共 50 条
A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modeling using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis and Machine Learning Methods
被引:446
作者:
Khosravi, Khabat
[1
]
Shahabi, Himan
[2
]
Binh Thai Pham
[3
]
Adamowski, Jan
[4
]
Shirzadi, Ataollah
[5
]
Pradhan, Biswajeet
[6
,7
]
Dou, Jie
[8
]
Ly, Hai-Bang
[9
]
Grof, Gyula
[10
]
Huu Loc Ho
[11
]
Hong, Haoyuan
[12
]
Chapi, Kamran
[5
]
Prakash, Indra
[13
]
机构:
[1] Sari Agr Sci & Nat Resources Univ, Dept Watershed Management Engn, Sari, Iran
[2] Univ Kurdistan, Fac Nat Resources, Dept Geomorphol, Sanandaj, Iran
[3] Duy Tan Univ, Inst Res & Dev, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Bioresource Engn, Ste Anne De Bellevue, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Kurdistan, Dept Rangeland & Watershed Management, Fac Nat Res, Sanandaj, Iran
[6] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Engn & IT, CAMGIS, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[7] Sejong Univ, Dept Energy & Mineral Resources Engn, 209 NeungdongroGwangjin Gu, Seoul 05006, South Korea
[8] PWRI, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
[9] Univ Transport Technol, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
[10] Budapest Univ Technol & Econ, Dept Energy Engn, Budapest, Hungary
[11] Nguyen Tat Thanh Univ, NTT Hitech Inst, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[12] Nanjing Normal Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Virtual Geog Environm, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[13] Govt Gujarat, Dept Sci & Technol, BISAG, Gandhinagar, India
关键词:
Flood susceptibility;
Machine Learning;
Multi-Criteria Decision-Making;
GIS;
China;
ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE APPROACH;
DATA MINING TECHNIQUES;
WEIGHTS-OF-EVIDENCE;
NAIVE BAYES TREE;
FREQUENCY RATIO;
RIVER-BASIN;
ENSEMBLE;
FOREST;
COUNTY;
VIKOR;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.073
中图分类号:
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号:
0813 ;
摘要:
Floods around the world are having devastating effects on human life and property. In this paper, three Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) analysis techniques (VIKOR, TOPSIS and SAW), along with two machine learning methods (NBT and NB), were tested for their ability to model flood susceptibility in one of China's most flood-prone areas, the Ningdu Catchment. Twelve flood conditioning factors were used as input parameters: Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), lithology, land use, distance from river, curvature, altitude, Stream Transport Index (STI), Topographic Wetness Index (TWI), Stream Power Index (SPI), soil type, slope and rainfall. The predictive capacity of the models was evaluated and validated using the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC). While all models showed a strong flood prediction capability (AUC > 0.95), the NBT model performed best (AUC = 0.98), suggesting that, among the models studied, the NBT model is a promising tool for the assessment of flood-prone areas and can allow for proper planning and management of flood hazards.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 323
页数:13
相关论文