale solar or wind farms are limited. Government policy plays a significant role in nurturing and protecting energy innovations at the early development stage, such as BIPV. However, various actors could have divergent views on the policies for energy innovations, and policymakers need to consider these views in policymaking to avoid potential failures in policy implementation. By taking BIPV as an example, this study aims to reveal stakeholders' different perspectives on the required innovation policies for new energy technologies based on Q methodology. The results indicate even though stakeholders share similar views on some aspects of BIPV policies, four significantly distinct policy perspectives on BIPV exist in stakeholders' mindsets, including supervisory support, intensively investigate, cautiously stimulate and proactively promote. These policy perspectives require significantly different approaches to promote BIPV, which indicates the complexity in formulating one set of policy mix catering for the various mindsets of stakeholders. This study has both theoretical contributions to innovation policy mix for energy transitions, and policy implications for promoting energy innovations, especially BIPV worldwide.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 318
页数:12
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   Q-methodology in nursing research - A promising method for the study of subjectivity [J].
Akhtar-Danesh, Noori ;
Baumann, Andrea ;
Cordingley, Lis .
WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2008, 30 (06) :759-773
[2]   Transition policy and innovation policy: Friends or foes? [J].
Alkemade, Floortje ;
Hekkert, Marko P. ;
Negro, Simona O. .
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2011, 1 (01) :125-129
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, TRANSTITIONS SUSTAIN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, CHANGING I LANDSCAPE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ARCHIT SCI REV, DOI DOI 10.3763/ASRE.2007.5017
[6]   Performance monitoring results of the first grid-connected BIPV system in Colombia [J].
Aristizabal, A. J. ;
Gordillo, G. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2008, 33 (11) :2475-2484
[7]   A general approach toward building integrated photovoltaic systems and its implementation barriers: A review [J].
Azadian, Farshad ;
Radzi, M. A. M. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 22 :527-538
[8]   Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology [J].
Barry, J ;
Proops, J .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 28 (03) :337-345
[9]   The choice of innovation policy instruments [J].
Borras, Susana ;
Edquist, Charles .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2013, 80 (08) :1513-1522
[10]  
Brown S, 2015, QUAL QUANTITY, V49