A Therapeutic Approach to Jurisprudence: A Differential Thinking Model of Sanctions and Rewards

被引:2
作者
Barber-Rioja, Virginia [1 ]
Rotter, Merrill [2 ]
机构
[1] NYU, EAC TASC, Brooklyn, NY USA
[2] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Serv, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
关键词
mental health courts; problem solving courts; therapeutic jurisprudence; diversion; MENTAL-HEALTH COURTS; NATIONAL-SURVEY; DRUG COURT; JUSTICE; ILLNESS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1080/14999013.2014.922140
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
With the goal of decreasing violations and promoting compliance, Mental Health Courts (MHCs) apply behavior modification principles through the use of sanctions and rewards, including jail as punishment. However, unlike Drug Treatment Courts where this model originated, the use of sanctions for violations in MHCs is more complex as identifying, understanding and addressing compliance are more difficult in mental health treatment. Jail as a sanction may not have any clinical utility, but can have detrimental effects for offenders in general and for those with mental illness in particular. This paper proposes that a pure sanction-and-reward model is undesirable for individuals in the legal context, and proposes an alternative approach to court violations that is consistent with the biopsychosocial, problem-solving and recovery models. This proposed approach includes "thinking differentially" about defendants' violations, identifying possible explanations for what underlies the problematic behavior and administering more situation-specific clinical and judicial interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 278
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Amrhein C., 2010, Service delivery for vulnerable populations: New directions in behavioral health, P329
[2]   REHABILITATING CRIMINAL JUSTICE POLICY AND PRACTICE [J].
Andrews, D. A. ;
Bonta, James .
PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW, 2010, 16 (01) :39-55
[3]  
[Anonymous], CRIMINAL LAW B
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425787
[5]   THE UTILITY OF THE HCR-20 AND PCL:SV IN THE PREDICTION OF DIVERSION NONCOMPLIANCE AND REINCARCERATION IN DIVERSION PROGRAMS [J].
Barber-Rioja, Virginia ;
Dewey, Lauren ;
Kopelovich, Sarah ;
Kucharski, L. Thomas .
CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2012, 39 (04) :475-492
[6]  
Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, 2003, ROL MENT HLTH COURTS
[7]   The case of Sohrab Hassan: Assault on liberty in the Texas Mental Health Courts [J].
Breeding, J .
JOURNAL OF HUMANISTIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 46 (03) :243-254
[8]   A Multi-Site Study of the Use of Sanctions and Incentives in Mental Health Courts [J].
Callahan, Lisa ;
Steadman, Henry J. ;
Tillman, Sheila ;
Vesselinov, Roumen .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2013, 37 (01) :1-9
[9]   THE NEO-KRAEPELINIAN REVOLUTION IN PSYCHIATRIC-DIAGNOSIS [J].
COMPTON, WM ;
GUZE, SB .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1995, 245 (4-5) :196-201
[10]  
Epperson M., 2011, The next generation of behavioral health and criminal justice interventions: Improving outcomes by improving interventions