A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modeling using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis and Machine Learning Methods

被引:446
作者
Khosravi, Khabat [1 ]
Shahabi, Himan [2 ]
Binh Thai Pham [3 ]
Adamowski, Jan [4 ]
Shirzadi, Ataollah [5 ]
Pradhan, Biswajeet [6 ,7 ]
Dou, Jie [8 ]
Ly, Hai-Bang [9 ]
Grof, Gyula [10 ]
Huu Loc Ho [11 ]
Hong, Haoyuan [12 ]
Chapi, Kamran [5 ]
Prakash, Indra [13 ]
机构
[1] Sari Agr Sci & Nat Resources Univ, Dept Watershed Management Engn, Sari, Iran
[2] Univ Kurdistan, Fac Nat Resources, Dept Geomorphol, Sanandaj, Iran
[3] Duy Tan Univ, Inst Res & Dev, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Bioresource Engn, Ste Anne De Bellevue, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Kurdistan, Dept Rangeland & Watershed Management, Fac Nat Res, Sanandaj, Iran
[6] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Engn & IT, CAMGIS, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[7] Sejong Univ, Dept Energy & Mineral Resources Engn, 209 NeungdongroGwangjin Gu, Seoul 05006, South Korea
[8] PWRI, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
[9] Univ Transport Technol, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
[10] Budapest Univ Technol & Econ, Dept Energy Engn, Budapest, Hungary
[11] Nguyen Tat Thanh Univ, NTT Hitech Inst, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[12] Nanjing Normal Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Virtual Geog Environm, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[13] Govt Gujarat, Dept Sci & Technol, BISAG, Gandhinagar, India
关键词
Flood susceptibility; Machine Learning; Multi-Criteria Decision-Making; GIS; China; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE APPROACH; DATA MINING TECHNIQUES; WEIGHTS-OF-EVIDENCE; NAIVE BAYES TREE; FREQUENCY RATIO; RIVER-BASIN; ENSEMBLE; FOREST; COUNTY; VIKOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.073
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Floods around the world are having devastating effects on human life and property. In this paper, three Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) analysis techniques (VIKOR, TOPSIS and SAW), along with two machine learning methods (NBT and NB), were tested for their ability to model flood susceptibility in one of China's most flood-prone areas, the Ningdu Catchment. Twelve flood conditioning factors were used as input parameters: Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), lithology, land use, distance from river, curvature, altitude, Stream Transport Index (STI), Topographic Wetness Index (TWI), Stream Power Index (SPI), soil type, slope and rainfall. The predictive capacity of the models was evaluated and validated using the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC). While all models showed a strong flood prediction capability (AUC > 0.95), the NBT model performed best (AUC = 0.98), suggesting that, among the models studied, the NBT model is a promising tool for the assessment of flood-prone areas and can allow for proper planning and management of flood hazards.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 323
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Flood Susceptibility Assessment in Bangladesh Using Machine Learning and Multi-criteria Decision Analysis
    Rahman, Mahfuzur
    Chen Ningsheng
    Islam, Md Monirul
    Dewan, Ashraf
    Iqbal, Javed
    Washakh, Rana Muhammad Ali
    Tian Shufeng
    EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 3 (03) : 585 - 601
  • [2] A comparative assessment of multi-criteria decision analysis for flood susceptibility modelling
    Shahiri Tabarestani, Ehsan
    Afzalimehr, Hossein
    GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (20) : 5851 - 5874
  • [3] Flood susceptibility mapping with machine learning, multi-criteria decision analysis and ensemble using Dempster Shafer Theory
    Nachappa, Thimmaiah Gudiyangada
    Piralilou, Sepideh Tavakkoli
    Gholamnia, Khalil
    Ghorbanzadeh, Omid
    Rahmati, Omid
    Blaschke, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2020, 590
  • [4] Flood potential mapping by integrating the bivariate statistics, multi-criteria decision-making, and machine learning techniques
    Tabarestani, Ehsan Shahiri
    Hadian, Sanaz
    Pham, Quoc Bao
    Ali, Sk Ajim
    Phung, Dung Tri
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2023, 37 (04) : 1415 - 1430
  • [5] Incorporating multi-criteria decision-making and fuzzy-value functions for flood susceptibility assessment
    Azareh, Ali
    Sardooi, Elham Rafiei
    Choubin, Bahram
    Barkhori, Saeed
    Shahdadi, Ali
    Adamowski, Jan
    Shamshirband, Shahaboddin
    GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 36 (20) : 2345 - 2365
  • [6] A comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Ceballos B.
    Lamata M.T.
    Pelta D.A.
    Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 2016, 5 (04) : 315 - 322
  • [7] Evaluating Flood Susceptibility in the Brahmaputra River Basin: An Insight into Asia's Eastern Himalayan Floodplains Using Machine Learning and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Debnath, Jatan
    Sahariah, Dhrubajyoti
    Mazumdar, Meghna
    Lahon, Durlov
    Meraj, Gowhar
    Hashimoto, Shizuka
    Kumar, Pankaj
    Singh, Suraj Kumar
    Kanga, Shruti
    Chand, Kesar
    Saikia, Anup
    EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 7 (04) : 733 - 760
  • [8] Coastal Flood risk assessment using ensemble multi-criteria decision-making with machine learning approaches
    Asiri, Mashael M.
    Aldehim, Ghadah
    Alruwais, Nuha
    Allafi, Randa
    Alzahrani, Ibrahim
    Nouri, Amal M.
    Assiri, Mohammed
    Ahmed, Noura Abdelaziz
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 245
  • [9] A Hybrid GIS Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method for Flood Susceptibility Mapping at Shangyou, China
    Wang, Yi
    Hong, Haoyuan
    Chen, Wei
    Li, Shaojun
    Pamucar, Dragan
    Gigovic, Ljubomir
    Drobnjak, Sinisa
    Dieu Tien Bui
    Duan, Hexiang
    REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (01)
  • [10] Assessment of data mining, multi-criteria decision making and fuzzy-computing techniques for spatial flood susceptibility mapping: a comparative study
    Balogun, Abdul-Lateef
    Sheng, Tan Yong
    Sallehuddin, Muhammad Helmy
    Aina, Yusuf A.
    Dano, Umar Lawal
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Yekeen, Shamsudeen
    Tella, Abdulwaheed
    GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (26) : 12989 - 13015