共 50 条
Evaluation of the RealTime HIV-1, Xpert HIV-1, and Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx Assays in Comparison to the NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1 v2.0 Assay for Quantification of HIV-1 Viral Load
被引:46
|作者:
Mor, Orna
[1
]
Gozlan, Yael
[1
]
Wax, Marina
[1
]
Mileguir, Fernando
[1
]
Rakovsky, Avia
[1
]
Noy, Bina
[2
]
Mendelson, Ella
[1
,3
]
Levy, Itzchak
[4
]
机构:
[1] Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Minist Hlth, Cent Virol Lab, Natl HIV Reference Lab, Ramat Gan, Israel
[2] Ilex Med, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[3] Tel Aviv Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[4] Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Infect Dis Unit, Ramat Gan, Israel
关键词:
TAQMAN HIV-1;
VERSION;
2.0;
SUBTYPE DISTRIBUTION;
PERFORMANCE;
RESISTANCE;
SAMPLES;
CHINA;
D O I:
10.1128/JCM.01806-15
中图分类号:
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号:
071005 ;
100705 ;
摘要:
HIV-1 RNA monitoring, both before and during antiretroviral therapy, is an integral part of HIV management worldwide. Measurements of HIV-1 viral loads are expected to assess the copy numbers of all common HIV-1 subtypes accurately and to be equally sensitive at different viral loads. In this study, we compared for the first time the performance of the NucliSens v2.0, RealTime HIV-1, Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx, and Xpert HIV-1 viral load assays. Plasma samples (n = 404) were selected on the basis of their NucliSens v2.0 viral load results and HIV-1 subtypes. Concordance, linear regression, and Bland-Altman plots were assessed, and mixed-model analysis was utilized to compare the analytical performance of the assays for different HIV-1 subtypes and for low and high HIV-1 copy numbers. Overall, high concordance (>83.89%), high correlation values (Pearson r values of >0.89), and good agreement were observed among all assays, although the Xpert and Aptima assays, which provided the most similar outputs (estimated mean viral loads of 2.67 log copies/ml [95% confidence interval [CI], 2.50 to 2.84 log copies/ml] and 2.68 log copies/ml [95% CI, 2.49 to 2.86 log copies/ml], respectively), correlated best with the RealTime assay (89.8% concordance, with Pearson r values of 0.97 to 0.98). These three assays exhibited greater precision than the NucliSens v2.0 assay. All assays were equally sensitive for subtype B and AG/G samples and for samples with viral loads of 1.60 to 3.00 log copies/ml. The NucliSens v2.0 assay underestimated A1 samples and those with viral loads of >3.00 log copies/ml. The RealTime assay tended to underquantify subtype C (compared to the Xpert and Aptima assays) and subtype A1 samples. The Xpert and Aptima assays were equally efficient for detection of all subtypes and viral loads, which renders these new assays most suitable for clinical HIV laboratories.
引用
收藏
页码:3458 / 3465
页数:8
相关论文