Virtual tagging for laxative-free CT colonography: Pilot evaluation

被引:14
作者
Naeppi, Janne [1 ]
Yoshida, Hiroyuki
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
biological organs; computerised tomography; identification technology; medical image processing; statistical analysis; virtual reality; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COLORECTAL-CANCER; OBSERVER PERFORMANCE; FALSE POSITIVES; AIDED DETECTION; POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; SEGMENTATION; FEASIBILITY; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1118/1.3113893
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Laxative-free computed tomographic colonography (lfCTC) could significantly improve patient adherence to colorectal screening. However, the interpretation of lfCTC data is complicated by the presence of poorly tagged feces and partial-volume artifacts that imitate colorectal lesions. The authors developed a method for virtual tagging of such artifacts. A probabilistic model of colonic wall was developed, and virtual tagging was performed on artifacts that were identified by the model. The method was evaluated with 46 clinical lfCTC cases that were prepared with dietary fecal tagging only. Visual examples show that the method can label partial-volume artifacts, poorly tagged feces, nonadhering completely untagged feces, and artifacts such as rectal tubes. The effect of virtual tagging was evaluated by comparing the detection accuracy of a fully automated polyp detection scheme without and with the method. With virtual tagging, the per-lesion detection sensitivity was 100% for lesions >= 10 mm (n=4) with 3.8 false positives per patient (per two CT scan volumes) and 90% for lesions >= 6 mm (n=10) with 5.4 false positives per patient on average. The improvement in detection performance by virtual tagging was statistically significant (p=0.03; JAFROC and JAFROC-1).
引用
收藏
页码:1830 / 1838
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Bayes T., 1763, PHILOS T ROY SOC LON, V53, P418, DOI DOI 10.1098/RSTL.1763.0053
[2]  
Beebe TJ, 2007, MAYO CLIN PROC, V82, P666
[3]   Structure-analysis method for electronic cleansing in cathartic and noncathartic CT colonography [J].
Cai, Wenli ;
Zalis, Michael E. ;
Naeppi, Janne ;
Harris, Gordon J. ;
Yoshida, Hiroyuki .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (07) :3259-3277
[4]   CT colonography without cathartic preparation: Feasibility study [J].
Callstrom, MR ;
Johnson, CD ;
Fletcher, JG ;
Reed, JE ;
Ahlquist, DA ;
Harmsen, WS ;
Tait, K ;
Wilson, LA ;
Corcoran, KE .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 219 (03) :693-698
[5]   Analysis of location specific observer performance data: Validated extensions of the jackknife free-response (JAFROC) method [J].
Chakraborty, Dev P. .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2006, 13 (10) :1187-1193
[6]   Validation and Statistical Power Comparison of Methods for Analyzing Free-response Observer Performance Studies [J].
Chakraborty, Dev P. .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2008, 15 (12) :1554-1566
[7]   Observer studies involving detection and localization: Modeling, analysis, and validation [J].
Chakraborty, DP ;
Berbaum, KS .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (08) :2313-2330
[8]  
Dachman AH, 2002, RADIOLOGY, V225, P303
[9]   RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC RATING ANALYSIS - GENERALIZATION TO THE POPULATION OF READERS AND PATIENTS WITH THE JACKKNIFE METHOD [J].
DORFMAN, DD ;
BERBAUM, KS ;
METZ, CE .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1992, 27 (09) :723-731
[10]   Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography [J].
Fenton, Joshua J. ;
Taplin, Stephen H. ;
Carney, Patricia A. ;
Abraham, Linn ;
Sickles, Edward A. ;
D'Orsi, Carl ;
Berns, Eric A. ;
Cutter, Gary ;
Hendrick, R. Edward ;
Barlow, William E. ;
Elmore, Joann G. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (14) :1399-1409