A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modeling using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis and Machine Learning Methods

被引:446
作者
Khosravi, Khabat [1 ]
Shahabi, Himan [2 ]
Binh Thai Pham [3 ]
Adamowski, Jan [4 ]
Shirzadi, Ataollah [5 ]
Pradhan, Biswajeet [6 ,7 ]
Dou, Jie [8 ]
Ly, Hai-Bang [9 ]
Grof, Gyula [10 ]
Huu Loc Ho [11 ]
Hong, Haoyuan [12 ]
Chapi, Kamran [5 ]
Prakash, Indra [13 ]
机构
[1] Sari Agr Sci & Nat Resources Univ, Dept Watershed Management Engn, Sari, Iran
[2] Univ Kurdistan, Fac Nat Resources, Dept Geomorphol, Sanandaj, Iran
[3] Duy Tan Univ, Inst Res & Dev, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Bioresource Engn, Ste Anne De Bellevue, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Kurdistan, Dept Rangeland & Watershed Management, Fac Nat Res, Sanandaj, Iran
[6] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Engn & IT, CAMGIS, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[7] Sejong Univ, Dept Energy & Mineral Resources Engn, 209 NeungdongroGwangjin Gu, Seoul 05006, South Korea
[8] PWRI, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
[9] Univ Transport Technol, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
[10] Budapest Univ Technol & Econ, Dept Energy Engn, Budapest, Hungary
[11] Nguyen Tat Thanh Univ, NTT Hitech Inst, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[12] Nanjing Normal Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Virtual Geog Environm, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[13] Govt Gujarat, Dept Sci & Technol, BISAG, Gandhinagar, India
关键词
Flood susceptibility; Machine Learning; Multi-Criteria Decision-Making; GIS; China; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE APPROACH; DATA MINING TECHNIQUES; WEIGHTS-OF-EVIDENCE; NAIVE BAYES TREE; FREQUENCY RATIO; RIVER-BASIN; ENSEMBLE; FOREST; COUNTY; VIKOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.073
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Floods around the world are having devastating effects on human life and property. In this paper, three Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) analysis techniques (VIKOR, TOPSIS and SAW), along with two machine learning methods (NBT and NB), were tested for their ability to model flood susceptibility in one of China's most flood-prone areas, the Ningdu Catchment. Twelve flood conditioning factors were used as input parameters: Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), lithology, land use, distance from river, curvature, altitude, Stream Transport Index (STI), Topographic Wetness Index (TWI), Stream Power Index (SPI), soil type, slope and rainfall. The predictive capacity of the models was evaluated and validated using the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC). While all models showed a strong flood prediction capability (AUC > 0.95), the NBT model performed best (AUC = 0.98), suggesting that, among the models studied, the NBT model is a promising tool for the assessment of flood-prone areas and can allow for proper planning and management of flood hazards.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 323
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Numerical Comparison of Multi-criteria Decision-making Techniques: A Simulation on Flood Management Multi-criteria Systems
    Sabzi, Hamed Zamani
    King, James Phillip
    World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2015: Floods, Droughts, and Ecosystems, 2015, : 359 - 373
  • [42] A comparison among fuzzy multi-criteria decision making, bivariate, multivariate and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping
    Quoc Bao Pham
    Achour, Yacine
    Ali, Sk Ajim
    Parvin, Farhana
    Vojtek, Matej
    Vojtekova, Jana
    Al-Ansari, Nadhir
    Achu, A. L.
    Costache, Romulus
    Khedher, Khaled Mohamed
    Duong Tran Anh
    GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2021, 12 (01) : 1741 - 1777
  • [43] Comparative Analysis of Five Widely-Used Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods to Evaluate Clean Energy Technologies: A Case Study
    Effatpanah, Saeed Khojaste
    Ahmadi, Mohammad Hossein
    Aungkulanon, Pasura
    Maleki, Akbar
    Sadeghzadeh, Milad
    Sharifpur, Mohsen
    Chen, Lingen
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [44] Designing a post-disaster humanitarian supply chain using machine learning and multi-criteria decision-making techniques
    Shakibaei, Hossein
    Farhadi-Ramin, Mohammad Reza
    Alipour-Vaezi, Mohammad
    Aghsami, Amir
    Rabbani, Masoud
    KYBERNETES, 2024, 53 (05) : 1682 - 1709
  • [45] A Comparison of the Multi-criteria Decision-Making Methods for the Selection of Researchers
    Kaya, Gulsum Kubra
    Ozturk, Fatih
    INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING IN THE INTERNET-OF-THINGS WORLD, GJCIE 2020, 2022, : 147 - 159
  • [46] A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for infrastructure management
    Kabir, Golam
    Sadiq, Rehan
    Tesfamariam, Solomon
    STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2014, 10 (09) : 1176 - 1210
  • [47] Optimal Selection of Stock Portfolios Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Jing, Dongmei
    Imeni, Mohsen
    Edalatpanah, Seyyed Ahmad
    Alburaikan, Alhanouf
    Khalifa, Hamiden Abd El-Wahed
    MATHEMATICS, 2023, 11 (02)
  • [48] APPLICATION OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS IN DESTINATION BENCHMARKING
    Lusticky, Martin
    Vachova, Lucie
    Kaderabkova, Jaroslava
    15TH INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON REGIONAL SCIENCES, 2012, : 379 - 387
  • [49] Wastewater Treatment and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods: A Review
    Sharma, Tina
    Kumar, Anuj
    Pant, Sangeeta
    Kotecha, Ketan
    IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 143704 - 143720
  • [50] Geospatial Modeling Based-Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Flash Flood Susceptibility Zonation in an Arid Area
    Shawky, Mohamed
    Hassan, Quazi K. K.
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (10)