Skeletal Stability and Complications in Transantral Maxillary Distraction in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate

被引:2
|
作者
Nkenke, Emeka [1 ]
Vairaktaris, Elefterios [2 ]
Hanke, Sebastian [3 ]
Hoffmann, Bettina [1 ]
Schlittenbauer, Tilo [1 ]
机构
[1] Erlangen Univ Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Univ Athens, Sch Med, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Attikon Hosp, GR-11527 Athens, Greece
[3] Erlangen Univ Hosp, Dept Orthodont, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
关键词
Cleft lip and palate malformation; complication; Le Fort I osteotomy; transantral maxillary distraction; CLINICAL-APPLICATION; DEVICE; OSTEOGENESIS; ADVANCEMENT; HYPOPLASIA;
D O I
10.1097/SCS.0000000000000607
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The current prospective study aimed at assessing skeletal stability and complications arising from transantral maxillary distraction adopted for advancements of less than 12 mm in patients with cleft lip, alveolus, and palate malformations. The recruited patients with cleft lip, alveolus, and palate were followed up for 12 months. Lateral skull radiographs were obtained before surgery (T0), at the end of the activation period of the distractors (T1), and after completion of the follow-up interval (T2). Length and height of the maxilla were assessed at the different points of time. The relapse rate of maxillary advancement was calculated. Complications such as infections, distractor breakage and loosening, nonunions, and the need for reoperation were documented. Seven patients were included in this study (mean [SD] age, 19.5 [2.6] y). The length of the maxilla significantly increased by 6.4 1.1 mm at T1 (P = 0.018) but showed a significant relapse by 7.5% at T2 (P = 0.018). As a complication, a case of infection of the cheek occurred during the consolidation period, which could be treated conservatively. In an additional patient, there was a loosening of a distractor at the end of the distraction period, which required reoperation with conventional fixation of the maxilla in the intended position. At the time of removal of the distractors and the conventional osteosynthesis plates, no cases of nonunion could be identified. It seems that the low horizontal relapse rate of transantral maxillary distraction in patients with cleft lip and palate outweighs the possible complications of this procedure in cases of limited distances of advancement of less than 12 mm.
引用
收藏
页码:689 / 693
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Maxillary distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate patients with skeletal anchorage.
    Aizenbud, Dror
    Rachmiel, Adi
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2009, 46 (02) : 221 - 223
  • [2] Skeletal and Dental Stability After Maxillary Distraction With a Rigid External Device in Adult Cleft Lip and Palate Patients
    Aksu, Muge
    Saglam-Aydinatay, Banu
    Akcan, Cenk Ahmet
    El, Hakan
    Taner, Tulin
    Kocadereli, Ilken
    Tunchilek, Gokhan
    Mavili, Mehmet Emin
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 68 (02) : 254 - 259
  • [3] Transversal Maxillary Distraction in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate
    Martinez Plaza, Adoracion
    Bullejos Martinez, Elena
    Cariati, Paolo
    Fernandez-Valdes Gamez, Ricardo
    Espana Lopez, Antonio
    Fernandez Valades, Ricardo
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 30 (04) : 1149 - 1153
  • [4] Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients
    Kloukos, Dimitrios
    Fudalej, Piotr
    Sequeira-Byron, Patrick
    Katsaros, Christos
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (09):
  • [5] Mandibular effects of maxillary distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate
    Doucet, J-C
    Herlin, C.
    Bigorre, M.
    Baeumler, C.
    Subsol, G.
    Captier, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 43 (06) : 702 - 707
  • [6] Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients
    Kloukos, Dimitrios
    Fudalej, Piotr
    Sequeira-Byron, Patrick
    Katsaros, Christos
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, (08):
  • [7] Efficacy of Maxillary Anterior Segmental Distraction Osteogenesis in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate
    Tanikawa, Chihiro
    Hirata, Kae
    Aikawa, Tomonao
    Maeda, Jun
    Kogo, Mikihiko
    Iida, Seiji
    Yamashiro, Takashi
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2018, 55 (10) : 1375 - 1381
  • [8] Effects of growth on maxillary distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate
    Doucet, Jean-Charles
    Herlin, Christian
    Bigorre, Michele
    Baeumler, Caroline
    Subsol, Gerard
    Captier, Guillaume
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 41 (08) : 836 - 841
  • [9] Skeletal and soft tissue changes and stability in cleft lip and palate patients after distraction osteogenesis using a new intraoral maxillary device
    Ansari, Edward
    Tomat, Catherine
    Kadlub, Natacha
    Diner, Patrick A.
    Bellocq, Thomas
    Vazquez, Marie-Paule
    Picard, Arnaud
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 43 (03) : 323 - 328
  • [10] Nonunion of the External Maxillary Distraction in Cleft Lip and Palate: Analysis of Possible Reasons
    He, Dongmei
    Genecov, David G.
    Barcelo, Raul
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 68 (10) : 2402 - 2411