SmartOntoSensor: Ontology for Semantic Interpretation of Smartphone Sensors Data for Context-Aware Applications

被引:20
作者
Ali, Shaukat [1 ]
Khusro, Shah [1 ]
Ullah, Irfan [1 ]
Khan, Akif [1 ]
Khan, Inayat [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Peshawar, Dept Comp Sci, Peshawar 25210, Pakistan
关键词
D O I
10.1155/2017/8790198
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The integration of cheap and powerful sensors in smartphones has enabled the emergence of several context-aware applications and frameworks. However, the available smartphone context-aware frameworks are static because of using relational data models having predefined usage of sensory data. Importantly, the frameworks lack the soft integration of new data types and relationships that appear with the emergence of new smartphone sensors. Furthermore, sensors generate huge data that intensifies the problem of too much data and not enough knowledge. Smarting of smartphone sensory data is essential for advanced analytical processing, integration, inferencing, and interpretation by context-aware applications. In order to achieve this goal, novel smartphone sensors ontology is required for semantic modeling of smartphones and sensory data, which is the main contribution of this paper. This paper presents SmartOntoSensor, a lightweight mid-level ontology that has been developed using NeOn methodology and Content Ontology Design pattern. The ontology describes smartphone and sensors from different aspects including platforms, deployments, measurement capabilities and properties, observations, data fusion, and context modeling. SmartOntoSensor has been developed using Protege and evaluated using OntoQA, SPARQL, and experimental study. The ontology is also tested by integrating into ModeChanger application that leverages SmartOntoSensor for automatic changing of smartphone modes according to the varying contexts. We have obtained promising results that advocate for the improved ontological design and applications of SmartOntoSensor.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [31] Preuveneers D, 2004, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3295, P148
  • [32] Russomanno DJ, 2005, ICAI '05: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2005 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, P637
  • [33] Sensor ontologies: From shallow to deep models
    Russomanno, DJ
    Kothari, C
    Thomas, O
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY-SEVENTH SOUTHEASTERN SYMPOSIUM ON SYSTEM THEORY, 2005, : 107 - 112
  • [34] Schlenoff Craig, 2013, 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Robotic and Sensors Environments (ROSE 2013), P96, DOI 10.1109/ROSE.2013.6698425
  • [35] Shi YM, 2012, COMM COM INF SC, V312, P277
  • [36] Reusing ontologies on the Semantic Web: A feasibility study
    Simperl, Elena
    [J]. DATA & KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING, 2009, 68 (10) : 905 - 925
  • [37] Suarez-Figueroa M. C., 2011, Ontology engineering in a networked world, P9, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-24794-1_2, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-24794-1_2, 10.1007/978-3-642-24794-12, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-24794-12]
  • [38] Subercaze J, 2007, P 2 INT C BOD AR NET, P1
  • [39] Ontology evaluation and ranking using OntoQA
    Tartir, Samir
    Arpinar, I. Budak
    [J]. ICSC 2007: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SEMANTIC COMPUTING, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 185 - +
  • [40] Tartir S, 2010, THEORY AND APPLICATIONS OF ONTOLOGY: COMPUTER APPLICATIONS, P115, DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-8847-5_5