Evaluation of the RealTime HIV-1, Xpert HIV-1, and Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx Assays in Comparison to the NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1 v2.0 Assay for Quantification of HIV-1 Viral Load

被引:46
|
作者
Mor, Orna [1 ]
Gozlan, Yael [1 ]
Wax, Marina [1 ]
Mileguir, Fernando [1 ]
Rakovsky, Avia [1 ]
Noy, Bina [2 ]
Mendelson, Ella [1 ,3 ]
Levy, Itzchak [4 ]
机构
[1] Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Minist Hlth, Cent Virol Lab, Natl HIV Reference Lab, Ramat Gan, Israel
[2] Ilex Med, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[3] Tel Aviv Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[4] Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Infect Dis Unit, Ramat Gan, Israel
关键词
TAQMAN HIV-1; VERSION; 2.0; SUBTYPE DISTRIBUTION; PERFORMANCE; RESISTANCE; SAMPLES; CHINA;
D O I
10.1128/JCM.01806-15
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
HIV-1 RNA monitoring, both before and during antiretroviral therapy, is an integral part of HIV management worldwide. Measurements of HIV-1 viral loads are expected to assess the copy numbers of all common HIV-1 subtypes accurately and to be equally sensitive at different viral loads. In this study, we compared for the first time the performance of the NucliSens v2.0, RealTime HIV-1, Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx, and Xpert HIV-1 viral load assays. Plasma samples (n = 404) were selected on the basis of their NucliSens v2.0 viral load results and HIV-1 subtypes. Concordance, linear regression, and Bland-Altman plots were assessed, and mixed-model analysis was utilized to compare the analytical performance of the assays for different HIV-1 subtypes and for low and high HIV-1 copy numbers. Overall, high concordance (>83.89%), high correlation values (Pearson r values of >0.89), and good agreement were observed among all assays, although the Xpert and Aptima assays, which provided the most similar outputs (estimated mean viral loads of 2.67 log copies/ml [95% confidence interval [CI], 2.50 to 2.84 log copies/ml] and 2.68 log copies/ml [95% CI, 2.49 to 2.86 log copies/ml], respectively), correlated best with the RealTime assay (89.8% concordance, with Pearson r values of 0.97 to 0.98). These three assays exhibited greater precision than the NucliSens v2.0 assay. All assays were equally sensitive for subtype B and AG/G samples and for samples with viral loads of 1.60 to 3.00 log copies/ml. The NucliSens v2.0 assay underestimated A1 samples and those with viral loads of >3.00 log copies/ml. The RealTime assay tended to underquantify subtype C (compared to the Xpert and Aptima assays) and subtype A1 samples. The Xpert and Aptima assays were equally efficient for detection of all subtypes and viral loads, which renders these new assays most suitable for clinical HIV laboratories.
引用
收藏
页码:3458 / 3465
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the bioMerieux NucliSENS EasyQ HIV-1 v2.0-HIV-1 RNA quantification assay versus Abbott RealTime HIV-1 and Roche Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 v2.0 on current epidemic HIV-1 variants
    Mourez, Thomas
    Delaugerre, Constance
    Vray, Muriel
    Lemee, Veronique
    Simon, Francois
    Plantier, Jean-Christophe
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2015, 71 : 76 - 81
  • [2] HIV-1 RNA quantification in plasma specimens using nuclisens easyQ HIV-1 V2.0
    Oosterlaken, T.
    van Deursen, P.
    Jurriaans, S.
    Ligeon, V.
    Bertens, L.
    de Jong, J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2009, 46 : S27 - S27
  • [3] Evaluation of the Aptima® HIV-1 Quant Dx Assay for HIV-1 RNA Viral Load Detection and Quantitation in Plasma of HIV-1-Infected Individuals: A Comparison With Abbott RealTime HIV-1 Assay
    Amendola, Alessandra
    Pisciotta, Maria
    Aleo, Loredana
    Ferraioli, Valeria
    Angeletti, Claudio
    Capobianchi, Maria Rosaria
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2016, 88 (09) : 1535 - 1544
  • [4] Comparison of the Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx assay with the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 v2.0 Test for HIV-1 viral load quantification in plasma samples from HIV-1-infected patients
    Longo, Serena
    Bon, Isabella
    Musumeci, Giuseppina
    Bertoldi, Alessia
    D'Urbano, Vanessa
    Calza, Leonardo
    Re, Maria Carla
    HEALTH SCIENCE REPORTS, 2018, 1 (04)
  • [5] Evaluation of the Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx assay on a wide panel of HIV-1 strains
    Gueudin, Marie
    Baron, Adeline
    Alessandri-Gradt, Elodie
    Lemee, Veronique
    Mourez, Thomas
    Dina, Julia
    Plantier, Jean-Christophe
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2016, 82 : S38 - S38
  • [6] Evaluation of the NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1 v1.1 and RealTime HIV-1 kits for quantitation of HIV-1 RNA in plasma
    Choi, Ju-yeon
    Kim, Eun-Jin
    Rho, Hyun Joo
    Kim, Jin Young
    Kwon, Oh-Kyung
    Lee, Jin-Hee
    Koo, Min Jee
    Kim, Sung Soon
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2009, 161 (01) : 7 - 11
  • [7] Comparison of the NucliSENS EasyQ HIV-1 v2.0 with Abbott m2000rt RealTime HIV-1 assay for plasma RNA quantitation in different HIV-1 subtypes
    Gomes, Perpetua
    Carvalho, Ana Patricia
    Diogo, Isabel
    Goncalves, Fatima
    Costa, Ines
    Cabanas, Joaquim
    Camacho, Ricardo Jorge
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2013, 193 (01) : 18 - 22
  • [8] COMPARISON OF THE APTIMA HIV-1 QUANT ASSAY TO THE COBAS AMPLIPREP/COBAS TAQMAN HIV-1 TEST, V2.0
    Hatzakis, A.
    Papachristou, H.
    Kantzanou, M.
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2013, 89 : A353 - A353
  • [9] Comparison of the Hologic Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx Assay to the Roche COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 Test v2.0 for the quantification of HIV-1 RNA in plasma samples
    Schonning, Kristian
    Johansen, Kim
    Landt, Bodil
    Benfield, Thomas
    Westh, Henrik
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2017, 92 : 14 - 19
  • [10] HIV-1 viral load quantification using Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx assay in Kenya: a diagnostic accuracy study
    Kangogo, G.
    Atsyaya, J.
    Ombwayo, M.
    Kirui, E.
    Kipkerich, S.
    Bowen, N.
    Umuro, M.
    HIV MEDICINE, 2019, 20 : 280 - 280