Efficacy of Low-molecular-weight-heparin versus Vitamin K antagonists for long term treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in adults: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

被引:64
|
作者
Louzada, Martha L. [1 ]
Majeed, Habeeb [1 ]
Wells, Philip S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Ottawa Hlth Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
Cancer; Venous thromboembolism; Low molecular weight heparin; Oral anticoagulants; DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS; ORAL ANTICOAGULANT-THERAPY; SECONDARY PREVENTION; PULMONARY-EMBOLISM; CLINICAL-COURSE; WARFARIN; ACENOCOUMAROL; METAANALYSIS; PROPHYLAXIS; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.thromres.2008.09.002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Patients with malignancy have a 4-fold increase in the risk of developing a venous thrombosis and a 3-fold increase in risk of bleeding. Both low-molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH) and vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have been used for treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis. However, the best anticoagulation approach remains a matter of debate. Objective: In adult patients with cancer and an acute venous thromboembolic event we sought to determine the rates of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major hemorrhage when treated with prolonged LMWH therapy compared to vitamin-K antagonists. Patients/Methods: A systematic literature search strategy was used to identify potential trials on MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials and Medline in-process using an OVID interface. Risk assessment of bias of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed according to the Cochrane Collaboration-Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The primary outcome measure was symptomatic VTE recurrence rate during the anticoagulation period. Relative risk (RR) was used as the primary measurement with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Pooled measurements were calculated using random-effects and fixed-effects model. Results: Five articles met our inclusion criteria. All compared LMWH and VKA for secondary prevention of VTE. The pooled RR of VTE recurrence was 0.53 (95% Cl: 0.36-0.76; p = 0.007). The pooled RR of major bleeding was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.49-1.93, p = 0.95). Minor bleeding events and all cause mortality were similar between the 2 intervention arms. Conclusions: The results of our review suggest that the long term use of LMWH after the acute first week of treatment is superior to VKAs for secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism in adult patients with cancer. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:837 / 844
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Factor Xa inhibitors versus low molecular weight heparin for the treatment of cancer associated venous thromboembolism; A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies
    Hussain, Maryam R.
    Ali, Faisal S.
    Verghese, Dhiran
    Myint, Phyo Thazin
    Ahmed, Mubashir
    Gong, Zimu
    Gerais, Yasmin
    Siddiqui, Mahrukh
    Lin, Jenny J.
    Troy, Kevin
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2022, 169
  • [22] Evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants and low molecular weight heparin in gastrointestinal cancer-associated venous thromboembolism
    Recio-Boiles, Alejandro
    Veeravelli, Sumana
    Vondrak, Jessica
    Babiker, Hani M.
    Scott, Aaron J.
    Shroff, Rachna T.
    Patel, Hitendra
    Elquza, Emad
    McBride, Ali
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 11 (10) : 866 - 876
  • [23] A review of the practical advantages of low molecular weight heparin in the treatment of cancer-related venous thromboembolism
    Rhodes, Sue
    Bond, Sarah
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2008, 12 (05) : 425 - 429
  • [24] Comparative Efficacy of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in Cancer-Associated Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Patel, Tirath
    Nadeem, Taha
    Shahbaz, Usman
    Tanveer, Fatima
    Ahsan, Muneeb
    Saeed, Usman
    Ahmed, Abdullah
    Kumar, Vinesh
    Jaffari, Syed M. Ibne Ali
    Zaman, Mohammad U.
    Kumar, Satesh
    Khatri, Mahima
    Varrassi, Giustino
    Vanga, Prasanthi
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (06)
  • [25] Efficacy and Safety of Apixaban versus Dalteparin as a Treatment for Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Arce-Huamani, Miguel A.
    Barboza, Joshuan J.
    Martinez-Herrera, Jose Fabian
    Torres-Roman, J. Smith
    Maguina, Jorge L.
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2023, 59 (10):
  • [26] Treatment of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism with Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin or Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Patient Selection, Controversies, and Caveats
    O'Connell, Casey
    Escalante, Carmen P.
    Goldhaber, Samuel Z.
    McBane, Robert
    Connors, Jean M.
    Raskob, Gary E.
    ONCOLOGIST, 2021, 26 (01) : E8 - E16
  • [27] Direct oral anticoagulant versus low-molecular-weight heparin for treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Haykal, Tarek
    Zayed, Yazan
    Deliwala, Smit
    Kerbage, Josiane
    Ponnapalli, Anoosha
    Malladi, Srikanth
    Goranta, Sowmya
    Samji, Varun
    Adam, Soheir
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2020, 194 : 57 - 65
  • [28] A systematic review of economic analyses of low-molecular-weight heparin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism
    Sprague, S
    Cook, DJ
    Anderson, D
    O'Brien, BJ
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2003, 112 (04) : 193 - 201
  • [29] Direct oral anticoagulants compared to low-molecular-weight heparin for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis: Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Moik, Florian
    Posch, Florian
    Zielinski, Christoph
    Pabinger, Ingrid
    Ay, Cihan
    RESEARCH AND PRACTICE IN THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2020, 4 (04) : 550 - 561
  • [30] Rivaroxaban versus dalteparin for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shrestha, Bibek
    Bhusal, Suzit
    Kandel, Grishma
    Bastakoti, Sudip
    Yadav, Krishna Kumar
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2025, 87 (03): : 1617 - 1627