Skeletal Stability and Complications in Transantral Maxillary Distraction in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate

被引:2
作者
Nkenke, Emeka [1 ]
Vairaktaris, Elefterios [2 ]
Hanke, Sebastian [3 ]
Hoffmann, Bettina [1 ]
Schlittenbauer, Tilo [1 ]
机构
[1] Erlangen Univ Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Univ Athens, Sch Med, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Attikon Hosp, GR-11527 Athens, Greece
[3] Erlangen Univ Hosp, Dept Orthodont, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
关键词
Cleft lip and palate malformation; complication; Le Fort I osteotomy; transantral maxillary distraction; CLINICAL-APPLICATION; DEVICE; OSTEOGENESIS; ADVANCEMENT; HYPOPLASIA;
D O I
10.1097/SCS.0000000000000607
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The current prospective study aimed at assessing skeletal stability and complications arising from transantral maxillary distraction adopted for advancements of less than 12 mm in patients with cleft lip, alveolus, and palate malformations. The recruited patients with cleft lip, alveolus, and palate were followed up for 12 months. Lateral skull radiographs were obtained before surgery (T0), at the end of the activation period of the distractors (T1), and after completion of the follow-up interval (T2). Length and height of the maxilla were assessed at the different points of time. The relapse rate of maxillary advancement was calculated. Complications such as infections, distractor breakage and loosening, nonunions, and the need for reoperation were documented. Seven patients were included in this study (mean [SD] age, 19.5 [2.6] y). The length of the maxilla significantly increased by 6.4 1.1 mm at T1 (P = 0.018) but showed a significant relapse by 7.5% at T2 (P = 0.018). As a complication, a case of infection of the cheek occurred during the consolidation period, which could be treated conservatively. In an additional patient, there was a loosening of a distractor at the end of the distraction period, which required reoperation with conventional fixation of the maxilla in the intended position. At the time of removal of the distractors and the conventional osteosynthesis plates, no cases of nonunion could be identified. It seems that the low horizontal relapse rate of transantral maxillary distraction in patients with cleft lip and palate outweighs the possible complications of this procedure in cases of limited distances of advancement of less than 12 mm.
引用
收藏
页码:689 / 693
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Orthodontic Considerations for Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis in Growing Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate Using Internal Distractors
    da Silveira, Adriana
    de Moura, Pollyana Marques
    Harshbarger, Raymond J., III
    SEMINARS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2014, 28 (04) : 207 - 211
  • [22] Maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery in cleft lip and palate patients: effects on speech and velopharyngeal function
    Chua, H. D. P.
    Whitehill, T. L.
    Samman, N.
    Cheung, L. K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 39 (07) : 633 - 640
  • [23] Cleft Lip and Palate LeFort I Distraction with Halo and Hybrid Internal Maxillary Distractors
    Figueroa, Alvaro A.
    Figueroa, Aaron D.
    Burton, Richard G.
    Tragos, Christina
    CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 48 (03) : 391 - 405
  • [24] Measurement of Distraction Force in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients During Le Fort I Maxillary Advancement With Rigid External Distraction
    Sawada, Hiromi
    Ogawa, Takuya
    Kataoka, Keiichi
    Baba, Yoshiyuki
    Moriyama, Keiji
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 28 (02) : 406 - 412
  • [25] Changes in maxillofacial morphology and velopharyngeal function with two-stage maxillary distraction-mandibular setback surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate
    Susami, T.
    Mori, Y.
    Ohkubo, K.
    Takahashi, M.
    Hirano, Y.
    Saijo, H.
    Takato, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 47 (03) : 357 - 365
  • [26] Pharyngeal Airway Changes Associated With Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis in Adult Cleft Lip and Palate Patients
    Aksu, Muge
    Taner, Tulin
    Sahin-Veske, Pinar
    Kocadereli, Ilken
    Konas, Ersoy
    Mavili, Mehmet Emin
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 70 (02) : E133 - E140
  • [27] Rigid External Le Fort I Distraction Followed by Secondary Bone Grafting for Maxillary Advancements in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate
    Tobolowsky, William
    Gupta, Pranjal
    Lopez, Joseph
    Cho, Regina
    Mundinger, Gerhard S.
    Yang, Robin
    Tufaro, Anthony P.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 30 (07) : 1974 - 1978
  • [28] Advancement of maxillary anterior segment by distraction osteogenesis for severe maxillary retrusion in cleft lip and palate
    Gao Feng
    Yang Minlie
    Zhao Zhenmin
    Sun Xiaomei
    Yin Ningbei
    Wang Yongqian
    Song Tao
    Li Haidong
    Wu Di
    Yin Jiapeng
    Cao Yimei
    Tong Haizhou
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 127 (03) : 500 - 505
  • [29] Skeletal stability after maxillary distraction osteogenesis or conventional Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with cleft lip and palate: A superimposition-based cephalometric analysis
    Lundberg, Joakim
    Al-Taai, Nameer
    Jaghagen, Eva Levring
    Ransjo, Maria
    Sjostrom, Mats
    ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-HEIDELBERG, 2024, 28 (02): : 925 - 934
  • [30] Skeletal stability of Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with isolated cleft palate and bilateral cleft lip and palate
    Heliövaara, A
    Ranta, R
    Hukki, J
    Rintala, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 31 (04) : 358 - 363